It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:32 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]

Schefter has us at #4

The Essential Online Seahawks Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. RATING: PG-13
Post Reply
Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:35 am
  • Was just watching ESPN - Adam Schefter gave his ranking and we are #4. His comment: This is the team nobody wants to play against right now.

    #1 - Denver
    #2 - NE
    #3 - Atlanta
    #4 - Seattle
    Image
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1416
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:40 am
  • Personally I think we should be #2.
    Image

    "The Seahawks showed today that they regarded me highly and I appreciate that, and I will continue to show how much I regard Paul Allen and the Seattle Seahawks with my play." - Richard Sherman
    User avatar
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 7889
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 6 miles from Richard Sherman!

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am
  • power ranking are so freaking stupid,
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1873
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am
  • I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9078
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:48 am
  • Second best in the NFC. I will take it.
    February 2, 2014... the day the dream was finally realized
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 4643
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:49 am
  • I'd put us at 3 - since DEN and ATL deserve #1 and #2. I don't think anyone in either league deserves #3 more than we would at this point.
    Image
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1416
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:56 pm
  • Aros wrote:Personally I think we should be #2.

    but we already are the *ish* Don Aros :th2thumbs:
    Pinch me, I'm dreamin right?
    User avatar
    HommyHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 152
    Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:41 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:00 pm
  • The AFC is weaker than the NFC. That alone should move up the 'Hawks. We have played a tough schedule as well
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1858
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:02 pm
  • the top 3 spots should be NFC teams, the AFC simply can not compete against the Best of the NFC this year.

    my rankings,
    1. Seattle
    2. San Fran
    3. Green Bay
    4. New England
    5. Denver
    6. Atlanta
    User avatar
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2539
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:06 pm
  • My rankings.

    1. Atlanta
    2. Denver
    3. Green Bay
    4. Seattle
    5. San Francisco
    6. New England
    7. Houston

    How can anyone rank Atlanta low? Just because of a "feeling"? That team has been solid all year long winning close games.
    SUPER BOWL 48 CHAMPIONS!!!!!!!!

    RIP ROAD WOES 12/2/2012
    User avatar
    SonicHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7030
    Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:09 pm
  • Did he watch the Pats defense vs San Fran and Jacksonville?
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7926
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:10 pm
  • GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.
    User avatar
    MrCarey
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1674
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 pm
  • Okay so what bowl game does this ranking get us?
    Image
    User avatar
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 9072
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 pm
  • The Irrelevant Rankings Bowl.
    Image

    Go Hawks.
    User avatar
    SouthSoundHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2108
    Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:23 pm
  • MrCarey wrote:
    GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


    Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.
    Bigpumpkin
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
    *GOLD SUPPORTER*
     
    Posts: 4761
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA USA

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:01 pm
  • drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.


    You think just like the mediots doing the power rankings at ESPN. They still have the niners ahead of the Seahawks too. I don't know why though, Seattle has 5 quality wins compared to the niners 3 and has won just as many games as the niners.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1570
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:03 pm
  • Bigpumpkin wrote:
    MrCarey wrote:
    GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


    Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.


    Now that we have a QB that ranks highly in QBR, it's a GREAT stat. But any stat that ranks Alex Smith as high as it does is still a questionable ranking system.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1570
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:11 pm
  • drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

    Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?
    49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
    49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.
    User avatar
    BlueTalon
    * NET Curmudgeon *
    * NET Curmudgeon *
     
    Posts: 7356
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
    Location: Eastern Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:18 pm
  • #1 Denver
    #2 Atlanta
    #3 Green Bay
    #4 Seattle

    IMO
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7926
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:23 pm
  • BlueTalon wrote:
    drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

    Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?



    Probably based on their entire season of work. They beat the Saints, Packers and Brady on the road. That carries weight in my mind. Upon further review it may not be a wise choice listening to the 9ers fans critique of their own team recent performances.

    Bottom line, until I see the Seahawks dominating good teams on the road, I will have a skeptic sitting in the dark regions of my mind.
    Image
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Chris Clemons 2010-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013
    Brandon Browner 2011-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    Wilson will sign for $18M+ (3/4/2014)
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 9078
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Covington, Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:04 pm
  • Meh..we're peaking late, but had some stinkers on the road. We still haven't beat a good team on the road, so I'm looking at #4 as a good thing. Especially since all of the teams in that group have a better records. Those teams also took care of business in their division much better than we did.
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2510
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm

Expand view

Post Reply

It is currently Thu Jul 24, 2014 4:32 pm

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF THE 12TH MAN[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]

Powered by the Heart of the 12th Man
© 2014 Seahawks.NET
dotNET TwentyFourteen template created by Anguish

Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.