More Changes Coming In TV Broadcasting Of NFL Games

OP
OP
RiverDog

RiverDog

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 8, 2013
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
3,912
Location
Kennewick, WA
No, I'm talking about the air travel experience having gotten so much worse over the years. It used to be you bought a ticket and that included all bags checked in, a meal, soda pop, etc.., and to top it off, you could show up a half hour before your flight, breeze right to the gate and aboard. Nowadays they nickel and dime you to death for everything, the entire experience much much worse than when I was younger.
Ahh, OK. Sorry for the misunderstanding. It makes a little more sense now that you've straightened me out.

I'm pretty neutral on the overall air travel experience. I wish they would allow one checked bag for free like they used to as it has resulted in longer boarding and de-boarding times as everybody brings their carry-on to store in the overhead. And I agree with all the nickel and diming for stupid stuff like choosing your seat or boarding early. They're doing it to lower their fares. So as far as the flying experience goes, I agree with you.

But on the other hand, as far as I am concerned living in the Tri Cities, I have lots better options for a better price than I ever had before. When I first moved here in 1989, you could drive to Seattle or Portland, pay to park your car, and fly Southwest vs. flying out of Pasco on Alaska. Alaska and Delta had monopolies: Alaska for everything on the west coast, Delta for anything east of the Rockies. All they flew direct to was SEA and SLC. Now, they've added United and American along with the el cheapo Allegiant and Avelo, giving us direct flights to SFO, DEN, MSP, LAX, LAS and PHX. Today, both Alaska and Delta fly into SEA. And, due to the increased competition, the prices are very close to what it costs to fly out of SEA or PDX. So, from my POV, the service has improved tenfold.

I wish the airline industry would get together and agree to some minimum standards, like allowing one checked bag, forcing all the airlines to bake into their fares the cost of handling the additional checked bags. However, from my POV, I'm lots happier with the service we get vs. what it was 25-30 years ago and is worth the relatively minor inconveniences like the cluster phuck boarding and deboarding process.
 
Last edited:

jeremiah

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
484
How does it save money?

When games were on ABC, NBC, CBS, and Fox, you just need basic cable or YouTube TV subscription to get all the games. Now you need that plus a subscription to Peacock, Amazon, Netflix, and Paramount.
You put up with commercials because they paid the freight for the broadcast. NOW, you get commercials and you have to pay out the hoglixm to do that. 250+ a month for streaming plus internet. We are all suckers. The worst part is, the Networks hold broadcasting licenses to put a signal out to antennas, yet they cut it back so the only signal I can get is 13 FOX, CBS is very weak, so I have to subscribe to a streaming service. Old Fogies have a point, all of you suckers are paying the equivalent of ticket to a game every month, because REAL seats are triple of that for two in the nosebleed section.
 

jeremiah

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 3, 2013
Messages
1,117
Reaction score
484
You Tube and NFL ticket which I had for the first and last time are not
what I consider cheap.
I found a way cheaper alternative and my previous free streamer is back
again.
The NFL can go stick it because they are NOT getting any more of my $$$.
What are you using? Us "OLD FOGIES" or I should say I, cannot afford to be a fan. If it is not on Peacock, Paramount or OTA on 13, I am SOL. I can't stretch it out further than that. I barely get to watch NCAA games.
 

Trackhawk

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
25
Reaction score
25
I’m, thankfully, in a financial position that the cost of the having multiple streaming services is not a problem. (Of course the fact that I am the type to not have multiple streaming services, despite being able to easily afford them, might be part of why I am in this financial position to begin with.)

The issue for me is that I don’t want to have to try and figure out which streaming service is airing which game on any given day. Worse, trying to figure out if it is a streaming service that allows me to cast the signal to my TV, so I can have several friends over for a watch party.

I used to do the Sunday Ticket thing, but it just wasn’t worth it. Now, if I want to watch football with a group, we just go to a sports bar, which is probably what the NFL prefers. Higher revenues for them and the bars.

The NFL could help, somewhat, by having a portal on their homepage, that lists every game, with where it will be broadcast/ streamed, with a link to the game stream for the streamed games.
 

Trackhawk

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
25
Reaction score
25
Let's put a pencil to this. When I was growing up in the 60's, we got to see two games a week for free. Well, it really wasn't free as I lived in Walla Walla and the OTA TV signal wasn't very strong, so my parents bought a cable subscription for $5 a month to get just 3 network stations. We got to see two professional football games each week, the NFL on Sunday mornings the AFL on Sunday afternoons. There was no MNF, SNF, or TNF. It was a 12-game season for both the NFL and the AFL, so that's 24 regular season games we got for free. Each league had 2 playoff games and in 1967, they added the Super Bowl. That's 5 playoff games. Add it all together and that's 29 games we got for free if we ignore the cost of the cable subscription.

There are still at least three and most of the time 4 NFL games on network TV that you can get for free if you have decent OTA reception. We have a 17-game season, including the byes makes it 18 weeks of football. That's well over 60 games, over twice the number of free games we got when I was a kid, and that's just in the regular season before we start counting playoff games and ignoring the $5 cable subscription, about $50 in today's money.

I can piss and moan about a lot of changes that has happened over the course of my 70 laps around the sun, but the entertainment value we're getting out of televised football isn't one of them.
At the peak of OTA, I could watch Thursday Night Football, choose between two Sunday early games, have at least one Sunday late game, watch Sunday Night Football, and watch Monday Night Football.

That’s 5-6 games per week plus any Thanksgiving and Christmas broadcasts.

I think that’s what people are comparing to.

I think that ultimately we will be in a better place, but the evolution from that much OTA to fully streaming is not going to be a seamless process.
 

NoGain

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 28, 2022
Messages
3,167
Reaction score
3,309
At the peak of OTA, I could watch Thursday Night Football, choose between two Sunday early games, have at least one Sunday late game, watch Sunday Night Football, and watch Monday Night Football.

That’s 5-6 games per week plus any Thanksgiving and Christmas broadcasts.

I think that’s what people are comparing to.

I think that ultimately we will be in a better place, but the evolution from that much OTA to fully streaming is not going to be a seamless process.
Exactly. Just like you said, I got at least three games on Sunday, the two Thanksgiving Day games, the late season Saturday games, any other holiday game, eventually Monday Night Football, and all the playoff games for free on regular TV for much of my youth and young adulthood. That included any pregame or post game broadcasts. Hell, I could make the argument that the announcers were even better, as they weren't spread so thin.

Personally speaking, it was cheaper back then (free), the quality of the broadcasts were just fine by me, and I didn't feel that I was missing out on anything. I got my football fill. Again, for me personally, the ONLY thing that's really gotten better for me when it come to being an NFL football from my couch is the quality of the TV sets themselves. The picture quality is that much better. Everything else... only very marginally better on the periphery about things I don't care that much about, and a lot more expensive than free. More confusing as well.
 

Trackhawk

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
25
Reaction score
25
I should point out that I believe that, as the move to streaming matures, the confusing part of figuring out which service, and what capabilities that service offers, will be largely fixed. It would be in the best interest of all to make things as clear as possible. A portal page on NFL.com would be ideal.
 

BirdsCommaAngry

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 13, 2013
Messages
1,423
Reaction score
313
Somehow this is going to result in more gambling ads. Gambling is awful for sports and no one should do it. I would bet all kinds of money on gambling being awful for sports.
 

Ostatehawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 16, 2011
Messages
1,160
Reaction score
1,427
Somehow this is going to result in more gambling ads. Gambling is awful for sports and no one should do it. I would bet all kinds of money on gambling being awful for sports.
I'll take that bet.

Even lay the points.
 
Top