I pretty much agree, but not completely.
Wagner is a lock, no bout a doubt it. Sherman? Probably, but I wouldn't call him a lock.
Earl's resume looks a lot like Sherman's: Sherm has 5 Pro Bowls, Earl 7. Sherm had 3x First Team All Pro, same with Earl. Sherm had two-2nd team All Pro, same as Earl. Both were elected to the All-Decade team and, of course, both have one ring and 2 SB appearances. IMO both should get in, but depending on who else is in their class, maybe not on the first ballot. And yeah, a lot of people soured on Earl. You don't flip off your head coach, the guy that enabled you to be a star in this league. But I still think he gets in.
Kam's resume is weak. No First Team All Pro, 2-2nd team All Pro, and 4 Pro Bowls. Plus, his career was shorter than the others. Like Beast, he has an uphill battle.
Russell was borderline when he left here. He never got one single vote for league MVP, which for a quarterback says something. Those are the same type of people voting on the HOF. He needed another Lombardi/SB MVP or league MVP even before he fell off the cliff. Seahawks ROH is as good as he'll get.
Similar story with Pete. There are too many other coaches, Tom Coughlin for one, that have better resumes. He also coached in the same era with Belichick and Reid. He, too, needed another Lombardi. Now it's a snowball's chance in hell.