 |
| Author |
Message |
|
SDHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 5:19 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 5:06 pm Posts: 228
|
|
If we get Tebow, we go from media darling to media circus. Don't want the distraction.
Tebow also won't buy in unless he has a legit shot to win the job and be the starter. He should think about UFL or CFL
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Mistashoesta
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:50 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2012 4:22 am Posts: 515
|
|
I would pluck Chandler Harnish off the Colts practice squad.
_________________ San Fransisco. Still partying like it's 1981.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 6:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7329
|
|
Wilson Jackson Rexy.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:01 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Dennis Dixon.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:03 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6633
|
JSeahawks wrote: Dennis Dixon. Bastard.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:07 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
pehawk wrote: JSeahawks wrote: Dennis Dixon. Bastard. You like Darron Thomas better? He could be had on the cheap! Actually i was being mostly serious about Dixon though. I think he's a pretty ideal backup. And to be honest, I dont expect Wilson to miss more then a handful of games in the next 10 years. He's just not a guy that puts himself in position to get injured, even though he's a running QB. And for the record, i'd be ecstatic if we drafted Denard Robinson. But not as a QB. I see him as a returner and maybe a safety or cornerback.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:17 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6633
|
|
Where was Dixon last year? Out of the league, right? Thats my concern.
I'm not opposed.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:22 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
pehawk wrote: Where was Dixon last year? Out of the league, right? Thats my concern.
I'm not opposed. I thought he was backing up Joe Flacco in Baltimore? But, I guess I might be wrong, havnt really followed him that closely.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
NorthDallas40oz
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:28 pm |
|
| NET Practice Squad |
 |
Joined: Wed Nov 28, 2012 7:04 pm Posts: 81
|
|
Dennis Dixon was on and off of Baltimore's PS this season and hasn't attempted an NFL pass since week 2 of the 2010 season.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
hawkfan68
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 7:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:10 am Posts: 2641 Location: Sammamish, WA
|
|
Vince Young would be a great backup. Seneca Wallace is old side but I think he may thrive in the read option offense. TJack train has left the station. Unless Tjack has gained immense decision making ability, he's a no go. No one on that list sticks out. Matt Scott of Arizona may be a potential mid-round pick (4 - 6 rounds) in the draft.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
TeamoftheCentury
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:19 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 11:54 am Posts: 340 Location: Orlando, FL
|
SDHawk wrote: If we get Tebow, we go from media darling to media circus. Don't want the distraction.
Tebow also won't buy in unless he has a legit shot to win the job and be the starter. He should think about UFL or CFL Well... I knew it wouldn't take long for someone to suggest it would be a distraction. I just don't see it. It was a distraction for the NYJ because they handled it all wrong. The media + the coaching staff lying to him. I think it's being a bit optimistic to say that the Seahawks are a media darling team. There were some who had to speak well of them (perhaps even though they didn't want to). Where I live... everyone hates the Seahawks. I have to put up with it all the time. They treat the Seahawks like a 2nd class team from a 2nd class city. My suggestion would be a very specific role (one that has been talked about with Tebow... to play FB or some other position that would maximize his strengths.) Tebow is a class individual and the only distraction would be what the media would try to project upon the team. What else is new? That doesn't bother Pete and it certainly doesn't bother the likes of Sherman, etc. If the guy adds another weapon... Seattle could be even more envied. I must admit that I wouldn't mind seeing a few southeasterners give the Seahawks some love because of their fondness for Tebow. Tebow is NOT T.O. Plus... NO ONE is going to say that he's going to Seattle to supplant Russell Wilson (nor would Wilson feel threatened like Mark Sanchez may have been.) Tebow would be a great teammate. Really, I can't see a negative. Sorry, I don't buy the distraction reason. Just doesn't fly. But... Seahawks fans... probably not worth discussing any further as it's just hypothetical. Just my 2 cents.
_________________ Team of the Century!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Hawk-A-Loogie
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:31 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2012 3:44 pm Posts: 189 Location: Washington
|
|
Losing Flynn makes me feel very insecure about our future if Wilson was to go down.
_________________ TOUCHDOWN SEAHAWKS!!!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seahawksfanatic000
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 8:42 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2011 5:41 pm Posts: 372
|
|
Is clipboard Jesus still an option?
