Seahawks TC Preview (Per Grant Gordon/NFL.com)

SocialParasite

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2019
Messages
3,720
Reaction score
5,809
Location
Central Valley, CA

Three key storylines

1) Darnold staying on point

Sam Darnold authored a storybook tale last season. Once viewed as a mega bust, Darnold quarterbacked the Seahawks -- his fourth NFL team following the Jets, who used the 2018 NFL Draft’s third overall pick on him -- to a Super Bowl title. Darnold seemingly exorcised the ghosts of his past, but he is still only 29 and has plenty to play for. He’s back with the pressure of defending a championship. Can he provide an encore, earn a lucrative extension and keep Seattle atop the league? New offensive coordinator Brian Fleury’s system is similar to the departed Klint Kubiak’s, but change is change, and Darnold must learn the differences. Continuity in the receiving corps should help, with Jaxon Smith-Njigba leading a group that also includes Cooper Kupp, Jake Bobo and Rashid Shaheed, the last of whom should command a bigger role in the aerial attack after re-signing on a lucrative deal in March. Furthermore, Tory Horton flashed as a rookie last season before suffering a shin injury. The speedster's return could have a dynamic domino effect, adding another bona fide threat at receiver and another big-play option in the return game, which could open up more possibilities for Shaheed in both avenues. There’s also optimism for a major breakout at tight end. AJ Barner, who scored the Seahawks’ only offensive touchdown in the Super Bowl, became a dude in his second season (52 receptions, 519 yards, six TDs) and might well become a Pro Bowl-caliber player in Year 3 if his chemistry with Darnold continues.

2) What's the frequency without Kenneth?

With Kenneth Walker III having signed with Kansas City and Zach Charbonnet (ACL) most likely absent to begin the season, all eyes will be on first-round draft pick Jadarian Price. The Notre Dame product is a smooth runner who averaged 6 yards per carry in his career with the Fighting Irish. However, he was Jeremiyah Love's understudy and had 15-plus touches just once in his 41 games at ND. The Seahawks were adamant in balancing Walker and Charbonnet last season before the latter was injured. Asking Price to take on a bell-cow workload would seem unlikely. Camp could preview what kind of roles are in store for other backs like George Holani and Emanuel Wilson. Perhaps Rashid Shaheed could be used a bit in the run game, too. The wide receiver corps, along with the Charles Cross-led offensive line, are the offensive strengths. But Seattle wants balance. That starts with Price and will take shape before Week 1.

3) Can Seahawks avoid noise again?

In case you might have forgotten -- and judging by the lack of offseason pomp and circumstance, many have -- the Seahawks are the reigning Super Bowl champions. For a franchise that boasts one of the loudest home-field advantages, the volume for a post-Lombardi offseason has seemingly been turned down to negative-11. That seems to be the preference for Mike Macdonald's Seahawks, though. They snuck up on some people last season, and, after winning the most arduous division in football, trounced the Patriots in the Super Bowl. This year, Jaxon Smith-Njigba’s not going to catch anyone by surprise. The reigning Offensive Player of the Year had a fine 2024, hitting 100 catches and exceeding 1,100 yards, but he was an absolute force last season, leading the league with 1,793 receiving yards and quickly erasing any doubt as to how the passing game would fare without DK Metcalf. Also, while JSN got PAID this offseason, his fellow 2023 first-rounder, Devon Witherspoon, has yet to -- posing a potential problem for the Seahawks. Right guard Anthony Bradford started all 17 games last year -- his third season in a row of starting the majority of the Seahawks’ games. He garnered a 51.9 overall PFF grade, which ranked 70th among the 81 guards who took at least 300 snaps. Could fifth-rounder Beau Stephens replace him and solidify a longtime sore spot for Seattle’s starting lineup? General manager John Schneider was able to keep most of the Lombardi band together, but losing Walker, outside linebacker Boye Mafe, cornerback Tariq Woolen and safety Coby Bryant isn’t nothing. Keeping everything quiet and copacetic is far more difficult when you're defending champs, so it’s paramount for Macdonald and Schneider to figure out any issues before they grow into problems.
 

Blitzhawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2010
Messages
2,584
Reaction score
202
In case you might have forgotten -- and judging by the lack of offseason pomp and circumstance, many have -- the Seahawks are the reigning Super Bowl champions. For a franchise that boasts one of the loudest home-field advantages, the volume for a post-Lombardi offseason has seemingly been turned down to negative-11.

Uhh yea, mostly by the mediots in denial. Although, I would have to add, we still do not care.
 

Jac

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 18, 2009
Messages
1,958
Reaction score
1,857
In case you might have forgotten -- and judging by the lack of offseason pomp and circumstance, many have -- the Seahawks are the reigning Super Bowl champions. For a franchise that boasts one of the loudest home-field advantages, the volume for a post-Lombardi offseason has seemingly been turned down to negative-11.

Uhh yea, mostly by the mediots in denial. Although, I would have to add, we still do not care.

