Geno gets paid today ....

warden

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 6, 2010
Messages
3,049
Reaction score
1,438
I applaud McDonald for playing the players and giving them a chance to get their incentives. Trust is earned and this move by McDonald has gone fully noticed by the players. This move also helps in negotiations of further contracts when the team wants to make the contract more incentive based, the player has some belief that the coach is not going to screw them over at the end of the season and prevent them from having the opportunity to reach their incentives. This is not Madden but the real world. This stuff matters a lot
 

sutz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 1, 2007
Messages
30,705
Reaction score
7,248
Location
Kent, WA
Keep in mind that the money isn't due today. It only gets paid if he is still on the roster in March along with next year's roster bonus. The team could still dick him out of it for you bloodthirsty types.
 

SeaWolv

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 26, 2012
Messages
1,814
Reaction score
1,157
Geno just played his normal game, IMO. Grubb called a better game. Geno played through the pain of an injury, led a late-game Game-Winning drive, and this time the D did their part and stopped the Rams short of a TD. Pay the man his bonus!
And most importantly he didn't throw any picks.
 

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
6,168
Reaction score
2,276
Keep in mind that the money isn't due today. It only gets paid if he is still on the roster in March along with next year's roster bonus. The team could still dick him out of it for you bloodthirsty types.
That would be counter to how this front office under Schneider has historically operated. But, with Carroll gone, who knows? Still, I think they go out of their way to be fair to Geno. Other, future Seahawk QBs and Free Agents are watching.
 
Last edited:

olyfan63

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 17, 2012
Messages
6,168
Reaction score
2,276
Do we win this game 6 out of ten times? Or were we just lucky. Hard to build on that. Once again our pass defense was poor
A win is a win. ALL Road Wins in the NFL are A GOOD WIN. A win over a 12 win team is better than a win over a 4 win team. A healthy Jimmy G is a legit NFL QB. He looked healthy and sharp. Any special reason to care about a hypothetical win 6 times out of 10? Next year the rosters will be different, new Seahawks OC, etc.

Let's celebrate that Geno got it done, and celebrate, at least on a personal basis for him, that he got his 4M worth of bonuses, independent of what happens at the Seahawk QB position next season.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,404
Here's a good question that I asked my son yesterday during the game...

Isn't Geno's Completion % Incentive of $2M... doesn't it lead to Geno taking more sacks than necessary (I believe he does)?... because if he chucks the ball out of bounds instead of taking a sack, the pass goes down as an incompletion, thereby lowering his completion % for the season.

Another way of thinking about it... that incentive leads to him making plays (taking sacks) that hurt the team... at the expense of him earning $2M as an individual.
 

Utah_hawk

Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2012
Messages
32
Reaction score
8
Here's a good question that I asked my son yesterday during the game...

Isn't Geno's Completion % Incentive of $2M... doesn't it lead to Geno taking more sacks than necessary (I believe he does)?... because if he chucks the ball out of bounds instead of taking a sack, the pass goes down as an incompletion, thereby lowering his completion % for the season.

Another way of thinking about it... that incentive leads to him making plays (taking sacks) that hurt the team... at the expense of him earning $2M as an individual.
Yup. It also incentivizes him to not take risky throws down field to push the ball. Geno isn't accurate when it counts (red zone).

His total yard incentive also leads to him audibling out of run plays.

I want to understand why Schneider would structure the contract this way. Most QBs have incentives based on wins, # of starts, etc. it seems very foolish
 

Fernie Hawks Fan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 16, 2013
Messages
430
Reaction score
375
Location
Fernie, B.C. Canada
Yup. It also incentivizes him to not take risky throws down field to push the ball. Geno isn't accurate when it counts (red zone).

His total yard incentive also leads to him audibling out of run plays.

I want to understand why Schneider would structure the contract this way. Most QBs have incentives based on wins, # of starts, etc. it seems very foolish
I have had these same concerns. I do like the 10 win incentive, but the others seem to have an opportunity to be a little team negative, at least to me.
 

