There are moments when, even when the team wins, clear chinks in the armor show.
The offense not producing is still a huge issue, the defense has been called upon to save game after game and the offense, with a wide array of top tier weapons - barely produces.
Now the question is, should we expect anything from this offense when we consider just how gutted a key element of ANY successful offense is? It is not reasonable to expect production when the OL, a key impediment to the defense, is so substandard.
The question is whether smart offensive playcalling can overcome this egregiously bad FO decisioning? I get you cannot pay everyone, but you have to pay at least a reasonable amount for a reasonably effective OL. Trying to game your way around that ends in injured offensive players (check) and offensive failures (check).
So pointing that out even when we win, is shouldn't be unreasonable. We have all watched other teams that had a lot of the pieces but were just permanently behind the 8 ball because of a poor offensive line (usually because of injuries, I have never before seen a team do this to itself ON PURPOSE...but apparently we did).
That said, win and losses seem to have a common thread of some real head scratchingly inconsistent offensive executon or gameplanning. That is on the OC but even a good OC would struggle with these pieces. I just firmly believe that our current OC would squander away wins with much more pieces anyway.
I think the 'going ballistic' after a win is more a symptom of people realizing that even when we win in spite of the problems, those problems are going to be glaring issues we will later likely re-encounter on our run toward or through the playoffs.
But I thought we would be a just above .500 team with those issues and somehow we managed to claw our way near the top in spite of all the problems on offense. Maybe we can still do it, but things do have a tendency to revert back to the mean over time.