HawkinNY":1os12sz8 said:I think Wilson has to much going on in his personal life and is not ready.
...
Laloosh":tnh4omnt said:HawkinNY":tnh4omnt said:I think Wilson has to much going on in his personal life and is not ready.
...
I must know, why do you think this? Before you answer, please try to recall that he's been through a divorce and two super bowls.
mrt144":4dlqpqe4 said:Laloosh":4dlqpqe4 said:HawkinNY":4dlqpqe4 said:I think Wilson has to much going on in his personal life and is not ready.
...
I must know, why do you think this? Before you answer, please try to recall that he's been through a divorce and two super bowls.
Time to read up on Bayesian inferences?![]()
Laloosh":6zg8ms7r said:mrt144":6zg8ms7r said:Laloosh":6zg8ms7r said:HawkinNY":6zg8ms7r said:I think Wilson has to much going on in his personal life and is not ready.
...
I must know, why do you think this? Before you answer, please try to recall that he's been through a divorce and two super bowls.
Time to read up on Bayesian inferences?![]()
When people use words that I don't understand, my eyes cross and I forget my name for 20 minutes.
I didn't even reply to you.mikeak":1rglulqh said:JimmyG":1rglulqh said:If you think Bevell is at fault, then give examples. seahawk12thman had a very strong, detailed, convincing post, with specific examples of why he felt that way. Your response -- which is becoming increasingly common around here lately when anyone responds about our OC -- was just mindlessly throwing Bevell under the bus without any excuse other than "he sucks". It's hackneyed and it discourages any meaningful discussion.Sports Hernia":1rglulqh said:With all due respect, you're wrong!seahawk12thman":1rglulqh said:Don't blame the Oline.
The Bengals put 8 in box to stop run..
Wilson had time to throw.
Watching the tape made me want to throw up.ukeface:
The Hawks should have easily won this game. For those of you that have the game recorder, watch the cushion Bengal DB's were giving our receivers (9-11 yards every play) including the 3rd and 4 play which would have given us the first down and win. WHY IN THE HELL WERE WE NOT THROWING BUBBLE SCREENS TO LOCKETT????? By not taking the yards the Bengals were giving us, we played to their strengths, since the Bengals could just bunch up 10 yards down the field giving Russell Wilson no passing lanes. THEY WERE GIVING US 5 YARDS A PLAY AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME AS WELL!!. No excuses, Wilson needs to audible and check down. This was not on Bevell. If our Quarterback can't recognize this then why is he spending all this time in the film room????
THIS LOSS IS ON WILSON!!!!!
End of Story.
The OC is the biggest problem this team has, even worse than the O-line.
In the 6 last possessions there was 6 punts. If you truley believe that's solely on exececution, then you are watching the game thru Bevell colored glasses.
The only specific thing you said was "6 possessions, 6 punts". Saying that's the OC's fault is far from a foregone conclusion. I watched the Dallas game today, and the Dallas offense was miserable. Do you think it's the OC's fault? No, I'd probably say it's because Weeden sucks.
I gave examples and they were ignored. Selective reading?
His best pass catcher is blocking on that play.Laloosh":3t1xoixr said:seahawk12thman":3t1xoixr said:Don't blame the Oline.
The Bengals put 8 in box to stop run..
Wilson had time to throw.
Watching the tape made me want to throw up.ukeface:
The Hawks should have easily won this game. For those of you that have the game recorder, watch the cushion Bengal DB's were giving our receivers (9-11 yards every play) including the 3rd and 4 play which would have given us the first down and win. WHY IN THE HELL WERE WE NOT THROWING BUBBLE SCREENS TO LOCKETT????? By not taking the yards the Bengals were giving us, we played to their strengths, since the Bengals could just bunch up 10 yards down the field giving Russell Wilson no passing lanes. THEY WERE GIVING US 5 YARDS A PLAY AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME AS WELL!!. No excuses, Wilson needs to audible and check down. This was not on Bevell. If our Quarterback can't recognize this then why is he spending all this time in the film room????
THIS LOSS IS ON WILSON!!!!!
End of Story.