_________________ Russell Wilson doesn't do losing anymore -peachesenregalia, jan 5, 2013
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
davidonmi
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:15 pm |
|
| NET Bench Warmer |
 |
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2013 4:20 pm Posts: 42
|
|
my list Matt Moore Chase Daniel Vince Young Tim Tebow (as a last resort) Draft
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Austin Hawk
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:35 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2009 9:34 pm Posts: 668 Location: Austin, Texas
|
|
Hasselbeck
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Thunderbird
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 9:46 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:24 pm Posts: 167 Location: Shoreline, WA
|
pehawk wrote: I know some will want to keep Flynn, but I think he gets traded. It makes to much cap sense, and it also goes along with this FO doing "right" by their players.
Flynn wants to start, and I think the Seahawks FO will do whatever they can, within reason, to facilitate Flynn's preference. I'm a proud Seahawks fan for a lot of reasons, but I was really proud of how the FO treated Tavaris last preseason. He was traded instead of being released outright; to give him some dignity (maybe there's a better word choice there) on the way out. Tjax EARNED that type of exit...he's one classy and tough SOB.
With all that, who would YOU want the Seahawks to bring in to back up Wilson? To keep this hypothetical within reasonable boundaries lets restrict it to 1 vet FA and 1 late round draft pick. Here’s a list of FA’s;
Brian Hoyer – ARI Luke McCown – ATL Joe Flacco – BAL Tarvaris Jackson – BUF Tyler Thigpen – BUF Derek Anderson – CAR Jason Campbell – CHI Josh McCown – CHI Bruce Gradkowski – CIN Drew Stanton – IND Brady Quinn – KC Pat Devlin – MIA – (Ex) Matt Moore – MIA Chase Daniel – NO David Carr – NYG Matt Leinart – OAK Charlie Batch – PIT Byron Leftwich – PIT Kellen Clemens – STL Rex Grossman – WAS Vince Young – FA Sage Rosenfels – FA Seneca Wallace – FA Donovan McNabb – FA A.J. Feeley – FA Troy Smith – FA Chris Redman – FA John Beck – FA Stephen McGee – FA Jordan Palmer – FA J.P. Loseman – FA
Of those, I’d LOVE Chase Daniels – but it would be a lateral move for him. So, as much as he’s ripped here, I’d prefer Tjack.
For the developmental QB, I’d REALLY prefer Denard Robinson just to be a nice toy. But, there’s no way I’d trust him to play a game or two at the position. So, I’m going to go Colin Klein or….crybaby’s brother Jordan Rogers. Picking Rogers on a gut hunch. So my QB depth chart would be;
1)Wilson 2)Tjack 3)JRogers
You? After giving this some thought I am going to say that I would not one player on this list. I have not read the whole thread yet (maybe this has been suggested already). We trade up and sacrifice some picks--on top of money--to get the most elite replacements that we can find for some aging, but elite players. The one to two years they have to acclimate to this team should be perfect. I am thinking about a replacement for Marshawn in a couple years. Or--even better--maybe some new big guys (on both sides) like Star Lotulelei (DT) or Chance Warmack (OG). Those lads would be awesome...the only question is who needs someone like Flynn, some cash and maybe some later draft picks? umm... The Jags The Chiefs The Jets Philly? The Cards (Bad trade because Flynn knows where the bodies are buried--IOW, he knows our DNA) The Bills? Who knows? We have a shit load of bargaining power right now. I cannot remember a time when the Hawks held such beautiful, high-ground. Every room that Pete and John walk into this off-season, they immediately hold the advantage and can run the table. They are in a place to build the perfect and young beast, that will last for years to come. I have the flu right now, so I maybe speaking another language, but getting this off my chest seems to be making me feel a little better. Well, this, NyQuil, my lady and this stuff I just picked up called Northern Lights.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
SeaHawk80
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:08 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 8:53 am Posts: 161 Location: Pe Ell, WA
|
2. I think Seneca would thrive in this offense and he would never complain about being a back up I always really liked him and wanted him to succeed.  Now drool over Russ and Seneca pulling a little misdirection/wildcat/fleeflicker action. of course senecas like 83 now but very little use on him no hard miles on him anyway. 3. Matt Jones QB AZ - is very athletic and has enjoyed his greatest success when rolling out and forcing defenders to account for his legs, while also possessing the arm strength and touch to scorch them if they lose coverage responsibilities. (Wilson Jr.)
