Crazy how people view Kam. I love the guy and great player but he was probably the 4th best player on that defense, not of all time but specifically that defense.
I have a guy on the Bears forum saying Largent was too slow (4.7 in 40) to play in today’s NFL, would be covered by a linebacker,etc. DJ Moore is Usain Bolt compared to him, blah, blah. Total disrespect.Steve Largent: The greatest wide receiver in the entire history of the N.F.L.
Joe Nash: Solid as a rock, anchoring the defensive line from 1982 - 1996, played in 218 games which is the most of any Seahawk ever.
Shaun Alexander: Most rushing yards in team history, most touchdowns in team history, most points scored by a non-kicker, our only N.F.L. M.V.P., etc. etc. etc. He was actually featured on the front cover of Sports Illustrated.
Matt Hasselbeck: Greatest quarterback in team history, led the Seahawks to our first Super Bowl.
(Wilson is obviously out, and irredeemable, for bailing on the Seahawks and stabbing us all in the back. So, he is dead to me in terms of being a "Seahawk.")
He was one tenth of a second slower than Cooper Kupp, who is the best receiver in the league currently. I doubt your Bears forum buddy knows what he is talking about.I have a guy on the Bears forum saying Largent was too slow (4.7 in 40) to play in today’s NFL, would be covered by a linebacker,etc. DJ Moore is Usain Bolt compared to him, blah, blah. Total disrespect.
My question: Would Largent in 2023 be Pro Bowl, average WR, or too slow to make the roster? If he ran 4.7 at the combine, he might go undrafted.
Largent had terrific hands and caught most everything thrown his way. Drops from Largent were about as rare as a Haley comet sighting. Speed doesn't mean diddly squat if you can't catch the ball. Just ask Renaldo Nehemiah or Devon Allen (more recent track star to play in the NFL).I have a guy on the Bears forum saying Largent was too slow (4.7 in 40) to play in today’s NFL, would be covered by a linebacker,etc. DJ Moore is Usain Bolt compared to him, blah, blah. Total disrespect.
My question: Would Largent in 2023 be Pro Bowl, average WR, or too slow to make the roster? If he ran 4.7 at the combine, he might go undrafted.
I come here to get the views of Seahawks fans who know more about Largent than do Bears fans. I am a longtime Bears/Seahawks fan, and will admit my Largent bias. It all started on the Bears forum when I said JSN reminds me a lot of Largent with his superb route running.Largent had terrific hands and caught most everything thrown his way. Drops from Largent were about as rare as a Haley comet sighting. Speed doesn't mean diddly squat if you can't catch the ball. Just ask Renaldo Nehemiah or Devon Allen (more recent track star to play in the NFL).
I don't like comparing eras. Steve Largent was the best in his era. That is all that matters. Why is a bears fan chiming in on a Seahawk Mt. Rushmore? Who cares what they think anyway. Does a lion concern itself with the opinion of the sheep?
I'm sorry if my post offended you. That was not what I intended. I was referring to the guy you mentioned on the Bears forum who was talking out of his arse regarding Largent. Probably didn't even see him play. If he had, he wouldn't be commenting as he did. Largent showed enough football speed to make great plays offensively and some defensively during his career. Furthermore, Largent was most likely the main reason anyone knew the Seahawks in the late 70s through early 80s. The only piece that consistently got national recognition.I come here to get the views of Seahawks fans who know more about Largent than do Bears fans. I am a longtime Bears/Seahawks fan, and will admit my Largent bias. It all started on the Bears forum when I said JSN reminds me a lot of Largent with his superb route running.
He is hung up on Largent’s 4.7 time in the 40. He says the cornerbacks today would be too fast for him. Being at least .3 seconds faster in 40 allows them to close the gap after separation to catch up and disrupt the pass. That’s his belief.I'm sorry if my post offended you. That was not what I intended. I was referring to the guy you mentioned on the Bears forum who was talking out of his arse regarding Largent. Probably didn't even see him play. If he had, he wouldn't be commenting as he did. Largent showed enough football speed to make great plays offensively and some defensively during his career. Furthermore, Largent was most likely the main reason anyone knew the Seahawks in the late 70s through early 80s. The only piece that consistently got national recognition.
It's a strange thing to be hung up on. Most HOF WRs prior to 2010 would probably fit in that category.He is hung up on Largent’s 4.7 time in the 40. He says the cornerbacks today would be too fast for him. Being at least .3 seconds faster in 40 allows them to close the gap after separation to catch up and disrupt the pass. That’s his belief.