Behind the Numbers

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
So i wanted to take some time to start a discussion around the offense and specifically, the qb position. We're heading into the unknown with two, unproven players competing for the starting job at QB, with at best, limited relevant data to understand their strengths and weaknesses and reasonably forecast how they might do in Hawks Blue and under the guidance of Shane Waldron and his offense. What we do know is that aside from some flashes from Geno last year, the tape we have on both Lock and Geno isnt necessarily inspiring. Mitigating circumstances come into play for both to a degree, but the numbers are there for us to see and evaluate as best as we can. We also know what we've seen over the last few years with Wilson at the helm. Incredible accuracy, arm talent, grit, and an uncanny knack for just making the play. What's less clear is how well the offense was performing overall based on play calls and design. Much of that still cant be pulled out through data and analytics, without also having access to game film and actual game plans, but my hope is that by looking at some simple data, we can better understand what we are seeing on the field and paint a more reasonable picture of what's happening, if not always why.

To start, I thought it might be valuable to take a look at our offense over the last two years with Russ at the helm, to evaluate a few metrics. One that's been talked about a lot, given his height and preference for the deep ball, is depth of target on throws. In Russ's case, its pretty obvious that height didnt define his success in the NFL. But it HAS influenced how he plays. He can make every throw, but prefers to throw outside. He DOES throw to the middle of the field, but those throws tend to be routes like curls, and less layered crossing patterns - a topic for later. Understanding where our offense went with the ball when he was at QB as well as how it performed under Schotty vs Waldron, MIGHT give us some insight as to what we can expect moving forward (dont know this for sure, but maybe). Also, understanding the performance of the offense last year prior to Russ injury vs after vs the offense with Geno might also lend some insight as to just where we are as an offensive system. Again there are dynamics at play that we aren't privy to and never will be, without becoming a member of the team, but we can do what we can with what's available. I will have to do this in chunks as its a lot of info to grab.

First - Russ's depth of target completion percentage on all downs - Pre injury. The dashed line represents the NFL avg over the prior 2 seasons.
Wilson  before injury all downs


And his DOT% on 3rd down pre injury
Wilson  before injury 3rd down

And Wilsons DOT % on 1st and 2nd downs

Wilson  before injury 1st and 2nd  down

The analysis: In a nutshell, from what i can see, Russ was obviously great on 1st and 2nd down in terms of his completion at all depths. But on 3rd down, even before his injury, he became very average and worse inside 20 yards and outside of around 33 yards. This trend is supported by other sites that document Russ's passing proficiency on known passing downs slips considerably relative to other qb 's at his level of ability.

To contrast, here's Geno's chart (not picking sides, but the only comparison we have in our system, under the same coordinator, in the same season, is Geno)

Geno on all downs for the games he played

Geno Smith on all downs

And Geno on 3rd down

Geno smith on 3rd down

What does it say? What i see is a qb playing in the same system, who doesn't have the long ball accuracy nor the attempts that Russ has (playcalling and likely talent) but his performance across all down is fairly predictable and above average. In fact, he's slightly better on throws at around 20 yards on 3rd down than he is on 1st and 2nd. this is likely what Pete and Shane see when they're evaluating his play : a guy who you can pretty consistently count on to do the 'standard' stuff, if not yet the spectacular.

Now you might argue that some of Russ's poor numbers can be attributed to the sacks he absorbs and the resultant, longer 3rd down throws required. But regardless of whether those sacks were self inflicted or a result of poor blocking and required a 3rd a +8 to go play, Geno's sack numbers were pretty high as well, yet, his accuracy on throws out to almost 25 yards was better.

Does this make him a better player? No. But it certainly shows that regardless of target depth, out to 25 yards, and regardless of down, if he throws the ball, there's a good chance it will be completed. And that consistency is something the offense has been lacking. consistency allows the players and coaches to better evaluate who and what is working and use that info to gameplan and make adjustments in game. Neither the plan nor the adjustment can necessraily overcome excessively poor play from a player, especially at the QB position. But the stats to date don's show that that's what we have in Geno. Coachable, predictable, and because of that, the outcome of the game begins to slide toward the control of the coordinator and how effectively he can scheme success on the ground and the air.

