Register    Login    Forum    Search    FAQ    Contact Us  Your donations are greatly appreciated! Donate

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
 
Author Message
 Post subject: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:06 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
http://www.hawkblogger.com/2013/01/rank ... -1-57.html

I don't usually read his stuff, but I thought this was semi-interesting. He rates them on factors including "age", "health", "impact to date", "potential growth", and "hard to replace". Then each player is given an overall score.

I'm not sure I agree with some of these. Personally I think Leon is too low. I also think Bruce is a little high, and I've been one of his supporters.

Thoughts?

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:22 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 987
Marshawn Lynch the 20th most important Seahawk? Controversial.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:29 pm 
NET Practice Squad
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 4:45 am
Posts: 96
Location: Greensboro, NC
Interesting idea, but I think his "potential growth" category causes him to overvalue the younger players -- leads to situations where guys like Scruggs and Sweezy are ranked above Lynch. Which, IMHO, is a bit crazy.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:29 pm 
* NET Staff Alumni *
* NET Staff Alumni *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5874
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
Hawkspur wrote:
Marshawn Lynch the 20th most important Seahawk? Controversial.


Especially with the likes of Jeremy Lane, Greg Scruggs, Anthony McCoy and J.R. Sweezy ahead of him.

Meh.

_________________
@SeahawkGreg

Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:31 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 12:28 pm
Posts: 4996
Location: Beaverton, Oregon
FlyingGreg wrote:
Hawkspur wrote:
Marshawn Lynch the 20th most important Seahawk? Controversial.


Especially with the likes of Jeremy Lane, Greg Scruggs, Anthony McCoy and J.R. Sweezy ahead of him.

Meh.


Not even gonna bother clicking the link after reading this.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:32 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 12:12 pm
Posts: 987
HawkFanNC wrote:
Interesting idea, but I think his "potential growth" category causes him to overvalue the younger players -- leads to situations where guys like Scruggs and Sweezy are ranked above Lynch. Which, IMHO, is a bit crazy.


That was the flaw in the formula for me as well. If a player is one of the elite in their position in the league, what does their potential growth matter?


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:33 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm
Posts: 793
Jon Ryan is extremely underrated, he is one of the best punters in the game.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:36 pm 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 10230
Location: King In The North
bellingerga wrote:
FlyingGreg wrote:
Hawkspur wrote:
Marshawn Lynch the 20th most important Seahawk? Controversial.


Especially with the likes of Jeremy Lane, Greg Scruggs, Anthony McCoy and J.R. Sweezy ahead of him.

Meh.


Not even gonna bother clicking the link after reading this.


Well when you take into account his reasoning it makes a lot more sense. Not that I'm saying he's right or I agree, but it's not necessarily as outlandish as it sounds.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:37 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
Hawkspur wrote:
HawkFanNC wrote:
Interesting idea, but I think his "potential growth" category causes him to overvalue the younger players -- leads to situations where guys like Scruggs and Sweezy are ranked above Lynch. Which, IMHO, is a bit crazy.


That was the flaw in the formula for me as well. If a player is one of the elite in their position in the league, what does their potential growth matter?

Agreed. Guys like Mebane need to be way higher.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:38 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8189
Location: Antioch, CA
When I saw Sweezy is the 16th best player on the team (ahead of Lynch, Clemons, Bryant, Tate, Browner, and Mebane) I closed the window.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:40 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
Maybe I missed this, but I also don't understand what the final score means. Most important player? Best player? I see no meaning attached to the number...

I understand what factors go into determining the final score, but I don't get what exactly that score represents.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 3:48 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
He just tweeted this:
I think some folks are mistaking the list as "who is the best player?" It is really, "most likely to be on the roster in the next 5 years."

Now I kinda feel like this list is just overstating the obvious.
:zzzzz:

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:00 pm 
* NET X's & O's Guru *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 11:24 am
Posts: 6865
Location: PNW
razgriz737 wrote:
He just tweeted this:
I think some folks are mistaking the list as "who is the best player?" It is really, "most likely to be on the roster in the next 5 years."

Now I kinda feel like this list is just overstating the obvious.
:zzzzz:


If that's the case, then why did he rank them by perceived value to the team? Sounds like he's backpedaling.

_________________
Image


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:03 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2012 4:12 pm
Posts: 719
Location: Seattle (From Spokane)
AbsolutNET wrote:
razgriz737 wrote:
He just tweeted this:
I think some folks are mistaking the list as "who is the best player?" It is really, "most likely to be on the roster in the next 5 years."

Now I kinda feel like this list is just overstating the obvious.
:zzzzz:


If that's the case, then why did he rank them by perceived value to the team? Sounds like he's backpedaling.

Good point. No matter which way he spins it, the list just seems flawed in a number of different ways.

_________________
"It wasn't just a dimb coincidence lik you probably tgought. They tested what makes you a fat slov and those colors won just like Emerald is telling you what happens be t...... next!" -- jamsomatic

My 2013 adopt-a-rookie: #humblethug


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 4:11 pm 
* Report Button *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm
Posts: 7032
Lynch is a stud, but RB's still a position where a team should be able to chew up a youngun on their first deal. Lynch's running style makes him elite and unique. That style was necessary to make the 2010, 2011 and early 2012's team even respectable. Now that the Seahawks have a QB, his running style may just be a tasty cherry on top.

If Lynch blew his knee out in preseason next year, it'd suck, but with Cable and Wilson, the offense is still top 10. You couldn't say that before.

Wish blogger would quit being a fairy and own it.

_________________
@ryanadamdavis


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 9:11 pm 
* Mr Random Thought *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Tue Mar 06, 2007 1:44 am
Posts: 7402
I just kind of glanced at it, but his system really undervalues Frank Omiyale big time. He and Flynn were probably the two best pure backup players on the team this last season.

_________________
Image
"I believe there’s merit to the idea that once something in life becomes conventional, it’s no longer the safest path to success." -Matt Waldman
"If everyone's thinking alike, no one's thinking." -Bill Walsh


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:02 pm 
NET Veteran
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm
Posts: 1095
Not too bad. I understand Lynch and his rating. The longevity of a RB is not that great.
I would have put Rice higher. It seems he IMO overvalued potential for some players


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2013 11:50 pm 
NET Veteran
Offline

Joined: Sat May 23, 2009 1:45 pm
Posts: 883
Given positional value, I don't like seeing Okung below Wagner and Chancellor.

Farwell feels too low, he's the best at what he does and should be able to do it for a long time.


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:15 am 
* NET Baller *
User avatar
Online

Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am
Posts: 11705
Location: Graham, WA
lol @ Lane over Browner.

_________________
Image
"Never Say Never, because limits, like fears, are often just an illusion" - Michael Jordan


Top 
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Hawk Blogger Ranks the Seahawks
 Post Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2013 12:43 am 
* The Producer *
* The Producer *
User avatar
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 2:57 pm
Posts: 10230
Location: King In The North
Throwdown wrote:
lol @ Lane over Browner.


He's not saying Lane is better than Browner. He's saying that potentially in 2-3 years Lane could be a starter and Browner could be retired.

_________________
Image Image Tanzania¹²


Top 
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Board index » SEAHAWKS.NET - THE ESSENTIAL SEAHAWKS COMMUNITY » [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: brimsalabim, Google [Bot], grizbob, HoustonHawk82, jammerhawk, Lawke, lobohawk, StaffAmerica74, Throwdown, tperkins and 64 guests

 
 

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.