_________________ "Go Hawks" Russlemainia Hawknballs wrote: If he keeps making plays and fighting his way into the end zone he can do the entire interview while taking a dump and eating potato chips for all i care.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Thunderbird
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 10:21 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:24 pm Posts: 167 Location: Shoreline, WA
|
SeaHawk80 wrote: 2. I think Seneca would thrive in this offense and he would never complain about being a back up I always really liked him and wanted him to succeed.  Now drool over Russ and Seneca pulling a little misdirection/wildcat/fleeflicker action. of course senecas like 83 now but very little use on him no hard miles on him anyway. 3. Matt Jones QB AZ - is very athletic and has enjoyed his greatest success when rolling out and forcing defenders to account for his legs, while also possessing the arm strength and touch to scorch them if they lose coverage responsibilities. (Wilson Jr.) What about the big guys, on both sides of the ball? You know, a couple of young stars willing to learn the system and make this team that much closer to being complete. We have so many options right now, but we need two more big, durable and smart brawlers.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
AgentDib
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:37 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 9:08 pm Posts: 1735 Location: Seattle
|
I see a pretty large step down from Flynn to Vince Young. The reason why we are talking about being able to trade Flynn is because he is one of the better backups in the NFL, and you are going from that to a player who was not on an NFL roster this season. lukerguy wrote: The problem with this, my friend, is PC didn't say he wanted an experienced backup...he said he wanted someone who could do the things that RW can do, and that even Flynn can't do those things. He wants someone who's mobile. The read option really would be foreign to all veteran guys that you could sign- hell it was new to the NFL before Cam Newton. I addressed this earlier; Pete's comments along these lines struck me as in regards to the draft and were made in close proximity to him talking about the 10 draft picks. It makes perfect sense to take developmental guys that can excel in our system, but that does not exclude a veteran backup filling the #2 slot. lukerguy wrote: So, that to say, I value a veteran back up, but if PC wants a mobile QB, I would sure has heck rather draft a guy and hope he can learn than sign someone like Tavaris or V.Young. I only see two possibilities if we go with a rookie as our #2 this season. We could prepare him to start NFL games if needed by giving him a lot of snaps in the preseason that could otherwise be going to Wilson. Alternatively, we could give those snaps to Wilson anyway and risk having a completely under prepared rookie starting at the most important position on our team. Neither one of these seems like a good idea to me. Am I missing a possibility?
_________________ "Check out my 2012 NFL Draft Grades. I just gave the worst grade ever to Seattle." - WalterFootball.com
Last edited by AgentDib on Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Atradees
|
Post subject: Re: Assuming Flynn's traded - who do you want? Posted: Tue Jan 15, 2013 11:44 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Wed Aug 04, 2010 7:22 pm Posts: 1993 Location: South of Heaven
|
|
Seneca Wallace? You people need to put down the bong! Boo..drugs are bad!
Keep Flynn. No bad assumptions!
Let me edit to elaborate...and not "attack the man".
The front office loves having a quality quarterback problem.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12HawkFan, 8mask, AgentDib, BCHawk, bellingerga, BirdsCommaAngry, BlueThunder, Brahn, brettb3, CANHawk, ccla, CHawk, ChrisB Bacon, Cinque52, coach78, CurryStopstheRuns, DavidSeven, dbmack, dunceface, FidelisHawk, FlyingGreg, Geezerhawk, GoldenIsThyTate, Google [Bot], Hawk Finn, HawkFan72, HoustonHawk82, IHateSleeves, Jazzhawk, jdblack, JoeHawk80, lacenterhawk, Lawke, Leep, Lords of Scythia, Maelstrom787, MissoulaHawk, Onyx, razgriz737, Scottemojo, scutterhawk, seahawkfreak, Seahawkwalt1967, Seeker, SoCalSeahawk, Sonichellboy, Spleenhawk2.0, streets24, TDBinOLY, The Outfield, THUGCAPS, Veilside, WillySchu, Wiseguy and 195 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|