BASF
Well-known member
FattyKnuckle":1gqrcdky said:hannibalking":1gqrcdky said:Shouldn't have thrown the ball or blown a 10 point lead, but then again the Packers shouldn't have blown a 12 point lead with less than 4 minutes left in the NFC Championship game.
Throwing the ball isn't an inherently bad move there. Everyone expected Lynch to get the ball so you can get the DBs to take a bad step or two with a good play action. Plus you've got the most mobile QB in the league at the time that's a threat to run it in. Play action bootleg fools the D at first. Russ is on the move and if the D sticks to their receivers he has a chance to run in. If they break off and go for him, someone is open. If it's a busted play then you sail it out of the endzone and you have time for 2-3 more plays. Motion your RB out of the backfield so there's no play action? Count on picking a LB masquerading as a CB? Throw it into the middle third of the field to a 5th string, undrafted WR who is only on the team because of special teams?
I got no problem with passing the ball there. It would've neatly taken advantage of conventional wisdom. But running that play to that side of the field to that WR... not how you become a dynasty. And we saw how that play eroded the team, especially on the defensive side. Any time you have Kam and Avril even talking about it, you know it's serious.
The biggest issue was running the play they did. We only run one route out of that formation. Anyone who watches film knows that, and of course Browner who probably practiced against that play hundreds of times with us definitely knew it. This is the major failure of Darrell Bevell and why he should have been fired, if he had modified that play from that formation to a flat route by Lockette with Browner shoving Kearse into Butler has an easy pitch and catch from Wilson with no one within five yards of Lockette. The team is ecstatic and maybe we keep it together for a few more seasons and win more than just those two Super Bowls.