bjornanderson21
New member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2014
- Messages
- 885
- Reaction score
- 0
Is it just me, or are lots of people taking his words and twisting them?
When he says its business just like with red and the others, why can't people just take him at his word?
Did he say that the hawks were bad for letting "red and the others" go? No.
Did he say they're bad for making business decisions? No.
Go back and read the tweet, but this time do it WITHOUT ADDING YOUR OWN EMOTIONAL SLANT.
Im looking at his words, and it appears to me as though he is just saying that the team is making business decisions and obviously there is a reason he has not signed a contract yet.
I think everyone who interprets his tweet as "im mad because they let some players walk" is reading too far into it and seeing things that aren't there.
It sounds like he just hasn't gotten an offer he likes because the hawks have to be careful with their money, which is why "red and the others" were let go in the first place.
When he says its business just like with red and the others, why can't people just take him at his word?
Did he say that the hawks were bad for letting "red and the others" go? No.
Did he say they're bad for making business decisions? No.
Go back and read the tweet, but this time do it WITHOUT ADDING YOUR OWN EMOTIONAL SLANT.
Im looking at his words, and it appears to me as though he is just saying that the team is making business decisions and obviously there is a reason he has not signed a contract yet.
I think everyone who interprets his tweet as "im mad because they let some players walk" is reading too far into it and seeing things that aren't there.
It sounds like he just hasn't gotten an offer he likes because the hawks have to be careful with their money, which is why "red and the others" were let go in the first place.