hawkfan68
Well-known member
If the Seahawks and Darrell Bevell part ways, I think Mike McCoy would be a great OC for the Seahawks. That is if SD fires McCoy and he's not offered a HC job elsewhere.
hawkfan68":2hiy25bs said:If the Seahawks and Darrell Bevell part ways, I think Mike McCoy would be a great OC for the Seahawks. That is if SD fires McCoy and he's not offered a HC job elsewhere.
theENGLISHseahawk":2nq5tdqp said:hawkfan68":2nq5tdqp said:If the Seahawks and Darrell Bevell part ways, I think Mike McCoy would be a great OC for the Seahawks. That is if SD fires McCoy and he's not offered a HC job elsewhere.
Did you see the Chargers last season and in the early part of this season??!?!
hawkfan68":rg9hilgq said:theENGLISHseahawk":rg9hilgq said:hawkfan68":rg9hilgq said:If the Seahawks and Darrell Bevell part ways, I think Mike McCoy would be a great OC for the Seahawks. That is if SD fires McCoy and he's not offered a HC job elsewhere.
Did you see the Chargers last season and in the early part of this season??!?!
The Chargers are averaging 29.4 pts per game on offense. They are also averaging 365 yards per game. They have a scoring efficiency percentage of 47.5 which is the 4th best in the NFL. All of these are better than what the Seahawk offense is doing. So yeah, I'd think that Mike McCoy would be a decent replacement should Bevell and the Seahawks part ways - that could mean he leaves voluntarily or involuntarily.
No matter how we lined up, Jimmy was going to be triple teamed. And the play was inches from working. Also, Bev never blamed Lockett. That would be your interpretation of blame. He simply was answering with the truth.austinslater25":qbdstbqg said:I agree. You have two "A"'s in your passing game in Baldwins quickness and Graham's catch radius and size. You decide to throw a fade to a 5'10 receiver who might be your 4th best option. Brock said it yesterday, Pete even alluded to it being the wrong idea and multiple people see the same thing. I don't think Bevell is horrible but his situational play calling is just weird. I think the pro Bevell camp gets defensive because he really can and does do some great things. What keeps him out of the upper range is that when he misfires he misfires is ridiculous fashion. Slant pass to your special teams gunner? Then blame him for execution? This is the kind of stuff that the best oc's don't miss on. No one calls a perfect game but you can put your strengths and best personnel in the best opportunity to succeed and Bevell just flat out doesn't.
austinslater25":16yqma9q said:I agree. You have two "A"'s in your passing game in Baldwins quickness and Graham's catch radius and size. You decide to throw a fade to a 5'10 receiver who might be your 4th best option. Brock said it yesterday, Pete even alluded to it being the wrong idea and multiple people see the same thing. I don't think Bevell is horrible but his situational play calling is just weird. I think the pro Bevell camp gets defensive because he really can and does do some great things. What keeps him out of the upper range is that when he misfires he misfires is ridiculous fashion. Slant pass to your special teams gunner? Then blame him for execution? This is the kind of stuff that the best oc's don't miss on. No one calls a perfect game but you can put your strengths and best personnel in the best opportunity to succeed and Bevell just flat out doesn't.
Siouxhawk":2nar2b4s said:No matter how we lined up, Jimmy was going to be triple teamed. And the play was inches from working. Also, Bev never blamed Lockett. That would be your interpretation of blame. He simply was answering with the truth.austinslater25":2nar2b4s said:I agree. You have two "A"'s in your passing game in Baldwins quickness and Graham's catch radius and size. You decide to throw a fade to a 5'10 receiver who might be your 4th best option. Brock said it yesterday, Pete even alluded to it being the wrong idea and multiple people see the same thing. I don't think Bevell is horrible but his situational play calling is just weird. I think the pro Bevell camp gets defensive because he really can and does do some great things. What keeps him out of the upper range is that when he misfires he misfires is ridiculous fashion. Slant pass to your special teams gunner? Then blame him for execution? This is the kind of stuff that the best oc's don't miss on. No one calls a perfect game but you can put your strengths and best personnel in the best opportunity to succeed and Bevell just flat out doesn't.
