But what about Paul A.?This is the only correct answer.
I had to rethink.
Maybe you want to?
But what about Paul A.?This is the only correct answer.
How can you not have anyone from the team that won the only SB in Hawks history? That makes no sense.
Exactly. The 4 I listed are hall of famers. Russ isn’t and will never be a hall of fame quarterback. That’s like saying Trent Dilfer is a hall of famer lolBecause non of those players were as great as the individuals listed. How does that not make sense to you? It wasnt a question of which team, it was which players.
Exactly. The 4 I listed are hall of famers. Russ isn’t and will never be a hall of fame quarterback. That’s like saying Trent Dilfer is a hall of famer lol
Wagner will be a first ballot HOF. Lynch will get in too but not on first ballot. Sherm will be only LOBer to make it.Russ still has a shot if he can put another couple good seasons together. Its a big "What If" though. Wags, Lynch, and some of the LOB have a chance too. Alexander still may sneak in eventually. Who knows down the line.
Dilfers name should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Russell Wilson. Prior to two years ago Wilson in my opinion was a lock for the Hall of Fame. It’s mind-boggling to me how many people forget what he did on the field for so many years.Exactly. The 4 I listed are hall of famers. Russ isn’t and will never be a hall of fame quarterback. That’s like saying Trent Dilfer is a hall of famer lol
Wagner is first ballot hof bound. Try again.Because non of those players were as great as the individuals listed. How does that not make sense to you? It wasnt a question of which team, it was which players.
Wagner is first ballot hof bound. Try again.
Bobby's resume surpasses every Seahawk to ever play.Because non of those players were as great as the individuals listed. How does that not make sense to you? It wasnt a question of which team, it was which players.
Beat me to it.Largent
Kenny Easley
Cortez Kennedy
Walter Jones
My point is that I don't agree.And he still isnt better than the four players mentioned. Whats your point?
Great topic. But as much as I loved Kam, you can't have a mount Rushmore without #45, IMO.Largent, Tez, Lynch, Chancellor
What say you?
Dilfer knew how to rip it. Did he sustain it as long and well as Russ? No but there’s many similarities when you consider both had a ring leaning on all world defensesDilfers name should never be mentioned in the same sentence as Russell Wilson. Prior to two years ago Wilson in my opinion was a lock for the Hall of Fame. It’s mind-boggling to me how many people forget what he did on the field for so many years.
Great for his time, but it is tough to compare player abilities in a vacuum; which can make these subjective debates both difficult and fun.Admittedly I didn't watch Largent. Definitely a fan fav, but didn't other Seahawk receivers beat his single-season records? (Engram, Doug, Lockett) Someone school me on his greatness. If he was a receiver in today's game, would he be dominating? What made him special?
I swear to God that the following is the truth. I wrote a letter to the Seahawk organization (the only letter I have ever written to them) begging them to draft Kenny Easley. I'm sure I had absolutely no impact on their decision, because they didn't draft Neil Lomax who was also mentioned in that same letter. I did, however, feel elated about them taking Easley. His career was short but sweet. He was widely regarded as the best player at his position for at least a couple of years.Great topic. But as much as I loved Kam, you can't have a mount Rushmore without #45, IMO.
Edited to say : Picture Kam as also a pro-bowl level return man. And in Easley's day, players were a bit smaller than today. So basically it could be argued that he was as big as Kam while effectively returning punts. And he was also every bit as intimating as Kam, too. If you ask Ronnie Lott who the greatest safety ever was...he'll say Kenny Easley. In fairness, Easley says the same about Ronnie Lott. But I side with Lott on this one.