Is it still premature to name Wilson the all time starting QB?
Feb 3, 2014 #1 E Erebus Active member Joined Nov 23, 2009 Messages 1,588 Reaction score 5 Location San Antonio, TX Is it still premature to name Wilson the all time starting QB?
Feb 3, 2014 #2 HawkFan72 Active member Joined Mar 3, 2007 Messages 16,570 Reaction score 1 Location Bay Area, CA Not anymore. He doesn't have the stat accumulation yet, but he has accomplished more than anyone else.
Not anymore. He doesn't have the stat accumulation yet, but he has accomplished more than anyone else.
Feb 3, 2014 #3 Steve2222 New member Joined Aug 31, 2012 Messages 1,993 Reaction score 1 Players on this team will litter the All Time team. Go ahead and put Wilson, Lynch, Sherman, and Thomas on it.
Players on this team will litter the All Time team. Go ahead and put Wilson, Lynch, Sherman, and Thomas on it.
Feb 3, 2014 #4 chris98251 Well-known member Joined Feb 27, 2007 Messages 39,680 Reaction score 1,697 Location Roy Wa. Kam is in that talk, my all time favorite is Easley, but I can't disrespect Kam, he has been everything we needed and more.
Kam is in that talk, my all time favorite is Easley, but I can't disrespect Kam, he has been everything we needed and more.
Feb 3, 2014 #5 LargentFan Member Joined Apr 30, 2009 Messages 801 Reaction score 12 It's fun and all to try to think of who would make the all-time roster, but people forget that a roster is 53 players. There's room for Earl, Kam and Easley. Please don't make me the one who has to pick who starts though...
It's fun and all to try to think of who would make the all-time roster, but people forget that a roster is 53 players. There's room for Earl, Kam and Easley. Please don't make me the one who has to pick who starts though...