adeltaY
New member
Wentz will get more than either of them, so RW won't be the highest paid for long.
seahawkfreak":2og6utm4 said:Not pointing any fingers but there are quite a few here that start hand wringing when RW doesn't get top 5 or elite status in the media. If we want a good QB we are going to have to pay for him. I obviously cant prove it but I don't think we win a SB in 2013 without RW.
fenderbender123":3k6w9ajj said:Nope...we drafted a Wilson before, we can do it again. It's not like we just lucked our way into a Super Bowl win.
Priority 1 = Have the best defense in the league
Priority 2 = Have a good running game
Priority 3 = Have a good QB
mrt144":2gwdbdxy said:fenderbender123":2gwdbdxy said:They stopped promoting competition. That's part of why the players we drafted in those drafts didn't pan out...they didn't try as hard. They also didn't even draft a QB to compete with Wilson...they were just looking for a backup.
I don't know.
How do you compete as a rookie against arguably the best players at the position in the NFL? Are the odds good that a 4th round safety or corner or MLB would supplant either ET or Sherman or Wagner and thus worth using that pick on? Part of the entire point of landing those whales is so you can throw draft capital around to places that sorely need it. In theory at least. The Hawks are an interesting case on defense of being so top heavy that it would be easy to mistake starters not getting supplanted as competition being lacking but...
Is your argument about a lack of competition aimed at the 'not best in the NFL players' on the team? Perhaps that dovetails with simply not drafting well enough for those positions like OL so that no matter how many tossed their hats in the ring, it was deficient in outcome. I would be surprised if the positions we turned over the most season to season weren't also our worst position groups. OL, WR, RB, CB opposite Sherman, DT.
What is the point of churn and turning over the roster every 3 seasons if not trying to find your best fits? Sometimes how bad you want something isn't going to overcome HOF talent making HOF money.
Tical21":o1cg06iu said:Since 1999, only one qb has won a super bowl while being one of the 5 highest paid quarterbacks. Zero have cost over 13.5% of team's cap. Just because everyone else is driving off a bridge, doesn't mean you have to.
Of course you have to pay your franchise quarterback. Of course you do. But, maybe
...
Manning with the Colts. The asterisk being, they probably had the worst roster to win a SB in 20 years, because of his contract. Typically, guys win a Super Bowl on their first or lesser contract, get paid, and then the roster suffers for several years and they don't win it again. Then, there is a bit of a second window at the end of their contract as the cap increases around it. Then they get paid again and......rjdriver":10e1ykw3 said:Tical21":10e1ykw3 said:Since 1999, only one qb has won a super bowl while being one of the 5 highest paid quarterbacks. Zero have cost over 13.5% of team's cap. Just because everyone else is driving off a bridge, doesn't mean you have to.
Of course you have to pay your franchise quarterback. Of course you do. But, maybe
...
Fascinating.
I mean, I would have figured that Manning, Brees, Rodgers, and maybe Brady would be on the list.
Who’s the one ?
rjdriver":186692rc said:Tical21":186692rc said:Since 1999, only one qb has won a super bowl while being one of the 5 highest paid quarterbacks. Zero have cost over 13.5% of team's cap. Just because everyone else is driving off a bridge, doesn't mean you have to.
Of course you have to pay your franchise quarterback. Of course you do. But, maybe
...
Fascinating.
I mean, I would have figured that Manning, Brees, Rodgers, and maybe Brady would be on the list.
Who’s the one ?
No, he wasn't. He got a big raise directly after. He made 9 million in the 2011 season, 11.2 in 2012.hawknation2018":1pdu1zvc said:rjdriver":1pdu1zvc said:Tical21":1pdu1zvc said:Since 1999, only one qb has won a super bowl while being one of the 5 highest paid quarterbacks. Zero have cost over 13.5% of team's cap. Just because everyone else is driving off a bridge, doesn't mean you have to.
Of course you have to pay your franchise quarterback. Of course you do. But, maybe
...
Fascinating.
I mean, I would have figured that Manning, Brees, Rodgers, and maybe Brady would be on the list.
Who’s the one ?
Eli Manning definitely was among the Top 5 highest paid when he won his 2nd Super Bowl with the Giants.
Spin Doctor":1v8w77xt said:Hell no. No QB is worth that much money under current CBA rules. It hamstrings the rest of the team, and while a QB is vital to the success of a team, having that much of your salary cap tied into one player really affects the ability of a team to build around the QB. Especially under Pete Carroll, whom neglects his star QB on a regular basis.
TreeRon":2z3j5vkh said:Is Tom Cruise worth whatever he makes every year, Liam Neeson, Idris Elba, and so on. Entertainers all, and NFL players work a lot harder and are subject to injury at any moment while performing.
All of them make way too much but we are happy to pay them at the ticket office, turnstyle and with the products we buy that the NFL advertises and endorses.