BASF
Well-known member
John63":nw3kh108 said:BASF":nw3kh108 said:John63":nw3kh108 said:LOL it took you almost 2 months to reply
You are the one that posted the link yesterday, inviting others to review it.
John63":nw3kh108 said:Ahh not sure what point you are making, you cherry picked part of my post, I was showing game were we ran a different system, I can point to the 2nd half of almost any game too, as Huard another have said. So good for you, wasted post that really did nothing, as I will always take experts over fans with agendas.
My point was that you are misrepresenting things in your post. The run game was doing just as well early in the season as it was the second half of the season until the injuries to the linemen and backs. It is the same with misrepresenting that we do not run route combinations with layers. If you actually look at film, you will see it, instead of taking "experts" who are doing their best to generate viewers, word for it.
No I am not misrepresenting anything, the point was Wilson can kill it with or without a run game
That said Run game doing well early in the season lets see, not counting Wilsons running
Game one 64 yards 3 ypc yeah that is great NOT
Game 2 now here we did well, noone over 100 yards but 130 total and 4.7 ypc
Game 3 57 yards, 3 ypc NOT GOOD
Game 4 108 good, 4.3 ypc good
So first 4 a mix bag 2 good 2 bag, does not change what I meant by the system though, the reality is we struggled early first qtr of the season, then picked it up, and then struggled late. None of which changes my point which was Wilson can perform with or without a run game and has proven it.
As I said, we performed as well in the second part of the season as the first. You chose two games in the first half, and I can easily point out the Rams and Cardinals games in the second half that were almost a mirror of those two games, but with worse defenses (the Saints {game 3} had one of the best run defenses in football).
John63":nw3kh108 said:And FYI I posted to show some of the very negative views some on here have of Wilson and you took it way off chart.
FYI I do look at Film and you are right we do run rout combo in the 2nd half when we change the tempo, in first half yeah no. If you can't see the huge difference in the style of play form one half to another than, well you are not looking and as I said I will go with the experts most of whom are saying the same thing. So again good for you but wasted post
I do agree with you that we change the tempo in the second half when trailing, and I do agree with you that it is a good thing. Where I do not agree with you, is your steadfast refusal to admit that the defense is playing differently when they are up three scores and allowing us to run clock by completing passes in front of them. If you watch film, you can see that when we are trying for the quick passing game that you have been baying for in the first half, the team we are playing is playing press and filling passing lanes and the Seahawks are not nearly as successful in those situations.