And for comparison, Wilson over the entire 2020 season, under Schottenheimer - the guy he apparently wasn't happy with

Wilson 2020 all downs

And Wilson in 2020 on 3rd down

Wilson 2020 3rd down

Will post more later on Lock and DOT% for Russ over the last few games of the season. Its worth mentioning that few QB in the league have the upward trend that Russ shows beyond 30 yards...

What is shows - To me ? - a qb who played much more consistently and predictably across all downs for the 2020 season. Its worth noting in trying to figure out what led to the downward trend in 2021, that Russ was enthusiastic about Waldron. Praised him. And that Pete was enthusiastic about both Shane and Brian, but grew frustrated at the downward trend of the passing game in 2020 and was often fuming at the performance of the offense in 2021 as early as week 2. makes me wonder IF 2020 represented Russ under more control by Schottenheimer and overall better consistency across all downs, and 2021 was Russ exercising his control in the offense with Waldron, does it shed some light onto the reasons behind the erratic swing in performance and play selection last year? Was it Waldron or was it Russ? The data in Russ's own performance and Genos under the same system seems to indicate more consistent play from the position across all downs when operating within the framework of the offense. Again, assuming Russ was doing that in 2020 ( he expressed frustration at being 'stuck' in it -despite) and not doing it in 2021 (he expressed annoyance at being questioned about why HE made the decisions he did with the ball)

For context : 2020 while Russ was cooking : 1st and 2nd downs

Wilson 2020 cooking 1st and 2nd down


And Russ cooking (before Buffalo) on 3rd down

Wilson 2020 cooking 3rd down

Vs Russ post cooking in 2020 on 3rd down (post Buffalo)

Wilson 2020 not cooking 3rd down

And Russ on all downs, Post Buffalo in 2020:

Wilson 2020 not cooking All down

The simple, obvious takeaway is that the play selection obviously skewed toward shallower targets after week 7, and the percentage of passes completed out to 23 yards was above average on all downs and especially good out to 20 yards on 3rd down. It was that shift that allowed the offense to sustain longer drives and bring TOP into balance a bit better.

As a set, taken outside of contextual data like avg drive duration, it would seem that the 1st few charts where Russ was literally off the charts on 1st and 2nd down would be ideal. But there's a correlation in there somewhere between the upward sweep trend that Russ shows and scoring plays - which although good, when they are paired with inconsistent 3rd down play, net a situation where scoring can actually be nullified by the TOP surrendered to the opposition.

Thats all i've got for now.
 

Attachments

  • wilson  before injury all.JPG
    wilson before injury all.JPG
    92.2 KB · Views: 7
Last edited:
OP
OP
keasley45

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
Unfortunately, data i'snt available for 2021 after our first game against the Cards, but we can do a look back as far as 2018.
 
OP
OP
keasley45

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
So now, looking at Lock, I thought it probably made the most sense to start with the 5 games he played in 2019 first, to get a sense of how well he threw the ball at short, medium and long distances (same DOT study as with Russ and Geno). For context, i also thought it might be valuable to compare Drew to Josh Allen - another young QB who struggled early in his career, but then took off when he gained a bit more experience and had the benefit of a better relationship with his coaching staff. Graphic shows Drew and Josh combined. Drew over a limited 5 game sample, Josh, for the season:

