coorslighthawk
Member
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 414
- Reaction score
- 24
No link but just heard on the Clayton show. Hopefully this is just a salary cap issue and can come back.
coorslighthawk":1t9sonta said:No link but just heard on the Clayton show. Hopefully this is just a salary cap issue and can come back.
kidhawk":3oya87j5 said:coorslighthawk":3oya87j5 said:No link but just heard on the Clayton show. Hopefully this is just a salary cap issue and can come back.
He really wasn't very expensive. I just think it's a matter of needing a roster spot and having an abundance of depth here.
gowazzu02":2q8pvtt0 said:kidhawk":2q8pvtt0 said:coorslighthawk":2q8pvtt0 said:No link but just heard on the Clayton show. Hopefully this is just a salary cap issue and can come back.
He really wasn't very expensive. I just think it's a matter of needing a roster spot and having an abundance of depth here.
That would appear to be our answer about if we're moving Hollister or not.
At the end of the day, I like it. Hollister has proven to be a stud. The kid out of Stanford who's back and taking Double L's spot hasn't yet.
I like a top 3 of Olsen, Hollister, and Dissly.
It's good depth, but we've seen that depth can go from great to a mash unit quickly.
Especially considering Olsens age and Disslys track record.
Moves like that are probably better left to the off-season.rcaido":65jz28hm said:Should have traded Hollister for draft pick...I like both but cutting Luke gets you nothing.
rcaido":1f2a8mp3 said:Should have traded Hollister for draft pick...I like both but cutting Luke gets you nothing.
Sgt. Largent":2fto9jd5 said:rcaido":2fto9jd5 said:Should have traded Hollister for draft pick...I like both but cutting Luke gets you nothing.
Not sure trading a 3rd string TE for a 7th round pick is better than keeping him as insurance, and who contributes on gameday.