I give him credit for the amount of time and effort that he obviously puts in. He is definitely invested in the team. On the other hand, I find myself disagreeing with him much too often. His arguments tend to weigh in favor of idealism as opposed to realism. Not saying he can't be realistic because he often is. He just tries to impose his idealistic vision for the team a bit too much. It is as if he perceives his own vision for the team to be better than JS and PC. As an example, he really tries to portray himself as a one-man scouting combine prior to the draft. No one, that doesn't physically travel to observe prospects, can know what he authoritatively projects to know. I could see it with a handful of players, but not at the broad scope that he attempts to portray. He will then take that self-perceived encyclopedic knowledge and grade the draft as if he was more informed than the entire Seahawk scouting department. That is just an example off of the top of my head.