Rat

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
11,376
Reaction score
6,519
Location
Grand Rapids, MI
He also had a $2 million incentive for 30 TDs. That probably seemed attainable at the beginning of the season.
 
Last edited:

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,608
Reaction score
2,843
"I guess yeah" is one hell of a way to put it.


We also have to remember one thing here; Mike MacDonald has little say over the personel. Carroll was president of football operations here, a position usually reserved for GMs. Mike MacDonald is your regular joe HC. He doesn't have any control over who Schneider signs, brings in, cuts, etc.

Mike MacDonald is just responding honestly, he doesn't really know what is going to happen to Geno, or what Schneider has planned. They'll probably convene now that the season is over, but all Mike MacDonald has is an opinion, he has no control in what Schneider does or doesn't do and conversely who ends up on the roster. He can tell Schneider what he thinks -- but unlike Carroll, Schneider can choose to ignore MacDonald.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,991
Reaction score
16,984
Location
Sammamish, WA
Do we honestly know this, or is it an assumption? Not trying to argue, but he may have a little more input than you think. I can't imagine Coach Mike just has zero say in who comes here. Coaches need to get the players that want too, not just who the GM adds to the team. None of us actually know how much input Mike has in personnel. He doesn't strike me at all as some yes man coach. He wants things a certain way, and you can see that. The two LB's that got sent packing, I highly doubt that was JUST a Schneider decision. And bringing in Jones, I suspect that was very much something that Mike wanted for this team. Those two LB's weren't producing the way Mike wanted, he sent them packing, not just John.
And what would be the benefit of JS just ignoring what Mike wants? That makes no sense. He's the one who chose to bring Mike here, I highly doubt it was a situation where he told him "I make all the personnel decisions, you coach"

Not an attempt at arguing, just talking football.
 
Last edited:

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,608
Reaction score
2,843
Do we honestly know this, or is it an assumption? Not trying to argue, but he may have a little more input than you think. I can't imagine Coach Mike just has zero say in who comes here. Coaches need to get the players that want too, not just who the GM adds to the team. None of us actually know how much input Mike has in personnel.
I can't comment on their working relationship. Who knows how close Schneider and MacDonald are. What I do know, is when we look at the power hierarchy -- MacDonald has no say on things. MacDonald can bench people, but he cannot cut, nor can he trade, nor can he be the person to pull the trigger on draft day. Schneider is the only person with real power when it comes to player acquisition.

I say this because contentious relationships with the HC and GM are not uncommon. We've seen one of them play out here between Ruskell and Holmgren. Really, Ruskell did Holmgren dirty and actively sabotaged him and there wasn't anything Holmgren could do about it. If the two have disagreements, MacDonald can't do a darn thing.

I do know a few things though. Knight was a player that MacDonald personally advocated for and Schneider went out and drafted him. They do have some kind of working relationship. If they have a hang up on certain players like Geno, Schneider can do whatever he pleases. He can go over MacDonalds head.

It is also likely that they haven't even discussed Geno's future during the regular season. Unlike Carroll, MacDonald doesn't have to bother with contracts, contract structuring, contract disputes, salary cap, none of that. He probably was just focused on the game ahead of him. I've doubt he's even looked at the possibility of Geno leaving at this point, since the season just ended.

One last thing to consider is the OC just was fired. MacDonald is a defensive specialist that deferred to OC on offense. MacDonald looked very uninvolved on that side of the ball, he was deferring to his hired help/offensive specialist. It was really the Grubb show on offense. My guess is he's going to do the same thing here; defer to whomever his new OC ends up being and Jon Schneider.
 

oldhawkfan

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 3, 2011
Messages
4,769
Reaction score
2,468
Location
Spokane
Keep in mind that the money isn't due today. It only gets paid if he is still on the roster in March along with next year's roster bonus. The team could still dick him out of it for you bloodthirsty types.
This makes no sense. He only gets the $6mil in bonuses earned from the 2024 season if he’s still on the roster n March? These were incentives earned from this season. That’s like saying in any regular job that you will get an end of year bonus if you hit your incentives but only if you’re still employed during the next year. Performance bonuses are earned paydays based on how well you did your job. So in essence, you earned your bonus but if we don’t want to pay it, we fire you?! Try again or provide a link.
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
35,991
Reaction score
16,984
Location
Sammamish, WA
I can't comment on their working relationship. Who knows how close Schneider and MacDonald are. What I do know, is when we look at the power hierarchy -- MacDonald has no say on things. MacDonald can bench people, but he cannot cut, nor can he trade, nor can he be the person to pull the trigger on draft day. Schneider is the only person with real power when it comes to player acquisition.

