Geno wouldn't do this crap if....

Shane Falco

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,331
Reaction score
1,442
It's like he's becomes a different player in the red zone. Don't understand it.
 
OP
OP
dbsn2420

dbsn2420

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 14, 2009
Messages
1,337
Reaction score
222
Location
Bremerton
WAT?

Are you saying "if Geno didn't have to throw in the Redzone he wouldn't be able to throw interceptions."? Cuz that's the only way your declaration works...and it's still not exactly a ringing endorsement of Geno.
Obviously Geno is steaming Dog Shiit throwing the ball in the red zone, but what other option is there? That's what I'm saying, if this team could at least pose an average threat of the run, Geno would not have to throw as much in tight spaces.
 

SonicHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 22, 2012
Messages
12,803
Reaction score
4,817
I don't think Geno becomes a different QB in the redzone, I genuinely believe that Grubb sucks at playcalling and the redzone just highlights it.

Geno is good enough to not have something like a 20% completion rate in the RZ. Where was the spacing on the INT? Just shit play after shit play.

Also, if Geno is that bad -- holy **** make it easier for him and design some short passes he can make. No matter how good or bad Geno is, Grubb isn't ******* helping.
 

hawker84

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 10, 2012
Messages
5,909
Reaction score
637
Location
Tri Cities, WA
I don't think Geno becomes a different QB in the redzone, I genuinely believe that Grubb sucks at playcalling and the redzone just highlights it.

Geno is good enough to not have something like a 20% completion rate in the RZ. Where was the spacing on the INT? Just shit play after shit play.

Also, if Geno is that bad -- holy **** make it easier for him and design some short passes he can make. No matter how good or bad Geno is, Grubb isn't ******* helping.
Don't waste your time. There's clearly far more educated folks on this site when it comes to offensive football. They clearly know better than two different coaching staffs that thought Geno was/is the best chance at QB for this team to win. These are the same folks screaming for the seahawks to bring in Minshew last summer. Nuff said. 🙄
 

Natethegreat

Well-known member
Joined
May 7, 2012
Messages
3,197
Reaction score
1,355
Don't waste your time. There's clearly far more educated folks on this site when it comes to offensive football. They clearly know better than two different coaching staffs that thought Geno was/is the best chance at QB for this team to win. These are the same folks screaming for the seahawks to bring in Minshew last summer. Nuff said. 🙄
Nobody was screaming for Minshew.
 

Spin Doctor

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 8, 2009
Messages
5,608
Reaction score
2,842
I don't think Geno becomes a different QB in the redzone, I genuinely believe that Grubb sucks at playcalling and the redzone just highlights it.

Geno is good enough to not have something like a 20% completion rate in the RZ. Where was the spacing on the INT? Just shit play after shit play.

Also, if Geno is that bad -- holy **** make it easier for him and design some short passes he can make. No matter how good or bad Geno is, Grubb isn't ******* helping.

Geno’s redzone stats were also poor underneath Waldron. Aside from the first half a year of him starting, his redzone stats have been poor.

I don’t think this is a Grubb issue.
 

Latest posts

Top