Is it me or why didn’t they just franchise Walker?

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
4,086
I get that he would’ve cost $14 million but for one year, coming off of a Super Bowl, in my opinion they should’ve just gone that route. They had to spend their first round pick on a running back that nobody is really sure what he is going to do. Would rather have had the sure thing in Walker at running back and have been able to use the first round pick on another need.
 

stang233

Active member
Joined
Oct 28, 2013
Messages
464
Reaction score
186
I would have rather had Walker and Boston or another weapon. Hell Walker and price. I think Walker wanted out as much as Hawks didn’t want to tag him
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
4,086
What would be different? They have cap space now to extend spoon and sign some veteran FA. They also have a good rb.
What would be different is you’d have a proven running back going into the season after winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think there’s any way the Seahawks would’ve made it to the Super Bowl without Walker last year. On top of that, you could use that first round pick on something other than a running back. That’s the difference.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
6,352
Reaction score
2,502
What would be different is you’d have a proven running back going into the season after winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think there’s any way the Seahawks would’ve made it to the Super Bowl without Walker last year. On top of that, you could use that first round pick on something other than a running back. That’s the difference.
Walker's TD burst vs the Rams in that 39-38 game, a play only Walker could make. That and his game vs Stealers. We don't win that Lombardi without Walker or without Shaheed. Price could have what it takes to replace Walker's impact He might get tackled at the 5 or 10 on 2 long TD runs Walker would have housed. But still he will help the Seahawks be in position to score. He might be more like Rashaad Penny during Penny's 5 game historic run of 5 straight140-yard-plus games.
 

Chevy

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 3, 2022
Messages
938
Reaction score
901
What would be different is you’d have a proven running back going into the season after winning the Super Bowl. I don’t think there’s any way the Seahawks would’ve made it to the Super Bowl without Walker last year. On top of that, you could use that first round pick on something other than a running back. That’s the difference.

It doesn't sound like he wanted to be here spliting carries, he may have wanted to be the lead dog. Plus its not best to keep a disgruntled player on the team and he has been injury prone.

With hindsight, it's best that we didn't keep K9. The way the draft played out in the 1st round, our prospect fits were pretty much wiped out; (CB) Chris Johnson, (OG) Keylan Rutledge, (DE) Keldric Faulk, and (DE) Malachi Lawrence were all gone.

We got Bud Clark a ballhawking (S/CB) in the 2nd round, Julian Neal a big physical CB in the 3rd round, and (OG) Beau Stevens a starting calibre physical run blocking stud in the 5th round.
 

Bobblehead

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
5,611
Reaction score
2,213
I would have rather had Walker and Boston or another weapon. Hell Walker and price. I think Walker wanted out as much as Hawks didn’t want to tag him
He wanted out, cause JS was pretty non committal about Walkers future with the Hawks. Further, K9 wants to be the main back.
 

therealjohncarlson

Well-known member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
4,681
Reaction score
510
I get that he would’ve cost $14 million but for one year, coming off of a Super Bowl, in my opinion they should’ve just gone that route. They had to spend their first round pick on a running back that nobody is really sure what he is going to do. Would rather have had the sure thing in Walker at running back and have been able to use the first round pick on another need.

I feel like like when you’re continuing to build and keep a championship roster team building becomes even more important to me. Makes sense to me that we would want to get a new fresh RB lm a relatively cheap contract and save the money on other positions of need that we need to re sign
 

Pandion Haliaetus

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 16, 2013
Messages
4,137
Reaction score
1,252
1. Walker was low-key butt hurt about sharing half the snaps with Charbs especially in a contract year except he’s very much shown he’s very much the type of RB that needs to be managed throughout the season then perhaps unleashed down the stretch . And he’s horrible as a blocker and good but not elite as a WR.

2. Honestly, felt Kyren Williams type contract was the max they were willing to go but hinging on guaranteed money. Williams got $23 out of $33 but is more complete overall player. Walker at almost $29 at up to $45 with reason 1 is like pass. Like if it was a $40/$20 gtd kind of deal it might have been more reasonable.

Same with Bryant, dont think Seahawks had an issue with $13 per year (including incentives) but his guaranteed money was practically doubled than what Julian Love got and Love is the better player of the two… it just would have just caused issues.

3. My reading comprehension sucks as im jumping site to site for UDFAs and more insights on Henderson, Eastern, and the last pick. Missed key word of OP’s title in “franchise”.


4. Walker doesn’t necessarily run with the best patience and vision behind his blocking scheme but once Outten took over RBs and probably Run Game Coordinating we saw less FB, mo Bobo, and the TEs were used less and less in the passing game and more so in run blocking department. That opened up more outside lanes for Walker but you also could see Outten in his ear several times just coaching him up probably keeping him grounded probably telling him to trust the blocks and when to and where to mash his speed button. This is a little maybe a lot of projecting on my part but feels like Walker’s own decision making was hit or miss and he needed to be somewhat micromanaged in the mental department much like Woolen.