I say this because contentious relationships with the HC and GM are not uncommon. We've seen one of them play out here between Ruskell and Holmgren. Really, Ruskell did Holmgren dirty and actively sabotaged him and there wasn't anything Holmgren could do about it. If the two have disagreements, MacDonald can't do a darn thing.

I do know a few things though. Knight was a player that MacDonald personally advocated for and Schneider went out and drafted him. They do have some kind of working relationship. If they have a hang up on certain players like Geno, Schneider can do whatever he pleases. He can go over MacDonalds head.

It is also likely that they haven't even discussed Geno's future during the regular season. Unlike Carroll, MacDonald doesn't have to bother with contracts, contract structuring, contract disputes, salary cap, none of that. He probably was just focused on the game ahead of him. I've doubt he's even looked at the possibility of Geno leaving at this point, since the season just ended.

One last thing to consider is the OC just was fired. MacDonald is a defensive specialist that deferred to OC on offense. MacDonald looked very uninvolved on that side of the ball, he was deferring to his hired help/offensive specialist. It was really the Grubb show on offense. My guess is he's going to do the same thing here; defer to whomever his new OC ends up being and Jon Schneider.
Fair enough. I just think he has more say than you think he does, and that's cool. JS seems pretty hands on with his coach, why would he just stop being the way he always has been?
 

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,608
Reaction score
2,843
Fair enough. I just think he has more say than you think he does, and that's cool. JS seems pretty hands on with his coach, why would he just stop being the way he always has been?
Oh they're for sure working together in some capacity, you have no argument from me there. I even gave an example of Knight being drafted because MacDonald really wanted him.

As far as QB goes, that one is difficult. Both their jobs will hedge on what is done with that position. Even with the harmonious relationship that Carroll and Schneider had, Carroll pulled the veto card multiple times and shot down some of Schneiders ideas. If Schneider has a strong idea of what direction he wants the QB position to go, MacDonald can't do much about it.

If MacDonald and Schneider have a disagreement about the QB position it wouldn't be the first time. It's quite common for HC's to get stuck with a guy they never really wanted because the GM or owner decided otherwise.
 

onanygivensunday

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 14, 2010
Messages
6,285
Reaction score
2,404
I agree that Geno will be paid the $6M he earned in incentives regardless of whether or not he's on the roster next year.

I'll just add that it's my understanding that the $6M will count against the team's 2025 cap space because the incentives were classified as 'not likely to be earned'... again, regardless of whether or not Geno is on the 2025 roster.

And we'll know a lot more about Geno's future come March 18th, when his 2025 $16M roster bonus comes due if he's still on the team.
 

Mistashoesta

Well-known member
Joined
Feb 23, 2012
Messages
3,228
Reaction score
2,239
I can't comment on their working relationship. Who knows how close Schneider and MacDonald are. What I do know, is when we look at the power hierarchy -- MacDonald has no say on things. MacDonald can bench people, but he cannot cut, nor can he trade, nor can he be the person to pull the trigger on draft day. Schneider is the only person with real power when it comes to player acquisition.

So you're saying it was John's call to cut our entire LB core mid season? Would he (John) be the one to make that evaluation and recommendation? Or would that come on behalf of the head coach and his staff? If it came at the recommendation of the head coach, I'd say he has a little more influence than "no say". In turn, he could make the same recommendation to John to move on from Geno, if that is case.
 

nanomoz

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 3, 2007
Messages
7,835
Reaction score
1,792
Location
UT
These incentives are "Not Likely to be Earned" incentives, right?

Which means they'll count against next year's already-snug cap.
 

Latest posts

Top