Rat
Well-known member
So, we're disrespected because of bias against the west coast that's causing them to not give enough credit to the league's eastern-most team? Also, they overrate the Niners: the media darlings of the east.
'Power' Rankings. Still sleeping on us
- Thread starter keasley45
- Start date
The quarterbacks we've beaten are a beaten Bo Nix and the handcuffed Jacoby Brissett.
Prepare thyself, if we slam Skylar Thompson at home it won't get much better.
Until if/when we can beat the Lions on the road, it's going to look about like this.
Prepare thyself, if we slam Skylar Thompson at home it won't get much better.
Until if/when we can beat the Lions on the road, it's going to look about like this.
SeAhAwKeR4life
Well-known member
NFL.com's current ratings are weird af. They have the 1-1 49ers at #2, the 1-1 Lions at #5 and the 0-2 Ravens at #9
The 2-0 Buccaneers at #12 and us at 2-0 way down at 19. Almost no sense to it, just popularity.
The 2-0 Buccaneers at #12 and us at 2-0 way down at 19. Almost no sense to it, just popularity.
SoulfishHawk
Well-known member
I love laughing at the "You guys won but" posts.
Yeah, winning is a such bummer. Or "They were only playing x team"
So? You can only play and beat who is in front of you.
Yeah, winning is a such bummer. Or "They were only playing x team"
So? You can only play and beat who is in front of you.
Fernie Hawks Fan
Well-known member
Can't stand that A-hole...but I'd like some of what ever he's smokin'.Prisco has us at #7 so there's that I guess.
NFL Week 3 Power Rankings: Major shakeup in top 10 as unexpected 2-0 teams have plenty of reason for optimism
Pete Prisco shares his Power Rankings after Week 3 of the 2024 NFL seasonwww.cbssports.com
Records through two games are largely a function of schedule. There needs to be a bigger sample size to justify any significant movement up and down the power rankings.
Ad Hawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 6, 2011
- Messages
- 3,326
- Reaction score
- 567
And a bias from the previous year, with roster changes accounted for (with the obvious assumptions and question marks), I'd assume.
Just ask Tom Brady how sad he must feel looking at all of those rings thanks to the shit teams he beat up on year after year. That Cupcake Division he was fortunate to take advantage of does not make those Lombardi's and rings shine any less, I promise you.
James in PA
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 4, 2013
- Messages
- 6,636
- Reaction score
- 7,648
Cowherd is showing us some love.
TheLegendOfBoom
Well-known member
You can only play the teams you have been scheduled to play and you still have to win.
Oh, look at that, two wins are two wins!
Undefeated is still undefeated!
I’ll take it!
All other people that bag on the Seahawks about being undefeated—their teams didn’t handle their business. Seattle did.
2-0 and first place in the NFC West!
I’ll take it 10/10 times!
Oh, look at that, two wins are two wins!
Undefeated is still undefeated!
I’ll take it!
All other people that bag on the Seahawks about being undefeated—their teams didn’t handle their business. Seattle did.
2-0 and first place in the NFC West!
I’ll take it 10/10 times!
hawks85
Well-known member
I don't give a damn what the media has us ranked. Put us at 32 and I still don't care.
Not to mention the Darnold lead Vikings at #6. Then again, his list does feel like a perfect week-two overreaction ranking.
bmorepunk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2011
- Messages
- 3,003
- Reaction score
- 211
Two weeks have been played. We know very little about any team, even the Seahawks. Things start to become more clear like the last third of the season.
These types of rankings are supposed to be for fun. If you're getting actually worked up about it, you should evaluate your priorities.
These types of rankings are supposed to be for fun. If you're getting actually worked up about it, you should evaluate your priorities.
hawks85
Well-known member
I just checked out the rankings on NFL.com. I don't care. They can think the Falcons, Saints, the 0-2 Bengals, Raiders, Ravens, Rams etc...are a better team. This is proof that the Mouth Breathing NFL media HATES the PNW and that Macdonald is our HC. All of us on here who have been life long Seahawk fans know the drill. We always been hated on so it's nothing new. The NFL media can kiss my white ass.
Way too much ranking based on the last year's result. Ludicrous in a league where so much changes in the off season.
KC is not number one this season. NO is by far the team that is playing the best right now. Followed by TB. Followed by the Vikes. Of course things can change quickly, but you should rank based on this season not based on some predetermined ideas based on last season.
KC is not number one this season. NO is by far the team that is playing the best right now. Followed by TB. Followed by the Vikes. Of course things can change quickly, but you should rank based on this season not based on some predetermined ideas based on last season.
Hawkinaz
Well-known member
Completely agree with needing a quality win to get recognition
Kamcussionator
Well-known member
The Chargers and Saints have the biggest point differentials in the league so far. Decent power indicator…
SeAhAwKeR4life
Well-known member
His make some semblance of sense compared to NFL.com. At least he gives the 2-0 teams their respect. Everyone is ranking the Ravens too high, 0-2 is 0-2. There's no real evidence they still deserve a high ranking. Lost too many players, lost coaching. It's nuts having them above 15 at best.
Rat
Well-known member
So is playing the Panthers. Guess which two teams have done that?
Similar threads
