FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
So predictable. Bunch’s dudes with no objectivity, not knowing the rules, manufacturing outrage.
He was down
- Thread starter pmedic920
- Start date
cdn hawk fan
Well-known member
- Joined
- Jul 26, 2011
- Messages
- 1,080
- Reaction score
- 235
I am surprised the refs did not throw a flag for the low hit on the qb ankle. That is a low hit so it should be 15 yards
oldhawkfan
Well-known member
I just don’t know how that can be called an INT. His elbow was down then his knee was down. Bobby didn’t take the ball until his ass was also down.
Hawkpower
Well-known member
Every. Single. Week
At least we expect to get hosed now
At least we expect to get hosed now
OP
OP
And the explanation is….
Called on field as interception.
WTF is replay for, if not to make sure the correct call was made “on the field”?
Called on field as interception.
WTF is replay for, if not to make sure the correct call was made “on the field”?
FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
Wait, I thought it was the NFL’s anti-small market bias?
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2015
- Messages
- 6,351
- Reaction score
- 4,786
Because the refs can choose to just ignore if it's the "correct call"
OP
OP
Hawkpower
Well-known member
That standard sure didn’t help us last week with Metcalf did it?
Selective standards
FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
I greatly dislike the current definition of what is or isn’t a catch, but he didn’t complete the catch by those rules.
Of course we're not objective. We're Seahawk fans posting on a Seahawks forum. We're not even trying to claim objectivity.
What rule do you mean? The ball was caught, not moving, knee down.
If you mean the rule about "completing the catch" NO ONE, including the refs, knows what that rule means. It gets interpreted every week differently by different refs and different announcers.
Outrage not manufactured. It was a bad non-reversal.
FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
Sorry, I’ll just whine and cry about the refs, the NFL and Vegas every time I don’t like something. That’ll let me fit in then!
- Joined
- Nov 29, 2015
- Messages
- 6,351
- Reaction score
- 4,786
ALL SEASON
Hawkpower
Well-known member
It’s what Fatty lives for
hawkcrazzed
Well-known member
They need LA to win cause reasons
OP
OP
Like I said “your insights”.
You’re completely within your rights to have an opinion. So are the other members here in GameDay chat. Try to keep that in mind please.
W
Welshers
Guest
Do you literally work for the NFL? I never even see you talking about the Seahawks. The sole reason you come on here is to defend the officiating. Strange!
JGreen79
Well-known member
Regardless if the call was correct or not. That INT was just Bobby doing Bobby things. Really wish he was still here.
cymatica
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 25, 2014
- Messages
- 4,429
- Reaction score
- 3,126
No, you prefer to whine and cry about fan reactions
FattyKnuckle
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2020
- Messages
- 1,480
- Reaction score
- 986
At least it’s against some thing that’s actually happening.
