Atlanta blitzes 2nd most behind Minnesota

BigMeach

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 14, 2012
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
709
It is good to face teams that run a lot of blitzing and disguised blitzing. Our line needs to see that and learn how to play against it better as over the entirety of that last game.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
James Pearce Jr. could be out, too.



No excuse for not only winning this game but winning it going away.

Perfect game to get the Darnold/JSN connection back in business and to (hopefully) get Rashid Shaheed some touches in the passing game, too.

Yes, they blitz but Darnold's been able to handle blitzing by CONVENTIONAL defenses (ie NOT Brian Flores Defenses) so I look for him to be able to make plays against Atlanta should they bring the house.
 

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
33,894
Reaction score
10,443
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
James Pearce Jr. could be out, too.



No excuse for not only winning this game but winning it going away.

Perfect game to get the Darnold/JSN connection back in business and to (hopefully) get Rashid Shaheed some touches in the passing game, too.

Yes, they blitz but Darnold's been able to handle blitzing by CONVENTIONAL defenses (ie NOT Brian Flores Defenses) so I look for him to be able to make plays against Atlanta should they bring the house.

Yea the “blitz” can be concerning, and Atlanta does it at the 2nd highest rate but….

The Vikes are the highest rate in terms of Blitzes



Should not be an issue as long as they game plan for it.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
7,061
Reaction score
4,986
Location
Kennewick, WA
While I certainly know we have one of the best defenses in the NFL, I’m pretty sure them starting an undrafted rookie QB helped play a role in that final score.
An undrafted rookie that had he spiked the ball on every snap would have had a higher passer rating than he put up against us. I don't think we can count on that kind of performance out of an opposing quarterback in very many of our remaining games.
 

RiverDog

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
7,061
Reaction score
4,986
Location
Kennewick, WA
Yea the “blitz” can be concerning, and Atlanta does it at the 2nd highest rate but….

The Vikes are the highest rate in terms of Blitzes



Should not be an issue as long as they game plan for it.
Yeah, you can look at it two different ways, and you've described one of them, that it exposed a weakness that we can now correct by game planning.

The other way you can look at it is that the Vikings discovered the blueprint on how to stop our offense and exposed our Achilles heel for other teams to follow.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
Meh. I don't call any blueprint by a Flores Defense against the Seahawks usable for any defense aside from a Flores Defense.

I mean we've had teams blitz before the Vikings game.

You think no other team has tried that strategy already for the past 11 games (going into the Vikings game)?
 

HawkinNY

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 24, 2009
Messages
1,857
Reaction score
637
Location
Fishkill, NY
This game will tell teams blitzing will beat Seattle or it won’t. If the offense can score points today I will feel better about their chances. If they stink the bed then all games going forward teams will blitz 60% plus of the time.
 

Hawkstud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2025
Messages
290
Reaction score
363
While I certainly know we have one of the best defenses in the NFL, I’m pretty sure them starting an undrafted rookie QB helped play a role in that final score.
Oh for sure, but MM's defense also kept Matt Stafford from looking all world.
That loss was not on Macdonald's swarming defense I mean 4 interceptions by Darnold in that game was too much to overcome.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
Oh for sure, but MM's defense also kept Matt Stafford from looking all world.
That loss was not on Macdonald's swarming defense I mean 4 interceptions by Darnold in that game was too much to overcome.
Barely, imo.

The fact that he could've just had 3 interceptions (and the Hawks still would've won) speaks volumes to how dominant this defense is.

Anyway, that's neither here nor there.

Time to stomp on some dirty birds in Atlanta. :devilish:
 

sutz

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
33,759
Reaction score
11,598
Location
Kent, WA
Another great defensive game against the Dirty Birds!
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
Kyle Brandt was on our jocks all year. We lose to the Rams and he completely flips. Wanted to like him, but nah. Frontrunner.
If the Rams beat a team, no matter who it is, he acts like they just won the Super Bowl. It never gets old :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Kyle Brandt is off our team's Tip apparently.

Absolutely no mention of the Seahawks game whatsoever on this show.

 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,552
Reaction score
28,646
Location
Sammamish, WA
Even though the week leading up to the Clams game, he was on the Hawks jock.
EXACTLY why I can't stand that guy. I tried, I just can't with him.
 
N

NoGain

Guest
I was watching a show with a panel of "experts" and they were talking about the SB contenders in the NFC. They had the Rams, Packers, and Eagles on top. Then someone asked what about the Seahawks? They all agreed we were a really good team with a really good defense, but our offense just wasn't good enough. So we're still not quite in that top tier, apparently.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
I was watching a show with a panel of "experts" and they were talking about the SB contenders in the NFC. They had the Rams, Packers, and Eagles on top. Then someone asked what about the Seahawks? They all agreed we were a really good team with a really good defense, but our offense just wasn't good enough. So we're still not quite in that top tier, apparently.

"So if we hold the Rams to 20 points and we score 27, is our offense "good enough" then, you assclowns?" That's what I would respond with.
 

Glasgow Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 5, 2013
Messages
3,120
Reaction score
1,724
I was watching a show with a panel of "experts" and they were talking about the SB contenders in the NFC. They had the Rams, Packers, and Eagles on top. Then someone asked what about the Seahawks? They all agreed we were a really good team with a really good defense, but our offense just wasn't good enough. So we're still not quite in that top tier, apparently.
I think it all comes down to next thursday for the contender narrative. Win and I think we go all the way. Darnolds turnovers are the only real weakness currently, maybe lack of an explosive run game.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,235
Reaction score
7,243
I think it all comes down to next thursday for the contender narrative. Win and I think we go all the way. Darnolds turnovers are the only real weakness currently, maybe lack of an explosive run game.
This defense can absorb a turnover here and there provided the Offense is, at the very least, passable enough to score a few TDs with some FGs.
 

Latest posts

Top