Does anyone understand what this stat is trying to say?

seabowl

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 16, 2009
Messages
6,298
Reaction score
4,086

The way I read it was, it says the Seahawks are the youngest team since starting the franchise to have won a Super Bowl. If it was only 33 years after their start that would’ve been 2008. Also, didn’t the Buccaneers win it well before Seattle?
 

Jac

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,916
Reaction score
1,804
That's the way I read it. And you're 100% on the Bucs. Anyway, the data seems weird with so much bunching around the 30's.
 

LeveeBreak

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2022
Messages
2,863
Reaction score
3,667
Location
Oregon Wine Region
The math doesn't line up, so "age" prob means something different. Multiple teams are on it 2+ times and the Bears as a franchise were way older than 32 & 183 days when they won it.

Could be the avg age of players on the team? 32 seems old, for the youngest team, but I don't have the list of ages to verify.
 

sutz

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
33,605
Reaction score
11,407
Location
Kent, WA
The math doesn't line up, so "age" prob means something different. Multiple teams are on it 2+ times and the Bears as a franchise were way older than 32 & 183 days when they won it.

Could be the avg age of players on the team? 32 seems old, for the youngest team, but I don't have the list of ages to verify.
Maybe they included the coaches? Yeah, 32 seems way old for the players.
 

Latest posts

Top