I think you're exaggerating a bit. The 3rd and 4 for example. Wilson's first read was to Lockett's side but there were three defenders all within a few yards of the marker. The designed route is what the corner was waiting to jump (he's watching Wilson the entire time). To make matters worse, the DE is in Wilson's face in about 1 second. He has very little time to make a decision and rather than throw a pick six to a hitch route, he threw it where Kearse had a chance if he beats his man 1:1.
![]()
Sure, Russ could have audibled to a screen (or maybe he can't, I don't know) but he'd be throwing to a receiver with 1 blocker and three defenders to account for.
[edit] Seem to recall another 3rd and 4 later int he game. Will check so don't go all Hope Solo on me (and you did say all of the 3rd and 4th quarter).
Laloosh":35ysjkkz said:Here's the other 3rd and 4. As I said, I think the OP is exaggerating.
![]()
SeatownJay":anj8prbx said:There's one play I can't get over. In the 3rd quarter Russell goes deep to Lockett. Tyler makes the catch and is initially ruled inbounds for a 40 yard gain, but replay shows that he got one foot out of bounds. If Russ throws that ball more in the field instead of leading Lockett to the sideline it's not only a catch, but most likely a TD.
SeatownJay":2nt2rt4r said:There's one play I can't get over. In the 3rd quarter Russell goes deep to Lockett. Tyler makes the catch and is initially ruled inbounds for a 40 yard gain, but replay shows that he got one foot out of bounds. If Russ throws that ball more in the field instead of leading Lockett to the sideline it's not only a catch, but most likely a TD.
Laloosh":11ajxxun said:SeatownJay":11ajxxun said:There's one play I can't get over. In the 3rd quarter Russell goes deep to Lockett. Tyler makes the catch and is initially ruled inbounds for a 40 yard gain, but replay shows that he got one foot out of bounds. If Russ throws that ball more in the field instead of leading Lockett to the sideline it's not only a catch, but most likely a TD.
Not sure if you noticed but Russ can't even follow through on that throw. Also, looked like a really nice throw to me.
![]()
Scottemojo":3vdgpny5 said:His best pass catcher is blocking on that play.Laloosh":3vdgpny5 said:seahawk12thman":3vdgpny5 said:Don't blame the Oline.
The Bengals put 8 in box to stop run..
Wilson had time to throw.
Watching the tape made me want to throw up.ukeface:
The Hawks should have easily won this game. For those of you that have the game recorder, watch the cushion Bengal DB's were giving our receivers (9-11 yards every play) including the 3rd and 4 play which would have given us the first down and win. WHY IN THE HELL WERE WE NOT THROWING BUBBLE SCREENS TO LOCKETT????? By not taking the yards the Bengals were giving us, we played to their strengths, since the Bengals could just bunch up 10 yards down the field giving Russell Wilson no passing lanes. THEY WERE GIVING US 5 YARDS A PLAY AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME AS WELL!!. No excuses, Wilson needs to audible and check down. This was not on Bevell. If our Quarterback can't recognize this then why is he spending all this time in the film room????
THIS LOSS IS ON WILSON!!!!!
End of Story.
I think you're exaggerating a bit. The 3rd and 4 for example. Wilson's first read was to Lockett's side but there were three defenders all within a few yards of the marker. The designed route is what the corner was waiting to jump (he's watching Wilson the entire time). To make matters worse, the DE is in Wilson's face in about 1 second. He has very little time to make a decision and rather than throw a pick six to a hitch route, he threw it where Kearse had a chance if he beats his man 1:1.
![]()
Sure, Russ could have audibled to a screen (or maybe he can't, I don't know) but he'd be throwing to a receiver with 1 blocker and three defenders to account for.
[edit] Seem to recall another 3rd and 4 later int he game. Will check so don't go all Hope Solo on me (and you did say all of the 3rd and 4th quarter).
And throw interceptions.hawkporvida":961oxgpl said:Cause Wilson sucks !!! Bring back dave krieg at least he knows how to read a defense worthless wilson !!
Laloosh":1x50muoo said:seahawk12thman":1x50muoo said:Don't blame the Oline.
The Bengals put 8 in box to stop run..
Wilson had time to throw.