5. He probably wanted to not only get his bag but likely play closer to home.
 

TheLegendOfBoom

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2015
Messages
4,252
Reaction score
3,072
Location
Westcoastin’
There is something to be said about a program allowing a player to see what their worth is outside of the team they played with. You are somewhat “doing right by them” for NOT franchising the player. Alot of players do not want to be franchise tagged cause it’s only one year and if they get their value lowers substantially.

I’d respect a team more if they said look go see what you can make out there cause we don’t want to hold you back from obtaining a multiple year deal and higher/more guaranteed money, instead of returning for a one year deal only.

I think Seattle ultimately did right by Walker and it allowed Walker to explore what options he has instead of Seattle forcing the franchise tag on him. When players are franchised, the collective insight/thought is for the team to work on an extension after.

Just remember, at one point, Walker, was an unknown as well. You don’t know what he has to offer in the NFL. And at some point, you’re going to have to play a new unknown player at some point and you gotta trust your process of evaluating the college tape and trusting that your coaches and scheme can bring out the best in the player.

Seattle made the right move cause Walker benefitted substantially cash wise moving on and Seattle benefitted cause they can reallocate that salary they would have otherwise had to pay Walker.
 

daveCFPrez

Active member
Joined
Apr 11, 2013
Messages
453
Reaction score
53
Walker was a huge reason we had the success we did. But he was pretty "fresh" long in to the season by splitting the RB chores.
What happened the last few years he was the featured back?? Injuries.
He won't last a whole season as the featured back in KC.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
43,998
Reaction score
28,079
Location
Sammamish, WA
Meh. He's gone, we're good. Price is gonna be a beast. Liked Walker a lot, but not at the coin he is getting. John turned TWO rosters into SB winning teams. I have no desire to question him at this point. It's not his first rodeo....or second.
 
Last edited:

Jac

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
1,804
Walker's always going to be part of Seahawks lore because of that stretch run and Super Bowl MVP. But teams in their window fall out of their window because they refuse to refresh their roster and manage their payroll. I think the preference is always to have your running backs young, fresh, and cheap (unless you have a generational talent that you have to give a second contract to). Having Walker on a franchise tag would be a HUGE distraction, while Price is going to draw a huge amount of interest NFL-wide to see what he can do with the SB champs. Aside, I don't think any of us will be surprised if news comes out of KC that Walker is dealing with an injury by week #3.
 
OP
OP
seabowl

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
4,086
Walker's always going to be part of Seahawks lore because of that stretch run and Super Bowl MVP. But teams in their window fall out of their window because they refuse to refresh their roster and manage their payroll. I think the preference is always to have your running backs young, fresh, and cheap (unless you have a generational talent that you have to give a second contract to). Having Walker on a franchise tag would be a HUGE distraction, while Price is going to draw a huge amount of interest NFL-wide to see what he can do with the SB champs. Aside, I don't think any of us will be surprised if news comes out of KC that Walker is dealing with an injury by week #3.
What huge distraction would he have been on a franchise tag? There’s a window right now of opportunity and probably your second best producing play on offense last year and the key player that helped win the SB is on another team and you are filling that with a rookie. I’m not saying that Price can’t do it, but it’s a big risk. Also, if they just franchised Walker, he’d be on another prove it one year deal where it’s obviously in his best interest to perform at his best and stay as healthy as possible. I understand the points that people made that he maybe didn’t want to be here because of having to share time, but the dude again iwill still need to perform if he wants to get really paid going further.
 

Hotchy

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 15, 2010
Messages
323
Reaction score
376
Location
Maine
Walker had an incredible playoff run last year. All the carries beforehand ? Not worthy of a new big deal, let alone the #1 back spot.
Price is a better fit, youll see. Id even place a bet Price has more all purpose yards than Walker at the end of the upcoming season.

Also, everyone keeps saying we dont win without him. Thats a dumb ass statement. If the shoe was on the other foot, and Walker was hurt and Charbonnet was hammering the ball as the only back, we still win. If Walker and Zach both healthy, they split carries and we still win. K9 was only a small piece of a great team
 
Last edited:

Jac

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
1,804
What huge distraction would he have been on a franchise tag? There’s a window right now of opportunity and probably your second best producing play on offense last year and the key player that helped win the SB is on another team and you are filling that with a rookie. I’m not saying that Price can’t do it, but it’s a big risk. Also, if they just franchised Walker, he’d be on another prove it one year deal where it’s obviously in his best interest to perform at his best and stay as healthy as possible. I understand the points that people made that he maybe didn’t want to be here because of having to share time, but the dude again iwill still need to perform if he wants to get really paid going further.

Would Walker have signed and played on a franchise tag? Breece Hall isn't attending the Jets voluntary activities right now, and I doubt he attends training camp without a new expensive multiyear deal. I don't think there's any scenario where Walker comes back on a prove-it one-year deal. He'll be one year older at a position with a short shelf life.
 

Latest posts

Top