Sperrydogg
Well-known member
- Joined
- Oct 1, 2023
- Messages
- 8,106
- Reaction score
- 6,332
17 1/2 sacks. What was that? More than Mafe, hall, and didn’t he say Demarcus Lawrence combined?
Pipe dram? He’s available and we have the space and necessary trade collateral.. I say pull the trigger.This is pipe dream stuff.
Who wouldn't want the #1 pass rusher in the NFL as far as sacks are concerned (over the past two seasons)? All in all I just can't see the team paying him what he'd want or satisfying the first round pick requirement that Cinncie would want for the player.
Yeah right… do that trade immediately….Dunlap only cost us a backup center and a 7. Bengals are looking for a 1. I'd send them Mafe and Fant.
He’s not that much older than Michael Bennett was in 2013Too old,
Right. I’m kinda shocked the bengals are willing to let him go. I wonder if it has anything to do with paying wide receivers.Not the same as the Jamal trade at all. He isn't pushing his way off the team. He plays an actual critically important position that deserves big money for big production and you don't have to wonder how exactly your going to use him.
I would have zero problem parting with a second and giving him a good contract.
Right. I’m kinda shocked the bengals are willing to let him go. I wonder if it has anything to do with paying wide receivers.
Kinda goes to show how allocation of resources can really affect a team. Bengals have the top qb (debatable I know) and top wr room and they aren’t that big of a threat to win it all in my eyes
football age wise 27 compared to 30 is pretty large. Dropoff can be pretty fast at that age.He’s not that much older than Michael Bennett was in 2013
He is one the best D ends in the game and it is because of a very powerful bull rush and good hand usage.football age wise 27 compared to 30 is pretty large. Dropoff can be pretty fast at that age.
anybody know advanced pressure stats etc? Cinci D sucks and their offense was awesome. they are in quite a lot of shootouts. He probably gets a ton of pass rush opportunities. All sacks aren't created equal. I really have no idea, I have never watched Cinci play
What does that have to do with how damn good Hendrickson is?Bengals have to score 35 points to have a chance at winning a game. Their defense is horrible.
They’re not willing to let him go…just don’t want to renegotiate his deal.Right. I’m kinda shocked the bengals are willing to let him go. I wonder if it has anything to do with paying wide receivers.
Kinda goes to show how allocation of resources can really affect a team. Bengals have the top qb (debatable I know) and top wr room and they aren’t that big of a threat to win it all in my eyes
He’s the real deal. High motor. Usually double teamed.football age wise 27 compared to 30 is pretty large. Dropoff can be pretty fast at that age.
anybody know advanced pressure stats etc? Cinci D sucks and their offense was awesome. they are in quite a lot of shootouts. He probably gets a ton of pass rush opportunities. All sacks aren't created equal. I really have no idea, I have never watched Cinci play
I would not be keen on the Seahawks signing Hendrickson.Turns 31 in December, wants a long-term deal, but...Man. That production.
![]()
Seattle Seahawks' D isn't elite, but trade could change that
Reigning NFL sack leader Trey Hendrickson wants out of Cincinnati. Mike Salks feels the Seattle Seahawks should be ready to make a deal.sports.mynorthwest.com
What does that have to do with how damn good Hendrickson is?
Right. I’m kinda shocked the bengals are willing to let him go. I wonder if it has anything to do with paying wide receivers.
Kinda goes to show how allocation of resources can really affect a team. Bengals have the top qb (debatable I know) and top wr room and they aren’t that big of a threat to win it all in my eyes
Yeah he seams like that Jared Allen type where the older they get the stronger they getHe is one the best D ends in the game and it is because of a very powerful bull rush and good hand usage.
He doesn't rely on elite speed. Many D ends are effective in their 30's and he will be good for a few more years most likely.
I think it’s a lot different than von miller. Von had 9 sacks in ‘21 and 8 in ‘22 before he got injured after 11 games. Hendrickson had 17 1/2 last year. And I agree to sign some of our guys but Hendrickson would be a formidable force on our line.I would not be keen on the Seahawks signing Hendrickson.
1. He is under contract. It sends the wrong signal rewarding guys that signed a contract but then break his word.
2. It's the equivalent of Buffalo signing Von miller in 2022. How much tread is left on the tire?
3. Spend the money signing our guys; Ken Walker, Abe Lucas, Boye Mafe and Riq Woolin.
that wasn't an argument, I was asking for info.The only argument against him that I’ve heard so far that I buy a little is the idea that the bengals are involved in a lot of shoot outs which could’ve helped raise that sack number, someone said not all sacks are the same, but you could put Boye Mafe Derrick hall and even von miller’s sack totals together and still not get to 17 1/2
you can look up ages on the internet. he is 30A #1 for a 32 year old![]()