theENGLISHseahawk
Active member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2009
- Messages
- 9,977
- Reaction score
- 0
Discuss...
kearly":3nak1vjr said:Honestly, I haven't even broke him down yet. Once I heard the story about his wanting to leave USC because of a decrease in targets, that made me wary about how he'd fit in an offense where he might get 3-5 targets a game. Course, maybe he just wanted out because the lack of targets was hurting his draft stock? Either way, I want unselfish receivers and tight ends, and I'm pretty sure that's a high priority for Pete as well.
FWIW, I wouldn't rule out Woods being a Seahawk. He ran a 4.51 and has moves after the catch. Obviously, Pete Carroll would be familiar with him.
My most underrated player threw the passes Robert Woods caught.
Recon_Hawk":1pvnz7yd said:You might be a bit too harsh on Woods, kip.
It just seems you don't like him much based on a couple of things he said that may have been taken out if context or overblown. Not worth avoiding his tape over.kearly":37hnmlyy said:Recon_Hawk":37hnmlyy said:You might be a bit too harsh on Woods, kip.
I was being harsh? I have nothing against Woods. I was just wondering if Pete might for reasons stated.
Wenhawk":1vk84xjo said:I don't think he fits the #1 WR role similar to DeAndre Hopkins and Marcus Wheaton. Guys like Patterson, Allen, Hunter, and Austin will be drafted ahead of him because of their upside. He is not talked about at all though and if we did draft him I could see him as a decent upgrade over Golden Tate. He is much more polished route runner and has better size. He has made big catches in big games and looks to be pro ready just limited to being a very good #2 WR in the league if he perfects his craft.