2019 Josh Allen vs Drew Lock

Its hard to say whether Drew would have maintained his level of performance over an entire season, or whether he may have improved. But in his first few starts, he wasnt spectacular, but he was better than Josh (or comparable) out to 20 yards and then significantly better from there out. Now the comparison should be tempered by the fact that Josh's numbers weren't spectacular (3000+ yards, 59% completion, 20/9 TD to INT). Good, but not great. Acceptable for a QB in his second year. The fact that drew threw for 1020 yards, 7 TD / 3 int's, and a 63% completion percentage in his first year is notable in the comparison. Over a season, maintaining that performance would have yielded 3060 yards, 21 TD and 9 Ints, 63% complete. Not bad, and better than what Josh did in his second year. You might think then , that if everything else was equal, and each QB had a siimlar trajectory in terms of their improvement, season to season, that Drew might be ahead in his growth. But the world doesn't always function in a linear fashion. The following year, Drew's coaching staff changed as did his offense. A Covid stricken season also truncated training camp activities and so Drew went from a position of what might have been strength, to essentially starting over in an unfamiliar system, with a staff that, by all accounts, didnt connect with him well, nor provided the degree of mentorship he received the year prior. Adding to the challenging year, Drew's best wr option would be J Jeudy, in his first season, with the same limited time to practice and become accustomed to the offense. Josh, on the other hand, entered the following year with 2 years of experience in Sean McDermott and Bryan Daybol's system along with seasoned Stefon Diggs as his new primary weapon - one of the best in the game.

The results are predictable:

2020 josh allen v drew lock

Josh's accuracy increased drastically at all depths, maintaining an above avg rate out to almost 35 yards, while Drew regressed considerably, falling well below average at all depths. So the question obviously is - can Drew reset the table in Seattle and build on a start that was better than what Josh Allen showed in his second year in a stable system, with consistent coaching? Again, each qb has his own specific strengths and weaknesses that ultimately dictate how high their respective ceilings will be, so an answer is impossible to accurately predict. What we can say for sure is Drew played pretty well coming off the bench in his rookie season, and then regressed the following year. How one can say that the shortened preseason and failure of team leadership that would occur the following two seasons had NO effect on his performance is difficult to understand. In my view, the question is - how much of Drew's regression was coaching.
 

toffee

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 9, 2016
Messages
10,589
Reaction score
6,739
Location
SoCal Desert
Great post, even by your standard!! Long but informative read, totally enjoyed it. As for Drew, I am not sure about his footwork and poised under pressure. Most of his misfires were under pressure which often led to erroneous footwork?
 
OP
OP
keasley45

keasley45

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 4, 2010
Messages
3,865
Reaction score
6,776
Location
Cockeysville, Md
I forgot about this thread until I saw a like from Toffee about it, so I figured I give it a bump, only because it's cool to see hiw absolutely Rock solid our QB has been going back to his starts last year. And to add to that, his completions beyond 25 yards have improved beyond what he showed last year (eyeball test, not confirmed).

I'm sure Geno will still have his ups and downs, but going by last years data and this, it would seem as though if he does have a bad game, it would be more the exception. He's put 10 games on tape now... 14 Tds, 2 ints as our starter. And his 3rd down conversion rate on his arm is really solid.

Glad Geno is proving the data right, beyond the W-L record folks were fixated on over his 4 games last year. He may have only got us 1 win, but it wasn't due to the failure of his QB play. He had the INT on Tyler's slip, and he had the fumble in a game when our o-line was about as solid as a wiffle-ball.

And if you add in his 4 starts in the preseason, the consistency of his solid play is even more impressive.

Pete had to be stewing last year when we were giving away games at GB, Wash, etc, knowing he had a guy on the bench who could do what Geno has shown.

Glad they made the switch.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,672
Reaction score
1,713
<snip>

Pete had to be stewing last year when we were giving away games at GB, Wash, etc, knowing he had a guy on the bench who could do what Geno has shown.

Glad they made the switch.
I have to hand it to Pete and John the way they allowed Russell to manipulate the narrative, "Elite QB frustrated and limited by Carroll's stodgy antiquated system" to get max trade value for Russell.

All the time, PC/JS knew the real narrative was, "Aging game manager diva QB who can't play within structure and timing, elite elusiveness gone, sandlot skills diminishing, seeks new team to overpay him for past press clippings".

