Zebulon Dak
Banned
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2007
- Messages
- 24,551
- Reaction score
- 1,417
east coast bias!
Meedsy":pwabgej4 said:This thread is really making me chuckle to myself. It really isn't that hard to grasp :shock:
Coxal":27bhz1ey said:It will be 7PM here in France
Primetime game (8.30PM) is 2.30AM for me and finish at around 5.30AM... Always have a hard time on Monday morning with 3 hours of sleep.
Hate my country.
AirForceSeahawk":5vtv3t4r said:In terms of the kickoff time, the Seahawks and Redskins kicked off at 1:30 p.m. last weekend, the normal start time games in Seattle. The Seahawks finished 8-0 at home, but were just 4-5 on the road this season. But only one win, Chicago, came with the 10 a.m. kickoff time. In fact, the overtime victory over the Bears was the Seahawks' lone 10 a.m. win in the last five seasons.
SharkHawk":amutpyj9 said:The NFL has actually admitted this is a problem and has promised to address it. For those of you saying it's a joke and yadda yadda... athletes are on a very particular schedule, and it shows in west coast teams playing the 10 AM Pacific time games on the east coast. Sando actually did a lot of work showing that west coast teams did more poorly on the east coast, than vice-versa. What's the difference? They both travel the same distance. The big issue is time.
The east coast teams were able to throw a fit last year and the NFL changed scheduling for the benefit of east coast teams (specifically the Giants) who didn't feel it was fair to have to travel west 2 out of 3 weeks, because of jet lag. However, in the playoffs of all things, they have the Hawks travel east two weeks in a row (which was unavoidable due to seeding), but the NFL could have made a deal with the broadcasters that in such a situation the team traveling across the country would get a few extra hours. Instead, since it is the "least important" game, then it gets the worst time slot. In a situation like the NFL discussed doing for west coast teams (and hasn't implemented yet) they could basically 'flex' a game that didn't make much sense and the broadcasters would be damned and have to accept it.
There was even a discussion (the first one that I really was on Roger's side for) that no west coast team would ever play the 10 AM game when going east. They would set the schedule up so the west coast team was always playing at their normal time, and it was later on the east coast. 10 AM pacific games, would be set aside for east coast teams playing east coast teams, or east coast playing teams in the central time zone. People have shown how the schedule would work fine while doing so. The NFL is in such a power position that they no longer need to force games into early broadcast slots during the regular season. There is coverage and fans are happy to watch games later in the day as they draw better ratings the later in the day they take place.
peachesenregalia":ro4tnink said:most other people hate your country, too.
Ha! I'm kidding. No, I....I quite like France...
:thirishdrinkers: Excellent mon ami !!peachesenregalia":2jq0y1ol said:Je ne sais pas. Les Etats unis sont fou.
Viva la France!
falcongoggles":1dppca9x said:SharkHawk":1dppca9x said:The NFL has actually admitted this is a problem and has promised to address it. For those of you saying it's a joke and yadda yadda... athletes are on a very particular schedule, and it shows in west coast teams playing the 10 AM Pacific time games on the east coast. Sando actually did a lot of work showing that west coast teams did more poorly on the east coast, than vice-versa. What's the difference? They both travel the same distance. The big issue is time.
The east coast teams were able to throw a fit last year and the NFL changed scheduling for the benefit of east coast teams (specifically the Giants) who didn't feel it was fair to have to travel west 2 out of 3 weeks, because of jet lag. However, in the playoffs of all things, they have the Hawks travel east two weeks in a row (which was unavoidable due to seeding), but the NFL could have made a deal with the broadcasters that in such a situation the team traveling across the country would get a few extra hours. Instead, since it is the "least important" game, then it gets the worst time slot. In a situation like the NFL discussed doing for west coast teams (and hasn't implemented yet) they could basically 'flex' a game that didn't make much sense and the broadcasters would be damned and have to accept it.
There was even a discussion (the first one that I really was on Roger's side for) that no west coast team would ever play the 10 AM game when going east. They would set the schedule up so the west coast team was always playing at their normal time, and it was later on the east coast. 10 AM pacific games, would be set aside for east coast teams playing east coast teams, or east coast playing teams in the central time zone. People have shown how the schedule would work fine while doing so. The NFL is in such a power position that they no longer need to force games into early broadcast slots during the regular season. There is coverage and fans are happy to watch games later in the day as they draw better ratings the later in the day they take place.
Standby to be told by Roland that "jetlag" is psychosomatic and that people who "suffer" from it are wimps and hypochondriacs.
I agree with everything you say and the NFL should try and rectify the situation if you ask me.
Seahawk Sailor":2vsbn8x8 said:I'll believe changes when I see them. Goodell has done nothing at all to assure me any changes to level the east/west playing field will ever happen.
This game, the Seahawks are staying away from the city in a secluded hotel. No distractions. I like it.
Bill Wixey/ Q13 Fox @BillWixey
#Seahawks arrive in #Atlanta tomorrow, staying at Stone Mtn Ctr. Spacious, Scenic, secluded. 30 mi from ATL. #GoHawks
index.php
![]()
I'm sure your french is better than my english! Anyway I perfeclty understand youpeachesenregalia":29cjynz6 said:Coxal":29cjynz6 said::thirishdrinkers: Excellent mon ami !!peachesenregalia":29cjynz6 said:Je ne sais pas. Les Etats unis sont fou.
Viva la France!
Merci. Ma Français est mal, je suis desolé.
C'est ma plaisir!
falcongoggles":1faba29h said:Standby to be told by Roland that "jetlag" is psychosomatic and that people who "suffer" from it are wimps and hypochondriacs.
I agree with everything you say and the NFL should try and rectify the situation if you ask me.
SharkHawk":1faba29h said:I could care less.... because I only mentioned jet-lag as the excuse that east coast teams used for their complaint about having to travel to the west. The NFL used that reasoning for changing the way they schedule east coast teams having to travel to the west.
I have traveled the world and since I am an insomniac I didn't experience anything I'd call "jet-lag". What I did experience was confusion about my daily routines, and would have difficulty with things such as my "quiet time" which I am used to having from 9 PM to 5 AM since that is when my family sleeps. When I am looking for "quiet time" and it is the middle of the day and I've got to go get something to eat because that's when places are open then it throws me off. Psychosomatic or not, I could care less. It doesn't mean I don't experience it. A psychosomatic response or a genuine organic response can still have the same impact on a human body. It seemed to in the case of the Giants, hence their whining and a change taking place to NFL scheduling.