Coach

[NFSeahawks]

Be very careful.

You may feel that Carroll is not doing a great job with some of the great players he has. But remember, many of those great players are here because of Carroll.

Remember George Karl?

People were so upset because Karl was not doing well in the playoffs. We solved that problem by getting rid of Karl and bringing in Westphal (or however you spell it). He helped us with messing up in the playoffs by just missing the playoffs entirely. Just a worthless coach, but we brought him in because we were tired of Karl's 'failures'.

He was so much worse.

When we get rid of Carroll, we have a much better chance of getting another Westphal than we do a MacMillan. Other words, you might be frustrated occasionally but when we do lose Carroll it will get so much worse.

You flip-flop alot. I’ve read numerous posts that said you wanted Carroll gone, and now you want to keep him.

Assuming another coach would be worse is assuming Pete is the best in the league, and he’s not.

 

[Hawkstorian]

I seem to recall the 90s generally sucking.

What! We had Stan Gelbaugh!

 

[Mad Dog]

Be very careful.

You may feel that Carroll is not doing a great job with some of the great players he has. But remember, many of those great players are here because of Carroll.

Remember George Karl?

People were so upset because Karl was not doing well in the playoffs. We solved that problem by getting rid of Karl and bringing in Westphal (or however you spell it). He helped us with messing up in the playoffs by just missing the playoffs entirely. Just a worthless coach, but we brought him in because we were tired of Karl's 'failures'.

He was so much worse.

When we get rid of Carroll, we have a much better chance of getting another Westphal than we do a MacMillan. Other words, you might be frustrated occasionally but when we do lose Carroll it will get so much worse.

You flip-flop alot. I’ve read numerous posts that said you wanted Carroll gone, and now you want to keep him.

Assuming another coach would be worse is assuming Pete is the best in the league, and he’s not.

You generally can't get the "best in the NFL" because they are under contract. So another coach isn't going to be one of those guys. And since on average most new coaches get fired within a few years of being hired, it's not a stretch to assume we would most likely go downhill with a new guy. It's not necessarily going to be true but it's a bigger gamble than I think any team should take.

But we've had people arguing trading Russell and trying to draft another guy of his caliber. So there is no lack of stupidity on football forums.

 

[AgentDib]

Assuming another coach would be worse is assuming Pete is the best in the league, and he’s not.

This logic could use further explanation, unless you intend to argue that our next unknown coach will definitely be the best coach in the league.

 

[nanomoz]

This team is worse than the 2-14 team of 1992? Piss off.

 

[hawksfansinceday1]

I seem to recall the 90s generally sucking.

What! We had Stan Gelbaugh!

I see your Stan Gelbaugh and raise you a Kelly Stouffer

 

[chris98251]

I seem to recall the 90s generally sucking.

What! We had Stan Gelbaugh!

I see your Stan Gelbaugh and raise you a Kelly Stouffer

Call with Dan McGwire.

 

[Maulbert]

I seem to recall the 90s generally sucking.

What! We had Stan Gelbaugh!

I see your Stan Gelbaugh and raise you a Kelly Stouffer

Call with Dan McGwire.

THE TRIFORCE!