Seahawks Favored by 14 Over Browns

bmorepunk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 2, 2011
Messages
2,990
Reaction score
201
There's a 100% chance I will greatly enjoy watching Johnny Manziel get his ass beat. Please make my dreams come true, Seahawks defense.
 

ringless

New member
Joined
Jul 16, 2014
Messages
1,978
Reaction score
0
bmorepunk":6scbxlkz said:
There's a 100% chance I will greatly enjoy watching Johnny Manziel get his ass beat. Please make my dreams come true, Seahawks defense.

This is the one positive I will enjoy next week.
 

Rob12

New member
Joined
Aug 22, 2013
Messages
2,688
Reaction score
0
Location
Dayton, WA
hawknation2015":1u8k7j1r said:
Elo projections give the Seahawks a 91% chance at victory.

Not trying to sound arrogant at all, but that seems low.
 

brimsalabim

Active member
Joined
Aug 12, 2012
Messages
4,509
Reaction score
3
Browns won yesterday mostly behind a strong running game.
 

UK_Seahawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 24, 2013
Messages
4,469
Reaction score
513
Manziel knows how to find his decentish Tight End.....
 

Polaris

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
0
Browns/Manziel at Seattle for his very first time.

HIDE THE WOMEN AND CHILDREN!
 

Hawk-Lock

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
5,313
Reaction score
565
Some books now have 14.5. Huge difference between 14 and 14.5.

2 TD's is about as big as a spread gets in the NFL. I'll put it this way, Carolina was only -8 yesterday against the lowly Falcons. So that shows just how much respect Vegas has for the 8-5 Seahawks.

And Hawks are -1250 on the ML. Anyone laying $1250 to win 100 lol?
 

JaiSeaSea

New member
Joined
May 17, 2013
Messages
538
Reaction score
0
seahawksny":t2dxvwta said:
If we are up two TDs at half- put T-Jax in
You can tell on film Russell hates coming out of the game. I saw it yesterday when he was talking to Carroll.
 

chawx

Active member
Joined
May 6, 2009
Messages
1,343
Reaction score
18
Location
Salt Lake City, UT
Hawk-Lock":3j6rfcxd said:
Some books now have 14.5. Huge difference between 14 and 14.5.

2 TD's is about as big as a spread gets in the NFL. I'll put it this way, Carolina was only -8 yesterday against the lowly Falcons. So that shows just how much respect Vegas has for the 8-5 Seahawks.

And Hawks are -1250 on the ML. Anyone laying $1250 to win 100 lol?

I'd put $1.25 billion of Paul Allen's money to win $100 million.
 

HomerJHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
1,870
Reaction score
248
Location
Vancouver, WA
You know how we are franchise crushers, and can blow teams up? Well, this is on the horizon again.
Browns are gonna get leveled, Manziel will have 3 picks, he's gonna get upset and go out partying.
The Browns will ship him out next year and they'll have to start all over again.

I feel bad for the Browns. I have nothing against them.
 

Polaris

Active member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
2,206
Reaction score
0
Hawk-Lock":3ax4khoy said:
Some books now have 14.5. Huge difference between 14 and 14.5.

2 TD's is about as big as a spread gets in the NFL. I'll put it this way, Carolina was only -8 yesterday against the lowly Falcons. So that shows just how much respect Vegas has for the 8-5 Seahawks.

And Hawks are -1250 on the ML. Anyone laying $1250 to win 100 lol?

Geez. 14.5 on an NFL game? That's virtually unheard of in Vegas. The next step is to take the game off the books entirely (I heard that the Atlantic City books took Seattle/Baltimore off the books when they found out Clausen was starting) and call it a 'mismatch'. What's darkly amusing is I still think that line may be too low......

Like I said above: Hide the women and children. This isn't going to be pretty.
 

Ramfan128

Active member
Joined
Jan 13, 2014
Messages
1,170
Reaction score
13
14 is too low.

During the Hawks super bowl year they were favored by 17 over the Jags.

Hawks offense is better now than it was then and the Browns are about the same as the Jags.

Hawks by 21 would be more accurate IMO.
 

Hawk-Lock

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 12, 2014
Messages
5,313
Reaction score
565
Ramfan128":3ig1c4pq said:
14 is too low.

During the Hawks super bowl year they were favored by 17 over the Jags.

Hawks offense is better now than it was then and the Browns are about the same as the Jags.

Hawks by 21 would be more accurate IMO.

I believe that spread against the Jags a couple of years ago got as high as -19.
 

Latest posts

Top