brimsalabim
Active member
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 4,509
- Reaction score
- 3
https://www.buffalorumblings.com/20...fl-record-for-consecutive-50-yard-field-goals
How much did we save again?
How much did we save again?
Haush hit 90% last year and was 1-1 over 50 yards. His only problem was the missed extra points, but guess who else had that same issue?Uncle Si":3jwl9ays said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
I think Haush's problem may have been the long snapper. If I recall we had some big issues with our long snapper after we let Gresham go.Uncle Si":3pzuzcsq said:Im not saying trading him for Walsh was a good move. But, Haush has turned it around a lot since leaving. Credit to him.
massari":jrvnpnup said:Haush hit 90% last year and was 1-1 over 50 yards. His only problem was the missed extra points, but guess who else had that same issue?Uncle Si":jrvnpnup said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
Haush also made every FG attempt in the playoffs last season and has only ever missed once for his career in the playoffs.
Haush is proven to be clutch while Walsh a headcase.
Bullocks! Haush only has an average cap hit of $2.95M per season over 3 years and only $4M guaranteed. That's a pretty fair contract for a proven clutch kicker. Blair Walsh has a $1.1M cap hit this season. Stephen Gostkowski has an average cap hit of $4.3M with $10.1M guaranteed.Chapow":197c1yl7 said:massari":197c1yl7 said:Haush hit 90% last year and was 1-1 over 50 yards. His only problem was the missed extra points, but guess who else had that same issue?
Haush also made every FG attempt in the playoffs last season and has only ever missed once for his career in the playoffs.
Haush is proven to be clutch while Walsh a headcase.
Hausch missed 6 extra points last season and 2 FGs of under 30 yards and you think the Seahawks should have given him a nice new contract? Sorry, I'm calling BS. Maybe you think that now, but I'd bet money that you would have been one of the people here calling for heads to roll if they had given him a new contract in the off season after the year he had.
Chapow":1ktbke7a said:massari":1ktbke7a said:Haush hit 90% last year and was 1-1 over 50 yards. His only problem was the missed extra points, but guess who else had that same issue?Uncle Si":1ktbke7a said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
Haush also made every FG attempt in the playoffs last season and has only ever missed once for his career in the playoffs.
Haush is proven to be clutch while Walsh a headcase.
Hausch missed 6 extra points last season and 2 FGs of under 30 yards and you think the Seahawks should have given him a nice new contract? Sorry, I'm calling BS. Maybe you think that now, but I'd bet money that you would have been one of the people here calling for heads to roll if they had given him a new contract in the off season after the year he had.
Oh, and blaming the long snapper is a joke. The vast majority of his snaps were perfectly fine. Gresham wasn't perfect either.
MontanaHawk05":3c75tlhi said:Chapow":3c75tlhi said:massari":3c75tlhi said:Haush hit 90% last year and was 1-1 over 50 yards. His only problem was the missed extra points, but guess who else had that same issue?Uncle Si":3c75tlhi said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
Haush also made every FG attempt in the playoffs last season and has only ever missed once for his career in the playoffs.
Haush is proven to be clutch while Walsh a headcase.
Hausch missed 6 extra points last season and 2 FGs of under 30 yards and you think the Seahawks should have given him a nice new contract? Sorry, I'm calling BS. Maybe you think that now, but I'd bet money that you would have been one of the people here calling for heads to roll if they had given him a new contract in the off season after the year he had.
Oh, and blaming the long snapper is a joke. The vast majority of his snaps were perfectly fine. Gresham wasn't perfect either.
Nolan Frese was routinely getting knocked on his ass while blocking and did indeed have a few errant snaps. He was worse than either Gresham or Ott.
Uncle Si":2zqqmx0g said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
MrThortan":35jzew21 said:Uncle Si":35jzew21 said:Hausch needed the change of scenery. He was not great for the Hawks last year.
We often see players that were released play well in their new homes. I think there is definitely something to a change of scenery and how it impacts player performance
Chapow":1vruu418 said:Hausch missed 6 extra points last season and 2 FGs of under 30 yards and you think the Seahawks should have given him a nice new contract? Sorry, I'm calling BS. Maybe you think that now, but I'd bet money that you would have been one of the people here calling for heads to roll if they had given him a new contract in the off season after the year he had.
Oh, and blaming the long snapper is a joke. The vast majority of his snaps were perfectly fine. Gresham wasn't perfect either.