SeahawksBMX
Active member
Because this will likely get bumped somewhere down the road, I'm going for precision.
67/913/11 (regular season)
67/913/11 (regular season)
Scottemojo":1owq6y1r said:600 yards, 8 touchdowns.
This. We have a winner fellas.SonicHawk":38pvw570 said:15,000 yards, 87 touchdowns, 17 sacks.
Ahhhh, he'll catch passes thrown to him.ZagHawk":332q8vph said:0. O-Line was bad to begin with, lose Max and Carp and add in a TE who can't block. What good is he going to be in this system?
onanygivensunday":2dz42mpt said:I'm going with 75 catches, 1000 yards and 10 TDs in the regular season.
All realistic imo.
Last year, Richardson had 29, Harvin 22, Helfet 12, Moeaki 8, and Zach 6, That totals 77 that I could see most all of them going to Graham.
Notice that I didn't take Luke's 22 catches and allocate them to Graham.
And that I don't expect the Hawks to change their Runass ratio by much.
NINEster":27qhpmlb said:onanygivensunday":27qhpmlb said:I'm going with 75 catches, 1000 yards and 10 TDs in the regular season.
All realistic imo.
Last year, Richardson had 29, Harvin 22, Helfet 12, Moeaki 8, and Zach 6, That totals 77 that I could see most all of them going to Graham.
Notice that I didn't take Luke's 22 catches and allocate them to Graham.
And that I don't expect the Hawks to change their Runass ratio by much.
I see that Graham's best year in New Orleans was 99 catches for 1310 yards, 11 TDs in 2011. The year the Saints offense was a ridiculous scoring machine.
To expect 75% of the receptions and yardage from the Seahawk offense is not realistic when you compare the run/pass ratios, supporting cast and QBs. Also the Saints threw the ball so much that having Graham on the field was never a tip off for run/pass like it could be in Seattle where he's a subpar run blocker.
Jimmy Graham fits into the Seahawk offense well in the way that jump balls are both his and Wilson's MO. I'll give you that.
LoneHawkFan":2n2na6f6 said:NINEster":2n2na6f6 said:onanygivensunday":2n2na6f6 said:I'm going with 75 catches, 1000 yards and 10 TDs in the regular season.
All realistic imo.
Last year, Richardson had 29, Harvin 22, Helfet 12, Moeaki 8, and Zach 6, That totals 77 that I could see most all of them going to Graham.
Notice that I didn't take Luke's 22 catches and allocate them to Graham.
And that I don't expect the Hawks to change their Runass ratio by much.
I see that Graham's best year in New Orleans was 99 catches for 1310 yards, 11 TDs in 2011. The year the Saints offense was a ridiculous scoring machine.
To expect 75% of the receptions and yardage from the Seahawk offense is not realistic when you compare the run/pass ratios, supporting cast and QBs. Also the Saints threw the ball so much that having Graham on the field was never a tip off for run/pass like it could be in Seattle where he's a subpar run blocker.
Jimmy Graham fits into the Seahawk offense well in the way that jump balls are both his and Wilson's MO. I'll give you that.
Again though, think about it on a per game basis. 75 catches is just under 5 catches per game. I don't think that's unrealistic, even in this offense:
Think of how many more 3rd down conversions we make, creating more offense, more offensive plays, more passes. How many more scrambles (runs that were called passes) that actually become passes?
I think it's fair to assume Russell has 500+ attempts this year, which is 50 more than 2014. That's 31 attempts per game...at a 63% completion clip (2013, 2014 figure, which is likely to raise this year with Graham) that's ~20 completions, per game. Do you really believe that 75 catches is unrealistic at 5 catches per game?
When looked at holistically- the extended drives, the red-zone playbook, the scramble throws instead of runs, the higher completion % possibilities- I'm not saying its a no-brainer to get to 75...but it sure is realistic to me.
66/912/10SeahawksBMX":1bz00083 said:Because this will likely get bumped somewhere down the road, I'm going for precision.
67/913/11 (regular season)
Wenhawk":39fyhmjj said:66/912/10SeahawksBMX":39fyhmjj said:Because this will likely get bumped somewhere down the road, I'm going for precision.
67/913/11 (regular season)