Yes, he was triple bracketed. We have a thread in the other section devoted to that play.austinslater25":33mm3srq said:Siouxhawk":33mm3srq said:No matter how we lined up, Jimmy was going to be triple teamed. And the play was inches from working. Also, Bev never blamed Lockett. That would be your interpretation of blame. He simply was answering with the truth.austinslater25":33mm3srq said:I agree. You have two "A"'s in your passing game in Baldwins quickness and Graham's catch radius and size. You decide to throw a fade to a 5'10 receiver who might be your 4th best option. Brock said it yesterday, Pete even alluded to it being the wrong idea and multiple people see the same thing. I don't think Bevell is horrible but his situational play calling is just weird. I think the pro Bevell camp gets defensive because he really can and does do some great things. What keeps him out of the upper range is that when he misfires he misfires is ridiculous fashion. Slant pass to your special teams gunner? Then blame him for execution? This is the kind of stuff that the best oc's don't miss on. No one calls a perfect game but you can put your strengths and best personnel in the best opportunity to succeed and Bevell just flat out doesn't.
He wasn't triple teamed, did you watch the play? I think you're reading into it what you want to in your quest to always defend Bevell. Brock who played in the NFL was completely baffled by the call and he's right.
In regards to Lockette counting on your 6th receiver aka gunner at a crucial goal line catch was stupid. Flat out stupid. I haven't seen one non Seahawk fan defend the personnel grouping on that play, not one. That is my problem with Bevell. I don't think he is terrible, I just don't think he is never wrong as you and others seem to see it. He's an average OC. If he was much better he would be getting looks from other teams and the more tape he produces the less interested other teams become.
El Caliente":1a5gmmld said:The Saints have had a top 5 offense offense (ypg) every year since Sean Payton arrived in New Orleans, and they have only finished outside of the top 10 in scoring once. I am not sure what qualifies you to be #1 overall, but with results like that, I am dumfounded as to how Hue, Kyle, and Josh are ahead of him.
Hawks46":142tfhdw said:El Caliente":142tfhdw said:The Saints have had a top 5 offense offense (ypg) every year since Sean Payton arrived in New Orleans, and they have only finished outside of the top 10 in scoring once. I am not sure what qualifies you to be #1 overall, but with results like that, I am dumfounded as to how Hue, Kyle, and Josh are ahead of him.
Josh is ahead of him because he can take a backup with almost no real game reps (Garrapalo) and play to his strengths and make him look really good, like Brady's heir. Then he can make a 3rd stringer look passable.
theENGLISHseahawk":3ovolul0 said:How good did the third stringer look in a shut out home loss to the Bills?
And let's be realistic here with Garoppolo. He was a second round pick who has had two and a half years to prepare for his opportunity and to learn behind arguably the greatest QB to ever play the game, with one of the greatest Head Coaches for guidance.
People are talking like he's a one-armed UDFA.
RichNhansom":28icsj1o said:austinslater25":28icsj1o said:I agree. You have two "A"'s in your passing game in Baldwins quickness and Graham's catch radius and size. You decide to throw a fade to a 5'10 receiver who might be your 4th best option. Brock said it yesterday, Pete even alluded to it being the wrong idea and multiple people see the same thing. I don't think Bevell is horrible but his situational play calling is just weird. I think the pro Bevell camp gets defensive because he really can and does do some great things. What keeps him out of the upper range is that when he misfires he misfires is ridiculous fashion. Slant pass to your special teams gunner? Then blame him for execution? This is the kind of stuff that the best oc's don't miss on. No one calls a perfect game but you can put your strengths and best personnel in the best opportunity to succeed and Bevell just flat out doesn't.
First off Kearse is 6'2" and he was one on one with a short (5'9" is what I heard) inexperienced CB.
This is being discussed on several threads also.
The play call was designed to get that exact match up and it worked perfect.
The problem happens when the defense shows blitz and at the last second shift. The DB is playing off the line giving Kearse inside leverage and Wilson makes the protection call but didn't feel he had enough time to audible to a slant. Had he been able to audible it is likely an easy TD.
The play call was excellent. Unfortunately the officials had let the clock run to burn any chance we had at getting closer or more than one shot from 10 yards out.
If you have to place blame it is on Wilson for the pass that was uncatcheable. If that ball is in play Kearse likely comes down with it and then the officials either call him out or throw another flag to take it away from us. At least that is what I suspect after everything else that occured in that game.