HawKnPeppa
New member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2009
- Messages
- 4,733
- Reaction score
- 0
"He looked like he fit" ...and what were all you detractors saying? [FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY][FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY] I'm excited for the kid.
Kearse has an innate ability to judge spacing on a play. I listened to him explain a touchdown catch once where he was in the slot as a Hawk. He explained the spacing of a cover 2 scheme was such that he had to draw a safety out wide so he purposely started the route out wide to draw the safety out and then cut skinny just inside of the safety for the TD catch.AgentDib":1fqf3f17 said:I'm fully on board with the Kasen Williams hype. The ability to catch a football is majorly underrated somehow but Kasen showed in his first year that he could do exactly what people are clamoring for big WRs to do. He could jump out of the stadium, get his hands on the football, and either bring it down himself or make sure nobody did. I've always liked him a lot more than Kearse who seems to have two negative plays for every two great plays.
Yes, Kasen wasn't nearly the same player after his injury and in order to have a shot he needs to finally be healthy again which he is probably isn't. But still, this is exactly the sort of UDFA player you want to root for because his upside is a lot higher than most.
There's no doubt about Kearse's ability to make big plays; he's already filled a decent highlight reel if you include his career at UW, or even just his last game against Baylor. In my opinion his best stat coming into the NFL was that his red zone conversion rate exceeded 40% his last three seasons, which was very good if you think about the Huskies '10 and '11 offenses.vin.couve12":1sj9t3yv said:Kearse has had his share of negative plays. That's not disputed. However, Kearse is on the field because the game really seems to come easy for him, aside from his good deep speed, good catching radius, and ability to win at the high point and generally just make amazing plays.
Nice post.AgentDib":ojwovcgh said:There's no doubt about Kearse's ability to make big plays; he's already filled a decent highlight reel if you include his career at UW, or even just his last game against Baylor. In my opinion his best stat coming into the NFL was that his red zone conversion rate exceeded 40% his last three seasons, which was very good if you think about the Huskies '10 and '11 offenses.vin.couve12":ojwovcgh said:Kearse has had his share of negative plays. That's not disputed. However, Kearse is on the field because the game really seems to come easy for him, aside from his good deep speed, good catching radius, and ability to win at the high point and generally just make amazing plays.
My concern is that on this team there's a strong benefit to a receiver having a high floor. When you have a dominant defense and are generally favored the goal should be to reduce uncertainty, because the way superior teams lose games is by facing uncertainty and getting unlucky. I can't explain why Kearse has had such diverse outcomes but I would give up a decent amount of expected output in order to avoid a few more three and outs or interceptions. What Williams doesn't get enough credit for was his catching strength and ability to box cornerbacks out, and the chance that he could recover his 2013 form is worth being excited about even if it's a long shot.
Well that settles it, eh? Good for him, glad he's here to comPETE!Jville":31nzv1ce said:[instagram]https://instagram.com/p/2tao8ljEmh/[/instagram]
Chawks1":27t3p2tc said: