falcongoggles":2xtzbstk said:From a statistics standpoint it was a bad call. Even with the woes of our field goal unit, the probability of making an extra point are exponentially higher than converting a 2-point attempt.
By kicking the extra point you are in effect taking the 2-point attempt and putting that statistical improbability on NE.
Great poker players win money because they play the odds. Pete did not and we saw what happened.
Seafan":1orajpf9 said:Stupid call. The Hawks were frequently out coached in this game as expected. Thankfully the team outplayed the Pats.
Hawks46":2aq38r1e said:I'm ok with it.
If you don't, you're still up by 7 and almost no coach goes for 2 to win the game at the end.
falcongoggles":2ispfskb said:From a statistics standpoint it was a bad call. Even with the woes of our field goal unit, the probability of making an extra point are exponentially higher than converting a 2-point attempt.
By kicking the extra point you are in effect taking the 2-point attempt and putting that statistical improbability on NE.
Great poker players win money because they play the odds. Pete did not and we saw what happened.
slateman77":2rvkr6om said:Totally disagree with the call....makes Hauschka feel like he can't be depended upon in crucial game ending scenarios...need to increase his confidence...not deter it ..The percentage of the kick is very high compared to a 2 point conversion.....Either way I thought we played one hell of a game...Go Hawks..!! :2thumbs:
soje":2430ygon said:That call alone was horrible. Combine it with not going for the 2 point conversion when we scored the first TD (we missed the extra point, by the way) and it makes it horrendous.
soje":1taq8ptd said:That call alone was horrible. Combine it with not going for the 2 point conversion when we scored the first TD (we missed the extra point, by the way) and it makes it horrendous.