Much to the media's chagrin who want to pump the Rams and see this team fade away, Macdonald is going to have them prepared each week and Schneider is going to keep the roster stocked with young talent. We may not win the SB this year (who knows either way), but this team isn't going away and is set up for long-term success far better than our NFC West rivals.
 

RehireMora

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Messages
377
Reaction score
429
I thought that article was the most fair of all the articles that I have read during the off season.

I am just as sick as anyone about hearing how great the Rams will be, but they did improve and we just (at best) maintained.

This off season showed that players don't want the ring anymore, they want the money. Being Super Bowl champs means nothing when recruiting, I think we picked up one decent player?
 

RehireMora

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2025
Messages
377
Reaction score
429
I wholeheartedly disagree, I believe every potential recruit wants to sign with a winning team, and having a great culture even accentuates it.
Okay, but why didn't they? What is the reason players are not flocking to the world champs?

Yes, there could be other reasons like players talk and this isn't the place to be, JS isn't doing his job of recruiting or other reasons.

The cap numbers are healthy and the needs are plenty. The entire draft was needs based, even to the desperation of selecting a backup in college in the first round.

If the history of the draft has proven 1 thing, it's that no draft pick is a guaranteed starter. That being said, there are still holes on this team.

I would like to think the players would want to be here, but they are not showing up.
 

Year of The Hawk

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,402
Reaction score
358
Location
Idaho
Okay, but why didn't they? What is the reason players are not flocking to the world champs?

Yes, there could be other reasons like players talk and this isn't the place to be, JS isn't doing his job of recruiting or other reasons.

The cap numbers are healthy and the needs are plenty. The entire draft was needs based, even to the desperation of selecting a backup in college in the first round.

If the history of the draft has proven 1 thing, it's that no draft pick is a guaranteed starter. That being said, there are still holes on this team.

I would like to think the players would want to be here, but they are not showing up.
To call our draft desperate show lack of insight. JP was the second best RB in the draft (possible the first but time will tell) and was only a backup because he chose to be. We did fill some holes with the draft for sure but that does not means it stinks of desperation. While we do have holes there is nothing we can’t make a run without filling. EVERY team has holes. We just have the fewest. The key IMHO is depth. I feel this team does a great job at building depth everywhere. As far as players showing up it is rookie camp right now. They have some basics to figure out before jumping in with he vets. In addition the vets didn’t have much of an off season (which I hope becomes a trend). Much deserved and needed rest. I have full confidence the vets will show up when they are supposed to. They have given us no reason not to believe in them.
 

GeekHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,595
Reaction score
2,540
Location
Orting WA, Great Northwet
"Darnold seemingly exorcised the ghosts of his past, but he is still only 29 and has plenty to play for. He’s back with the pressure of defending a championship. Can he provide an encore, earn a lucrative extension and keep Seattle atop the league? New offensive coordinator Brian Fleury’s system is similar to the departed Klint Kubiak’s, but change is change, and Darnold must learn the differences."

Umm... He had 14 regular-season wins year-before-last, and last year he changed teams, changed OCs, changed systems, and DID provide an encore with 14 regular-seasons wins again. Oh, AND a Lombardi by the way. This take makes no sense to me, he's already done everything (and more) than the article asks if he can.
 

pmedic920

Moderator
Moderator
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
33,893
Reaction score
10,441
Location
On the lake, Livingston Texas
Okay, but why didn't they? What is the reason players are not flocking to the world champs?

Yes, there could be other reasons like players talk and this isn't the place to be, JS isn't doing his job of recruiting or other reasons.

The cap numbers are healthy and the needs are plenty. The entire draft was needs based, even to the desperation of selecting a backup in college in the first round.

If the history of the draft has proven 1 thing, it's that no draft pick is a guaranteed starter. That being said, there are still holes on this team.

I would like to think the players would want to be here, but they are not showing up.


You have to have a spot/need before you go out recruiting
 

GeekHawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
9,595
Reaction score
2,540
Location
Orting WA, Great Northwet
Okay, but why didn't they? What is the reason players are not flocking to the world champs?

Yes, there could be other reasons like players talk and this isn't the place to be, JS isn't doing his job of recruiting or other reasons.

The cap numbers are healthy and the needs are plenty. The entire draft was needs based, even to the desperation of selecting a backup in college in the first round.

If the history of the draft has proven 1 thing, it's that no draft pick is a guaranteed starter. That being said, there are still holes on this team.

I would like to think the players would want to be here, but they are not showing up.
Didn't Dante Fowler flock to the world champs, in order to finally be competitive instead of being on the Cowgirls?

The desperation of picking a backup in the first round? You do understand that he would not have been a backup on literally any other college roster, right? And that our "first round pick" was #32 (since we were the WORLD CHAMPIONS)? Which is basically the first pick of the 2nd round.

Also, what "needs are plenty"? We've lost almost nobody from the roster that was the WORLD CHAMPIONS! Do you understand anything about what has happened in the last two seasons?

I thought that your username was ironic, but I'm afraid you might actually be serious. 🤔🤯:rolleyes:
 

cymatica

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 25, 2014
Messages
6,175
Reaction score
5,524
Okay, but why didn't they? What is the reason players are not flocking to the world champs?

