chevelle03
New member
I have been rewatching the season and I had forgotten just how unbelievably good this guy was in his rookie year! That is all.
Thomas Rawls
- Thread starter chevelle03
- Start date
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2015
- Messages
- 6,318
- Reaction score
- 4,743
chevelle03":16mdczb7 said:
During a time our oline still wasn't looking so hot or "gelling" either
Natethegreat
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 7, 2012
- Messages
- 2,566
- Reaction score
- 392
Losing him took the wind out of my sails. I would be so so much more confident with him out there. Not that C-Mike hasn't done an admirable job.
SPIRITOF12
Active member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2014
- Messages
- 558
- Reaction score
- 29
No matter what happens this Sunday against Carolina, I am already pumped for next season. If Lynch returns what a helluva backup Rawls will be. If Lynch does not, then the Rawls/Michael Team is exciting in itself.
RussB
New member
Oh man he was awesome. Absolute baller.
Wartooth
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 1,333
- Reaction score
- 28
I was just glad his wasn't a more serious injury.
He should be good to go next year!
He has those instincts you can't coach, and isn't afraid to be physical.
Another undrafted free agent gem.
He should be good to go next year!
He has those instincts you can't coach, and isn't afraid to be physical.
Another undrafted free agent gem.
JAGHAWK
New member
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2015
- Messages
- 629
- Reaction score
- 0
I miss him. 
bjornanderson21
New member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 885
- Reaction score
- 0
No chance of Lynch coming back. Like literally zero.SPIRITOF12":pxvvngfr said:
Age + cap hit + injuries + Rawls = 0% chance Lynch returns.
It's Rawls' job to lose next year.
nIdahoSeahawk
Member
His new contract goes into effect next season because they didn't tear this year up when he was resigned, right? I don't think we can void the contract, and since we haven't even entered year one of the deal, we would be on the hook for the entire signing bonus, which I believe was a significant number, so we're better off keeping lynch. I'm not a cap expert, so I very well could be wrong, but that's how it sounds to mebjornanderson21":sdi5g3b1 said:
kearly
New member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2007
- Messages
- 15,975
- Reaction score
- 0
When Rawls was in there after the post-bye shift to a spread offense, it felt like Seattle couldn't lose a game.
If he stays healthy next year, look out.
If he stays healthy next year, look out.
HawkerD
Active member
nIdahoSeahawk":2rinrxp3 said:
According to Over the Cap we save $6M of 2016 cap by cutting him prior to June 1st and have $2.5M in dead money in both 16 and 17
Seymour
Active member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2015
- Messages
- 7,459
- Reaction score
- 22
SPIRITOF12":2jnnn9ut said:
Did you watch the 2 run behind the same Oline this year?
If so, then you must mean you'd love to see Lynch backup Rawls, because that is the only scenario that makes sense for the team (ignoring Lynch's $12M of course).
