DarkVictory23
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2021
- Messages
- 2,012
- Reaction score
- 2,993
It's a bit of always seeing what you want to see, isn't it?I am not going to apologize for this, but some of you play Ahab to Carroll being Moby Dick. For years posters here were banging the drum that Pete only wants to run run pass. Now we barely run the ball and Carroll is limiting Waldron even though he said repeatedly in press conferences and his radio show that we need to run more. Thar she blows!
The problems we had with Shane's offense don't need some conspiracy theory about what Pete did to him to explain: Our offensive line was flat bad this year and last year it wasn't good about creating running lanes. Shocker.
Pete wanting us to be able to run the ball effectively isn't some weird thing that 'handcuffs' an OC. You can probably count on one hand the number of head coaches who are ok with an offense being entirely passing oriented and I'm guessing all of those guys are in college.
There were multiple games this year where having any sort of reliable rushing attack would have changed our fortunes and we didn't have that.
I don't think Waldron was terrible at all (we were a good offense last year and a better-than-should-be-expected given our line play offense this year), but if he had been able to come up with SOMETHING that we could reliably use to rush, that with would have probably saved his (and Pete's) job. He was incapable of out-scheming our deficiencies at the LOS.
Is it reasonable to expect a guy to be able to gameplan for an OL that was put together on the fly, down multiple starters at virtually every point of the season? I don't know the answer to that but I'm also not in charge of hiring decisions for any professional football teams...