nwHawk
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,327
- Reaction score
- 1,658
I have to believe this is about getting intel on the Rams. Rip isn’t exactly future material.
It make sense to me. They're taking a risk having no 3rd QB on the roster. They obviously didn't believe Holton Ahlers was ready for the NFL. Rypien isn't much, but he's played NFL games and if they needed a backup if Geno misses a few games, there aren't many decent choices out there.such an odd random signing.
Conceptual Execution? I'd settle for ACTUAL Execution. The kind that occurs on the field.Rams? Intelligence? LOLOLOLOL .....Sorry, that's just some funny thsi'
Besides LOL they likely got all the intelligence on the Rams when they hired Shane Waldron.
It now comes down to Conceptual Execution.
Regardless, we get to read pages of chicken little garbage yet again.Rypien was the only guy Lock definitely beat out for a job in Denver. Rypien made Lock look good.
This signing is more likely about forcing the Rams to change their verbiage again.
The back-up QB is always an attractive option...until he actually plays. Sometimes it works out, but most times it doesn't. Smith surprised me, (and almost everyone else), last year. Lock might surprise me in the future, as might Rypien, Ahlers, Mannion, Eason, Etling, McGough...Regardless, we get to read pages of chicken little garbage yet again.
The mental fortitude of this fan base is equivalent to ramen noodle broth.
Is he going to tell us how to block the rams DL? If not, what intell will he provide that will actually help?I have to believe this is about getting intel on the Rams. Rip isn’t exactly future material.
LOLOL My "Muscle Memory" has Alzheimer's.The posts here by folks thinking he was signed to actually be considered for field action are pretty hilarious.
He no doubt was brought in to force the Rams to switch up calls and provide whatever insight he might have into their current scheme.
I'd also wager he's not a bad add to a qb room where the OCs seat is starting to get hot. He could be of help in working with our guys on the execution of plays and concepts. Sure, he's a backup and hardly viable as that, but that doesn't mean he doesn't have the brain to understand the scheme. Some guys are just that way - they can teach it, but can't do it. In the same way that often great players can play the game, but not teach it.
2 different muscles...
Coming off a game where the Ravens scheme totally confused and stymied the offense, how hard is it to believe. Players and teams look for advantages all the time.Is he going to tell us how to block the rams DL? If not, what intell will he provide that will actually help?
Mine too. My nephew is good friends with Rypien.My kids went to CV.
The rams D has kicked our ass for years. Maybe he helps, but that’s why we lose to them. Not because they have some crazy explosive O.Coming off a game where the Ravens scheme totally confused and stymied the offense, how hard is it to believe. Players and teams look for advantages all the time.
Do you really believe they signed Brett for any other reason?
Injury to Lock... Which could explain why Lock got no playing time in Baltimore when the game was out of hand. When Ravens put in Huntley, their backup, and Hawks trotted out Geno again.Another unthought of reason is recently Lock was on the injury report with a leg issue and perhaps that is being treated slowly.
I agree with Hawkstorian as to his use and the view that the team is picking his brain on the Rams scheme and verbiage. Winning that Rams game could put the team in a situation where all they need is a split with the Digits to win the division in terms of Divisional record at least.
And yet I managed to stay injury free while also not stepping on the field for a single snap.Another unthought of reason is recently Lock was on the injury report with a leg issue and perhaps that is being treated slowly.