Yes, there could be other reasons like players talk and this isn't the place to be, JS isn't doing his job of recruiting or other reasons.

The cap numbers are healthy and the needs are plenty. The entire draft was needs based, even to the desperation of selecting a backup in college in the first round.

If the history of the draft has proven 1 thing, it's that no draft pick is a guaranteed starter. That being said, there are still holes on this team.

I would like to think the players would want to be here, but they are not showing up.
Schneider has changed his approach to FA and he's been pretty vocal about it. It's possible they had more options that he didn't want to sign. They probably win 2-3 titles in the LOB days if they just paid Tate and cut their losses with Harvin
 

Hawkstud

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 22, 2025
Messages
290
Reaction score
363
I thought that article was the most fair of all the articles that I have read during the off season.

I am just as sick as anyone about hearing how great the Rams will be, but they did improve and we just (at best) maintained.

This off season showed that players don't want the ring anymore, they want the money. Being Super Bowl champs means nothing when recruiting, I think we picked up one decent player?
Maintained? BS., they have CONTINUETY that will keep them in contention.
Last off-season all the mediots could harp on was how the Seahawks would be in 4th place (behind the Cardinals HAHAHAHAHAAHA) AND that the Rams were going to be THE team that would lead and eventually become the Super Bowl Champs....WRONG!
Even some of our own here at .NET (including myself) thought that the Seahawks were still a year or two away from competing, and guess what, Mike Macdonald "DIDN'T CARE" and the rest is HISTORY.
To BE the BEST, you have to BEAT the BEST; The Seahawks ARE THE BEST, and their bringing home the Lombardi proved that.
Saying that the Rams made a couple splash acquisitions that put the Seahawks behind in the competition? Yeah, now all they have to do is PROVE IT!
 

Trackhawk

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2025
Messages
1,724
Reaction score
1,863
Where are these holes, and who are the free agents we failed to nab to fill them?

IMG 4242

Running back, maybe?

From what I can see we had no need to play it big in free agency this year, due to having a relatively stacked team topped off by the plethora of picks we have next year, and likely will continue to have year after year.

It appears that will be the strategy going forward. Stack picks, make very selective moves in free agency, and save cap space for home grown talent.
 

Seahwkgal

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2009
Messages
5,374
Reaction score
604
Location
Grand Haven, MI
To call our draft desperate show lack of insight. JP was the second best RB in the draft (possible the first but time will tell) and was only a backup because he chose to be. We did fill some holes with the draft for sure but that does not means it stinks of desperation. While we do have holes there is nothing we can’t make a run without filling. EVERY team has holes. We just have the fewest. The key IMHO is depth. I feel this team does a great job at building depth everywhere. As far as players showing up it is rookie camp right now. They have some basics to figure out before jumping in with he vets. In addition the vets didn’t have much of an off season (which I hope becomes a trend). Much deserved and needed rest. I have full confidence the vets will show up when they are supposed to. They have given us no reason not to believe in them.
It amazes me how some Hawk fans forget about how many FAs we lost after XLVIII. We lost a bunch(way more than this year)and many were solid starters. This offseason is so much less severe and we went to the next SB and damned well should have won it. My god, there are some serious negative Nancie’s and idiots out there and in this board. 🤦‍♀️
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,226
Reaction score
7,232
Where are these holes, and who are the free agents we failed to nab to fill them?

View attachment 80895

Running back, maybe?

From what I can see we had no need to play it big in free agency this year, due to having a relatively stacked team topped off by the plethora of picks we have next year, and likely will continue to have year after year.

It appears that will be the strategy going forward. Stack picks, make very selective moves in free agency, and save cap space for home grown talent.
Tenor
 

SoulfishHawk

Well-known member
Supporting Member
Joined
Sep 6, 2012
Messages
44,537
Reaction score
28,625
Location
Sammamish, WA
It amazes me how some Hawk fans forget about how many FAs we lost after XLVIII. We lost a bunch(way more than this year)and many were solid starters. This offseason is so much less severe and we went to the next SB and damned well should have won it. My god, there are some serious negative Nancie’s and idiots out there and in this board. 🤦‍♀️
No lies detected.
 

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,226
Reaction score
7,232
This off season showed that players don't want the ring anymore, they want the money.

Hmm… Correct me if I’m wrong, but players don’t play for free. It’s always been about the money — and getting as much as they can.

What about the guys who’ve never won a ring? Josh Allen, Lamar Jackson, and plenty of other highly paid players at every position still chase the bag.

Saying this offseason proves players ‘don’t want the ring anymore’ assumes that every player used to prioritize rings over money when they entered the league, and then suddenly flipped once they got one. That doesn’t hold up.

Bottom line: An NFL player’s priorities from Day 1 haven’t changed. It’s always been ‘Show me the money.’"
 
Last edited:

glenwo2

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 12, 2025
Messages
6,226
Reaction score
7,232
BTW, sarcasm aside :

The Hawks DID have players who want $ over a ring (or at least acted like it with their antics) :

Remember Riq Woolen?

And how about DK "The Grass is always Greener" Metcalf? 😏
 
Top