Just think how hard it had to be for Pete to continue to effusively praise Russell while being frustrated by Russell's control issues and refusal to run the offense the way Pete and Waldron wanted it to be run, refusing to make the reads and go through progressions. Actually probably not that hard for Pete because he's clever that way.
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,109
Geno may still have some struggles ahead. As there's more tape, there will be some creative DCoordinators that find some ways to make his life difficult. Personally, I think Geno has benefitted from the League feeling like they already know him. That's obviously changing and so far Geno's stayed a step ahead. Obviously, we all hope he continues to do so. However, this is the exact reason JS will wait to decide about the specifics on an extension negotiation until late in the season.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
5,457
Reaction score
3,110
Location
Kennewick, WA
Geno may still have some struggles ahead. As there's more tape, there will be some creative DCoordinators that find some ways to make his life difficult. Personally, I think Geno has benefitted from the League feeling like they already know him. That's obviously changing and so far Geno's stayed a step ahead. Obviously, we all hope he continues to do so. However, this is the exact reason JS will wait to decide about the specifics on an extension negotiation until late in the season.
Keep in mind that Geno is a free agent after this season, so it's not just a matter of us extending him.
 

chrispy

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,109
Keep in mind that Geno is a free agent after this season, so it's not just a matter of us extending him.
To me, I think that's a big topic. On one hand Geno has been beat down in a lot of places and found a real chance in Seattle. He's also in a system where the last QB failed after leaving. On the other hand, there are lots of teams that would ditch their 22QBs for Geno's performance. So...JS has first shot at signing him while he's still under contract. But yes, absolutely, if he wants to bet on himself in FA after the season, there's a chance JS is outbid.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
5,457
Reaction score
3,110
Location
Kennewick, WA
To me, I think that's a big topic. On one hand Geno has been beat down in a lot of places and found a real chance in Seattle. He's also in a system where the last QB failed after leaving. On the other hand, there are lots of teams that would ditch their 22QBs for Geno's performance. So...JS has first shot at signing him while he's still under contract. But yes, absolutely, if he wants to bet on himself in FA after the season, there's a chance JS is outbid.
At 32, Geno is at the end of his career, so if I'm him, I'd look for the best financial deal possible. In addition, our stance will depend on which QB's in the draft we like and that we think we can get given ours and/or Denver's finish.

But we're assuming that Geno's going to continue to play well and remains healthy. We're barely 1/3 into the season, so let's see how things play out from here before we start talking about 2023.
 

scutterhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
9,823
Reaction score
1,791
Geno may still have some struggles ahead. As there's more tape, there will be some creative DCoordinators that find some ways to make his life difficult. Personally, I think Geno has benefitted from the League feeling like they already know him. That's obviously changing and so far Geno's stayed a step ahead. Obviously, we all hope he continues to do so. However, this is the exact reason JS will wait to decide about the specifics on an extension negotiation until late in the season.
Defensive Coordinators gaining "More Tape" on Geno? for sure they will, but there's still a lot that Geno has yet to unleash, they will have to prognosticate his developmental growths with the Seahawks ever changing offensive Line (continuity) and the ever-changing weaponry he has at hand AND their ever-evolving skills
I'm betting that Geno appreciates the confidence that Pete has shown towards him, and how he hung in there & stood by him when everybody else around the League had him rated as a Mega-BUST (33rd in the League)
I'm also in the belief that Geno will give Pete a hometown discount for standing by him through it all, and IF I'm wrong, I'll eat a LOBSTER!!!
 
Last edited:

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
5,672
Reaction score
1,713
Defensive Coordinators gaining "More Tape" on Geno? for sure they will, but there's still a lot that Geno has yet to unleashed, they will have to prognosticate his developmental growths with the Seahawks ever changing offensive Line (continuity) and the ever-changing weaponry he has at hand AND their ever-evolving skills
I'm betting that Geno appreciates the confidence that Pete has shown towards him, and how he hung in there & stood by him when everybody else around the League had him rated as a Mega-BUST (33rd in the League)
I'm also in the belief that Geno will give Pete a hometown discount for standing by him through it all, and IF I'm wrong, I'll eat a LOBSTER!!!
There's also the factor that Geno has multiple years in Waldron's (McVay-inspired) system, and has only shown highly successful QB play in THAT system, so he may be viewed with skepticism by other teams as a "system QB". On the flipside, teams that are running, or trying to run, a similar offense, I would expect to be interested in Geno. I don't offhand know who all those teams are.