Watching the tape made me want to throw up.ukeface:
The Hawks should have easily won this game. For those of you that have the game recorder, watch the cushion Bengal DB's were giving our receivers (9-11 yards every play) including the 3rd and 4 play which would have given us the first down and win. WHY IN THE HELL WERE WE NOT THROWING BUBBLE SCREENS TO LOCKETT????? By not taking the yards the Bengals were giving us, we played to their strengths, since the Bengals could just bunch up 10 yards down the field giving Russell Wilson no passing lanes. THEY WERE GIVING US 5 YARDS A PLAY AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME AS WELL!!. No excuses, Wilson needs to audible and check down. This was not on Bevell. If our Quarterback can't recognize this then why is he spending all this time in the film room????
THIS LOSS IS ON WILSON!!!!!
End of Story.
I think you're exaggerating a bit. The 3rd and 4 for example. Wilson's first read was to Lockett's side but there were three defenders all within a few yards of the marker. The designed route is what the corner was waiting to jump (he's watching Wilson the entire time). To make matters worse, the DE is in Wilson's face in about 1 second. He has very little time to make a decision and rather than throw a pick six to a hitch route, he threw it where Kearse had a chance if he beats his man 1:1.
![]()
Sure, Russ could have audibled to a screen (or maybe he can't, I don't know) but he'd be throwing to a receiver with 1 blocker and three defenders to account for.
[edit] Seem to recall another 3rd and 4 later int he game. Will check so don't go all Hope Solo on me (and you did say all of the 3rd and 4th quarter).
Laloosh":2n397fsf said:seahawk12thman":2n397fsf said:Don't blame the Oline.
The Bengals put 8 in box to stop run..
Wilson had time to throw.
Watching the tape made me want to throw up.ukeface:
The Hawks should have easily won this game. For those of you that have the game recorder, watch the cushion Bengal DB's were giving our receivers (9-11 yards every play) including the 3rd and 4 play which would have given us the first down and win. WHY IN THE HELL WERE WE NOT THROWING BUBBLE SCREENS TO LOCKETT????? By not taking the yards the Bengals were giving us, we played to their strengths, since the Bengals could just bunch up 10 yards down the field giving Russell Wilson no passing lanes. THEY WERE GIVING US 5 YARDS A PLAY AND THIS HAPPENED IN THE RAMS GAME AS WELL!!. No excuses, Wilson needs to audible and check down. This was not on Bevell. If our Quarterback can't recognize this then why is he spending all this time in the film room????
THIS LOSS IS ON WILSON!!!!!
End of Story.
I think you're exaggerating a bit. The 3rd and 4 for example. Wilson's first read was to Lockett's side but there were three defenders all within a few yards of the marker. The designed route is what the corner was waiting to jump (he's watching Wilson the entire time). To make matters worse, the DE is in Wilson's face in about 1 second. He has very little time to make a decision and rather than throw a pick six to a hitch route, he threw it where Kearse had a chance if he beats his man 1:1.
![]()
Sure, Russ could have audibled to a screen (or maybe he can't, I don't know) but he'd be throwing to a receiver with 1 blocker and three defenders to account for.
[edit] Seem to recall another 3rd and 4 later int he game. Will check so don't go all Hope Solo on me (and you did say all of the 3rd and 4th quarter).
seahawk12thman":xyg2plp4 said:The DB at the top was at least 9 yards off the receiver and was backpedaling every play. if he had done a stop and start 3 yards off the line of scrimmage he would have had an easy first down. Again, this went on the whole game.
Laloosh":27lxxnxz said:seahawk12thman":27lxxnxz said:The DB at the top was at least 9 yards off the receiver and was backpedaling every play. if he had done a stop and start 3 yards off the line of scrimmage he would have had an easy first down. Again, this went on the whole game.
Everybody understands (and has said) that different routes could have been more effective against that coverage. The difference is that you're claiming that the fault lies with Wilson for not changing the play to a screen rather than the hitch for example. In that particular play, the defense shows blitz and then the safety drops into coverage, expecting something like the screen I'd imagine.
In both of the examples (including the one you pointed out specifically), a screen could have easily been a pick six or TFL at the very least. The corners were looking for it.
How about the OC calls plays with routes that will beat the soft coverage, you know, since it was happening "all game"?
BTW, that DB was reading the QB the entire time. He was waiting to jump that route.