SeatownJay
Active member
It's the second-best team in the Pac 12 South vs. the second-best team in the Pac 12 North. Who ya got? I'm going with the trees.
hawknation2014":6lhe8mtd said:USC did not win that game . . . Stanford lost that game. All nine of their drives crossed the 30-yard-line but they continually shot themselves in the foot when they approached the red zone. Hogan was erratic as hell. The Pac-12 is god awful this year, except for Oregon.
At least Sarkisian's play calling was exposed.
Kennedyin92":1905x002 said:hawknation2014":1905x002 said:USC did not win that game . . . Stanford lost that game. All nine of their drives crossed the 30-yard-line but they continually shot themselves in the foot when they approached the red zone. Hogan was erratic as hell. The Pac-12 is god awful this year, except for Oregon.
At least Sarkisian's play calling was exposed.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but it did go down as a "W" on USC's schedule, right? Last time I checked that was a win. It wasn't the prettiest victory, but it was a victory.
Largent80":l7fanvog said:Considering how USC was down about 25 players and the majority of the team are freshmen, they look like a good squad and lookout in the upcoming years.
Hasselbeck":uf17v171 said:Largent80":uf17v171 said:Considering how USC was down about 25 players and the majority of the team are freshmen, they look like a good squad and lookout in the upcoming years.
Yep. The old USC loaded recruiting classes will resume very soon. Good thing the likes of Oregon and UCLA took advantage of USC's down period though.
Oh wait.