Hawks OC Search

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
3,667
Location
Oregon Wine Region
As the SB fog settles, it's kinda weird to have the short runway to the 2026 kickoff (Combine, FA, & Draft). In recent seasons, a plethra of threads were already in process due to early outs. This year, the OC search takes pole position in the post-season interests. We had it last year when they let Grubb go, but that was about gutting what existed and starting fresh. This year it's about sustaining continuity...which in some ways might be more difficult, depending on who Kubiak takes to Vegas.

The internal candidates are fairly well known: 4 In-House Candidates Interviewing for OC

IMO, Janocko probably provides the smoothest transition. It could be challenging to break him off from Kubs, but he might not be a play calling OC in Vegas, which would be a reason to stay in Seattle. Not having to start from ground zero, culture, and organizational leadership are also unique advantages.

If Janocko leaves, Peetz might be another option as he's not a Kubiak tag-along. They liked him enough to keep post Grubb debacle, so it probably depends on how much he picked up from the Kubs system.

This is the 1st outside cadidate I've seen get an interview: Hawks to Interview Senger from Cardinals
Not that I think the cards have much to give in terms of coaches...but Senger appears to be a solid candidate a few years down the road. He's young (30), but seems to have a high regard from those that have worked with him. Maybe an opportunity to add him to the staff in another capacity. It'd be a no brainer on his part to work with the Hawks over the Cards.
 
Last edited:

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,033
Reaction score
7,008
As the SB fog settles, it's kinda weird to have the short runway to the 2026 kickoff (Combine, FA, & Draft). In recent seasons, a plethra of threads were already in process due to early outs. This year, the OC search takes pole position in the post-season interests. We had it last year when they let Grubb go, but that was about gutting what existed and starting fresh. This year it's about sustaing continuity...which in some ways might be more difficult, depending on who Kubiak takes to Vegas.

The internal candidates are fairly well known: 4 In-House Candidates Interviewing for OC

IMO, Janocko probably provides the smoothest transition. It could be challenging to break him off from Kubs, but he might not be a play calling OC in Vegas, which would be a reason to stay in Seattle. Not having to start from ground zero, culture, and organizational leadership are also unique advantages.

If Janocko leaves, Peetz might be another option as he's not a Kubiak tag-along. They liked him enough to keep post Grubb debacle, so it probably depends on how much he picked up from the Kubs system.

This is the 1st outside cadidate I've seen get an interview: Hawks to Interview Senger from Cardinals
Not that I think the cards have much to give in terms of coaches...but Senger appears to be a solid candidate a few years down the road. He's young (30), but seems to have a high regard from those that have worked with him. Maybe an opportunity to add him to the staff in another capacity. It'd be a no brainer on his part to work with the Hawks over the Cards.

Take a look at this :

 
OP
OP
LeveeBreak

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
3,667
Location
Oregon Wine Region
Yep, saw that right after I posted. Sounds like a good move...maybe a forshadow of keeping Janocko.

The drama unfolds!
 

JPatera76

Administrator
Administrator
Moderator
Joined
Nov 29, 2015
Messages
9,723
Reaction score
9,656
Being Seattle is blocking requests it seems.. yay for us. I’m willing to bet with how long it took to establish a run game (what half a season almost we heard Mike mentioned trying to get it established) I feel like they weren’t sold on Klint for the long term. He was the best option available at the time and we rode with it, it worked (greatly) but not quite what they’re looking for.
 
Top