If we lose at SF while they are still on a win streak, things could get very hairy. In fact, it looks like we will lose the division if both teams win out from here on out except we lose at SF. It would really suck to NOT be the division winner with a 14-2 record.
If we lose to the 49ers while they continue winning out, both teams will have lost to the Colts, and to each other. Those would both be draws. If the 49ers continue having a higher strength of victory, which is defined by the win/loss records of the opponents a team has beaten, then we are hosed in this scenario. Remember, strength of victory can't be calculated properly until the regular season is over; you base it on how teams actually ended up doing once the season is done, even though everyone uses it as a future indicator to guess how hard a schedule is going into the next season.
While at this point it's possible Seattle might be able to get a higher strength of victory rating than the 49ers, it's looking very unlikely based on remaining opponents for both teams. We face 7 more teams that currently have losing records, the 49ers face 6; and they're already ahead based on strength of victory.
If both the Seahawks and 49ers finish 14-2 and the second loss for the Seahawks came at SF, we lose the division. I just checked through how this would play out, and we'd have the same win percentage against both common opponents and conference ones, so...Crap.
I didn't realize this, but if the 49ers win out including winning over us, they will win the division, despite being a game behind us right now. This is not good. (Assuming their strength of victory remains higher, which is almost guaranteed based on remaining opponents.)
@Volsung: Yeah, I realized that after I said it.
@Dtowers: The opposite. I am a confirmed Apple hater, so one day Throwdown was (jokingly) angry with me, he called me iRoland, and it stuck mainly because SacHawk2.0 is a huge troll and kept repeating it everywhere.
