I think it’s Carter at 5. Call it a hunch. If it happens how do you feel about that pick?
I think it’s Carter at 5. Call it a hunch. If it happens how do you feel about that pick?
I'm fine with Carter or Will Anderson.I think it’s Carter at 5. Call it a hunch. If it happens how do you feel about that pick?
Anderson, Carter or Trade.I'd be thrilled with Carter, Anderson, or Richardson. Please let it be one of those guys.
I think it’s Carter at 5. Call it a hunch. If it happens how do you feel about that pick?
You have a very good chance of getting what you want. If Cards take Anderson, then Indy is not going to be able to draft both these guys!Nope for me. I have my fingers crossed for either Carter or Richardson.
He better be more like Suh and less like Malik McDowellI think it’s Carter at 5. Call it a hunch. If it happens how do you feel about that pick?
I understand your point. I do however think Seattle has a different mindset.So, judging by the majority of responses here, I guess we're pinning our long term qb hopes on Hooker, or some other mid round prospect, or later round pick in '24, instead of getting a high round pick (which have higher hit rates than lower round picks) now when we have a great opportunity to do so, and the draft capital to still address our defense. I don't understand that reasoning, but I certainly don't pretend to have the answers. The logic of it just escapes me.
It's a bit more nuanced than this.So, judging by the majority of responses here, I guess we're pinning our long term qb hopes on Hooker, or some other mid round prospect, or later round pick in '24, instead of getting a high round pick (which have higher hit rates than lower round picks) now when we have a great opportunity to do so, and the draft capital to still address our defense. I don't understand that reasoning, but I certainly don't pretend to have the answers. The logic of it just escapes me.
No to trading up for a DE and no to Carter at #5 overall.
There's a good chance that Anderson will be available at #5 as it's looking like 3 quarterbacks may fall in the top 4 picks, and even if we wanted Carter, which I doubt that he's even on our board, he could be had for a pick somewhere outside the top 10.
It's an informed opinion to have. It's a likely reality, considering the front office being fairly strict about off-field red flags from 2018 onward. They've been transparent about how they strictly want to look for mature, reliable players for the organization and how they've enormously shrunk their draft board since the McDowell incident.
Because the chances of all 4QB's hitting are low.So, judging by the majority of responses here, I guess we're pinning our long term qb hopes on Hooker, or some other mid round prospect, or later round pick in '24, instead of getting a high round pick (which have higher hit rates than lower round picks) now when we have a great opportunity to do so, and the draft capital to still address our defense. I don't understand that reasoning, but I certainly don't pretend to have the answers. The logic of it just escapes me.