hawkpride
Active member
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 361
- Reaction score
- 125
Adams in coverage should never ever be an option, this is on the coaches for letting that play happen....
Somewhere some reporter's wife is laughing her ass
I can answer this.When "How many TDs will Adams get burned for this week?" is the question, PC has a lot to answer for.
Yes. But they have this thing called a Defensive Lineman for that. It keeps the tiny guys from missing half their careers due to injury.I have watched Adams the last few games. His time has come and gone. He can rush but cannot do shit on deep coverage.
But I on this forum many times that Adams was just fine in coverage. He just needed to learn to catch the INTs with his face mask.I have watched Adams the last few games. His time has come and gone. He can rush but cannot do shit on deep coverage.
Run the 3 4 and put Adams on the outside....it is the best use of him. Pete needs to realize he doesn't have all world safeties anymore. You can't make them, they are born badass.. like KamI have watched Adams the last few games. His time has come and gone. He can rush but cannot do shit on deep coverage.
This'll ^^^^Adams is a one trick pony and he’s not even doing that one trick well.