Because two years in a row we get bounced because of him. A year before that Russell had to play injured the whole year, account for 95% of the offence and still finish 9-7 (with a god awful kicker who cost at least couple games). Three year of failure should be enough to legitimately consider a...
We don't know. But what I do know is that Wilson wins despite terrible rosters and piss poor gameday decisions. Brees, Rodgers etc have shown that they can't do it. Only Brady and Wilson have. And you will very rarely hear anyone say that Belichick didn't utilise Brady well.
Payton and Harbaugh never had a quarterback of Russell Wilson's calibre. It should be painfully obvious to everyone that it is Russell who wins games, not Pete. He's not a bad coach, but he simply isn't what we need right now. We need someone who doesn't need Russell Wilson to dig him out the...
He is not flawless as no player is, but tonight when he was allowed to shine he was, honestly, just unbelievable. As in I couldn't believe we actually have THIS guy as our quarterback and we lost two playoff games in 2 years because he wasn't given an opportunity to play football for the whole game
Belichick doesn't hope to maximize the talent. He does maximize. We can't keep deadweight on hoping they pan out. And since you mentioned Belichick, he's the quickest to pull the trigger on getting a guy cut or traded. Terrible example