rsm650
New member
4BlatantAgent9":z1sv3d4j said:And as for you sir, Yes I was born in Jan. of '86. So technically I've been alive for 4 out of 5 but I can only remember 1. And the tropheys comment goes hand in hand with all the 42-13 etc. etc. sigs that I see on here. You're so quick to talk about those games but u wanna start crying and sniffling when someone mentions rings or tropheys. But I can appreciete what you're trying to do, so I'll keep it a bit more recent. Seattle traveled to Atlanta and lost...San Fran traveled to Atlanta and won, thus we represented the NFC in the SB. Not Seattle, not Atlanta, not GB. WE are the reigning NFC champs and until that changes you'll have nothing to brag about save for a few regular season blowouts. I apoligize that this is off topic with the Kap/Wilson debate but I believe this forum needs shaken up a bit. There's too many posts of u guys slapping each other on the ass. You know,congratulating each other on having the best QB the world has ever seen.
Congrats on beating Atlanta and representing the NFC in XLVII. Therefore, the 49ers have accomplished more than the Seahawks during the 2012 season. Kaep is a good QB - he is not garbage. There, I said it!
However, we are in the 2013 season. The Seahawks are missing key OL, Harvin, and Wagner, while the 49ers are missing key WR and a few DL. The Seahawks beat the 49ers 29-3. I don't know when this turned into a discussion of which great team is better...All we are discussing is Bruce Arians's comment about Wilson and Kaep. Personally, I think Wilson is better than Kaep. Does that mean Kaep is a terrible QB? No. Do I have homer glasses on? Maybe.