Teams that run a dissimilar offense, and plan to continue to do so, e.g., fits their existing non-QB personnel, I think would view Geno as likely needing a full year to acclimate to their offense, and may be less interested.

Personally, if I were in Geno's shoes, I would want to both a) Get PAID! and b) KNOW I'd be successful in my 2023 destination, to help ensure MORE paydays. Only in Seattle will there be a near-guarantee of success. If he signed a 2 year deal with the Hawks for good money, $25M per year? Geno at 35 with 2 very successful years behind him *could* still be able to get one more bag at age 35.

Also, the Hawks might actually choose to trade $25M Geno if Drew Lock is signed for another year and shows he can provide comparable results, and pay Lock say, $10M for two years of a prior contract, and extend him in a team-friendly way, since Lock is much younger than Geno.

As mentioned, there's also the factor that it's only Week 7 and NFL DCs might come up with ways to defend Geno that make life more difficult for him, AND also that Geno may improve even more and/or adjust to those schemes successfully.

Isn't it a much more entertaining year to be a Seahawks fan than we expected? :)
 

Smellyman

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 8, 2013
Messages
7,125
Reaction score
1,047
Location
Taipei
At 32, Geno is at the end of his career, so if I'm him, I'd look for the best financial deal possible. In addition, our stance will depend on which QB's in the draft we like and that we think we can get given ours and/or Denver's finish.

But we're assuming that Geno's going to continue to play well and remains healthy. We're barely 1/3 into the season, so let's see how things play out from here before we start talking about 2023.
I am not saying re-sign him or he is the future going forward, but he is not at the end of his career. A 32yo Geno is like Wilson at 27 or any other day 1 starter. Not a lot of miles his body
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
5,457
Reaction score
3,110
Location
Kennewick, WA
I am not saying re-sign him or he is the future going forward, but he is not at the end of his career. A 32yo Geno is like Wilson at 27 or any other day 1 starter. Not a lot of miles his body
Quarterbacks don't have the same odometer as a running back or wide receiver. The road they travel isn't as rough, which is how a 43-year old Tom Brady can play at a high level.

Outside of HOF'ers like Brady, Brees, Manning, etc, there's not many quarterbacks with starting jobs that are over 32 years of age and even fewer that are signed to multi year contracts. There's only one starting quarterback position, and most teams prefer a younger player with a potential to become that QBOTF over a player in their early 30's.
 

Scout

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
1,295
Reaction score
1,598
I have to hand it to Pete and John the way they allowed Russell to manipulate the narrative, "Elite QB frustrated and limited by Carroll's stodgy antiquated system" to get max trade value for Russell.

All the time, PC/JS knew the real narrative was, "Aging game manager diva QB who can't play within structure and timing, elite elusiveness gone, sandlot skills diminishing, seeks new team to overpay him for past press clippings".

Just think how hard it had to be for Pete to continue to effusively praise Russell while being frustrated by Russell's control issues and refusal to run the offense the way Pete and Waldron wanted it to be run, refusing to make the reads and go through progressions. Actually probably not that hard for Pete because he's clever that way.
That is how it is in the business world.

Sometimes you give people what they want. They will learn the truth until it is too late but you play your best hand knowing the information you have. And that information is worth its weight in gold to keep things under wraps for maximum benefit.

PC/JS were disciplined and stood by their plans to move forward.
 

FrodosFinger

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2022
Messages
2,311
Reaction score
2,319
Geno’s maturity, football IQ, experience in Waldron’s system and his strong arm have really shined this year. I can’t see him regressing but only getting better with each start. And with a quality back like Walker in the backfield I think we’ll start to see more big plays In upcoming games that all feel very winnable at this point
 
Top