It is currently Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:01 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
Seahawks.NET AMAZON STOREFRONT

Schefter has us at #4

The Essential Online Seattle Football Fan Forum Community. There simply is NO substitute. LANGUAGE RATING: PG-13
Post Reply
Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:35 am
  • Was just watching ESPN - Adam Schefter gave his ranking and we are #4. His comment: This is the team nobody wants to play against right now.

    #1 - Denver
    #2 - NE
    #3 - Atlanta
    #4 - Seattle
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1496
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:40 am
  • Personally I think we should be #2.
    Image

    There are three certainties in life. Death, taxes and the perpetual shuffling of the Seattle Seahawks offensive line.
    User avatar
    Aros
    [[ .NET Godfather ]]
     
    Posts: 11771
    Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am
    Location: Just 4 miles from Richard Sherman!

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am
  • power ranking are so freaking stupid,
    "Whoever drafts Golden Tate is gonna win the Super Bowl" - Me
    User avatar
    Lithium
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2100
    Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:01 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:43 am
  • I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 10692
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Kent, Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:48 am
  • Second best in the NFC. I will take it.
    ImTheScientist wrote:This guy is the closest thing to beast mode we will ever see. You got a glimpse of that yesterday. He was instantly my favorite player when they signed him. Give the dude a chance and don't overreact or overthink preseason. Go Hawks. Lacy will rush for 1,100 and 10TDs. Bend the knee.
    User avatar
    Hasselbeck
    * NET Sage *
     
    Posts: 11358
    Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 4:55 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:49 am
  • I'd put us at 3 - since DEN and ATL deserve #1 and #2. I don't think anyone in either league deserves #3 more than we would at this point.
    User avatar
    nsport
    * NET Sports Handicapper *
     
    Posts: 1496
    Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2009 9:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 1:56 pm
  • Aros wrote:Personally I think we should be #2.

    but we already are the *ish* Don Aros :th2thumbs:
    " I don't come to bow, I come to conquer." Bob Marley
    User avatar
    HommyHawk
    NET Rookie
     
    Posts: 297
    Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2010 10:41 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:00 pm
  • The AFC is weaker than the NFC. That alone should move up the 'Hawks. We have played a tough schedule as well
    User avatar
    Happypuppy
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2018
    Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 5:40 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:02 pm
  • the top 3 spots should be NFC teams, the AFC simply can not compete against the Best of the NFC this year.

    my rankings,
    1. Seattle
    2. San Fran
    3. Green Bay
    4. New England
    5. Denver
    6. Atlanta
    User avatar
    Axx
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2538
    Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2012 12:37 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:06 pm
  • My rankings.

    1. Atlanta
    2. Denver
    3. Green Bay
    4. Seattle
    5. San Francisco
    6. New England
    7. Houston

    How can anyone rank Atlanta low? Just because of a "feeling"? That team has been solid all year long winning close games.
    I enjoy ruining threads by making them about personal attacks and then commenting about how personal attacks make the other person's argument invalid.

    :les:
    User avatar
    SonicHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 9764
    Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2012 12:56 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:09 pm
  • Did he watch the Pats defense vs San Fran and Jacksonville?
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10077
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:10 pm
  • GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.
    User avatar
    MrCarey
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 1681
    Joined: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:16 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:14 pm
  • Okay so what bowl game does this ranking get us?
    Image
    User avatar
    Tech Worlds
    * Capt'n Dom *
     
    Posts: 11454
    Joined: Wed Feb 28, 2007 6:40 am
    Location: Granite Falls, WA

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:19 pm
  • The Irrelevant Rankings Bowl.
    Image

    Go Hawks.
    User avatar
    SouthSoundHawk
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 2267
    Joined: Mon Aug 20, 2012 5:06 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:23 pm
  • MrCarey wrote:
    GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


    Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.
    Proud Member of the .Net Old Farts Society
    Bigpumpkin
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 7062
    Joined: Sun Mar 04, 2007 8:13 pm
    Location: Puyallup, WA USA

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:01 pm
  • drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3, but as a division rival maybe I would not because it is what is expected.


    You think just like the mediots doing the power rankings at ESPN. They still have the niners ahead of the Seahawks too. I don't know why though, Seattle has 5 quality wins compared to the niners 3 and has won just as many games as the niners.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5729
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:03 pm
  • Bigpumpkin wrote:
    MrCarey wrote:
    GoldenIsThyTate wrote:power ranking are so freaking stupid,


    So is QBR, but we all still eat it up.


    Seems that folks here just love "bathing" in the good feelings that come from seeing their team ranked high.


    Now that we have a QB that ranks highly in QBR, it's a GREAT stat. But any stat that ranks Alex Smith as high as it does is still a questionable ranking system.
    rideaducati
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 5729
    Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:11 pm
  • drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

    Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?
    49ers webzone: Win or lose, i hope you injure Sherman. Like a serious career ending injury. I don't want him to get paid.
    49ers webzone: noise should not be the overwhelming reason a team is favored. they need to spray noise-damping foam onto the ceiling of that place.
    User avatar
    BlueTalon
    * NET Curmudgeon *
     
    Posts: 7898
    Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:06 am
    Location: Eastern Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:18 pm
  • #1 Denver
    #2 Atlanta
    #3 Green Bay
    #4 Seattle

    IMO
    User avatar
    theENGLISHseahawk
    NET Pro Bowler
     
    Posts: 10077
    Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:13 am

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:23 pm
  • BlueTalon wrote:
    drdiags wrote:I think #4 is fair. Not sure NE should be at #2 after their last two games. I would move Atlanta up to 2 and put 9ers at 3

    Hey Doc, why would you have the Digits ranked ahead of us, after we just dismantled them?



    Probably based on their entire season of work. They beat the Saints, Packers and Brady on the road. That carries weight in my mind. Upon further review it may not be a wise choice listening to the 9ers fans critique of their own team recent performances.

    Bottom line, until I see the Seahawks dominating good teams on the road, I will have a skeptic sitting in the dark regions of my mind.
    Leon Washington 2010-2012 Red Bryant 2008-2013 Golden Tate 2010-2013 Breno Giacomini 2011-2013 - Gone but not forgotten.
    R.I.P Les "PithyRadish" Norton 9/13/2014
    User avatar
    drdiags
    * The Doc *
     
    Posts: 10692
    Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am
    Location: Kent, Washington

Re: Schefter has us at #4
Wed Dec 26, 2012 5:04 pm
  • Meh..we're peaking late, but had some stinkers on the road. We still haven't beat a good team on the road, so I'm looking at #4 as a good thing. Especially since all of the teams in that group have a better records. Those teams also took care of business in their division much better than we did.
    User avatar
    HawKnPeppa
    NET Veteran
     
    Posts: 4737
    Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm

Expand view

Post Reply

It is currently Mon Apr 23, 2018 10:01 am

Please REGISTER to become a member

Return to [ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]




Information
  • Who is online
.NET IndexSEAHAWKS.NET - THE VOICE OF SEATTLE FOOTBALL[ THE OFFICIAL NET NATION FAN FORUM ]
© 2016 Seahawks.NET
dotNET TwentySixteen template created by Anguish

Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.