nepahawk
Member
the ditch":1534gsuj said:That's disappointing, his NFL career is done if his appeal doesn't win.
Schefter reported he had his appeal already,IIRC.
the ditch":1534gsuj said:That's disappointing, his NFL career is done if his appeal doesn't win.
Smelly McUgly":3j01wl3u said:I mean, I feel like as long as we go 3-2 and get Thurm back for the playoffs, we'll be okay. It's not like an asteroid hit Earl Thomas and knocked his corpse into Richard Sherman's car, causing Sherm to swerve off a bridge and into a canyon full of jagged rocks.
On the other hand, I am at a loss for words that Browner makes it out of the CFL only to do his best to whiff on a decent NFL contract for the only time in his career and head right back to the CFL.
TheRealDTM":a1s5v0x9 said:Do we actually know if any of this is true?
seahawks08":3jrwljx3 said:I think if you appeal you can get it down. I know with the Saints bounty gate, there were players who were suspended for a year that got reduced if I remember right but Sean Payton had to serve one year and Greg was indefinitely but got reinstated after the year. But in terms of 1 year, it means a whole season, not number of games.
Basis4day":1ovgp4to said:Cartire":1ovgp4to said:I don't understand was constitutes a year long ban for him. It can't just be weed or peds.
He is in the substance abuse program by his own admission last year, which means he gets tested more often than other players.
I need to step away from the computer and let this sort itself out.
RussellMania":1c30neua said:Haven't seen any links to an ESPN story
On Browner? Yes. This is disappointing for sure we're fairly deep in the secondary and this can be mitigated by shifting more to the offense specifically Wilson.bestfightstory":3nw4p122 said:Are we allowed to be angry yet? CANHawk? KCHawk'girl'?
I'm going to wait until the time is deemed appropriate to express my outrage at this turn of events.
Don't think it matters what it is, he is done, we have some selfish players on this team who need to grow and take there job seriously.Cartire":37k5giwi said:Basis4day":37k5giwi said:Cartire":37k5giwi said:I don't understand was constitutes a year long ban for him. It can't just be weed or peds.
He is in the substance abuse program by his own admission last year, which means he gets tested more often than other players.
I need to step away from the computer and let this sort itself out.
Except he's never been suspended for substance abuse. If he's on the program and failed, it's should only be a 4 game suspension.
You don't combined the PED program and substance abuse program.
seahawks08":1f6d7w8c said:Players sometimes over celebrate being 10-1. Yes, it sometimes make them dumb expecting not to be tested randomly, even though I sense a pattern of randomness when it comes to the Seahawks. I don't blame Pete and John, but why didn't we see this in Holmgren era, is it more the rules have changed with the new CBA?