| Author |
Message |
|
Barthawk
|
Post subject: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm  Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:27 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 2027
Location: San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
|
|
Kenneth the Menneth @KennethArthurS
SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords".
This is a crock of crap... No way any responsible urinalysis collector would allow two people to provide their sample at the same time. I have done my fair share of piss tests in 20+ years in the Army and never has anyone else been in the collection area except for me and the "meat gazer".
I don't believe for one second that Sherman will be using this as his argument for pissing hot.
_________________
_____________________
Where can I find Seahawks98.com???
Last edited by Barthawk on Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
  |
|
 |
|
kidhawk
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:29 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:00 pm
Posts: 10259
Location: Anchorage, AK
|
Barthawk wrote: Kenneth the Menneth @KennethArthurS
SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords".
This is a crock of crap... No way any responsible urinalysis collector would allow two people to provide their sample at the same time. I have done my fair share of piss tests in 20+ years in the Army and never has anyone else been in the collection area except for me and the "meat gazer". Well this wouldn't be the first "source" to make up a story for Sherman. Until Sherman says it's true, I'm not buying that it's his actual claim
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:30 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5683
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
|
Not buying it. Who the heck is Kenneth Arthur?
In fact, I'd guess this is someone trying to be funny.
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Barthawk
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:30 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 2027
Location: San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
|
|
Greg- a contributor at Field Gulls.. I read it a little bit ago and waited to see if he responded with something more satirical but nothing..
If it was an attempt at humor, it was an extremely poor effort..
_________________
_____________________
Where can I find Seahawks98.com???
Last edited by Barthawk on Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Fox0r
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:31 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 6:30 pm
Posts: 1850
Location: Lynnwood, WA
|
|
You're telling me that a guy that went to Stanford would use this as the basis for his appeal? That post almost sounds like sarcasm to me.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Barthawk
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:34 am |
|
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:17 am
Posts: 2027
Location: San Antonio, TX by way of Kalispell, MT
|
|
Fox- that is what I thought initially.. I don't believe for a second that anyone would use this a basis for an appeal
_________________
_____________________
Where can I find Seahawks98.com???
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Missing_Clink
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:35 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:53 am
Posts: 1097
|
|
that has got to be a joke
|
|
| |
|
|
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:38 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am
Posts: 5683
Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
Barthawk wrote: Greg- a contributor at Field Gulls.. I read it a little bit ago and waited to see if he responded with something more satirical but nothing..
If it was an attempt at humor, it was an extremely poor effort.. Ahh, ok. I'm with you - I've also had endless piss tests during my Navy career, and you are right - it's you and the observer only. _________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SEC FAN
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:42 am |
|
| NET Starter |
|
Joined: Sun Sep 16, 2012 11:39 pm
Posts: 332
|
Barthawk wrote: Kenneth the Menneth @KennethArthurS
SOURCE: #Seahawks corner Richard Sherman will claim urine sample was tainted when him and Brandon Browner "crossed swords". I heard this joke before. It was in some movie called Saceballs I think.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CurryStopstheRuns
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:44 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2009 6:52 pm
Posts: 1429
|
|
What is wrong with a little playful sword fighting?
_________________
I am a firm believer in luck, and I found that the harder I work the more I have of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
JKent82
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:46 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm
Posts: 2813
|
|
Kenneth's joking haha, follow him on twitter he's a crack up. And read more Fieldgulls you guys, they have good stuff these days.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:52 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 876
|
|
The tainted sample defense worked for Ryan Braun.
But I think the "crossed swords" defense only works if you didn't make eye contact.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:52 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8167
Location: Antioch, CA
|
|
IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal.
But something tells me this is not a legitimate claim of Sherman's.
_________________ 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahwkgal
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:56 am |
|
| * NET Hottie * |
 |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1309
|
|
Whatever happened to innocent until "proven" guilty? Maybe, just maybe he is telling the truth.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:58 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 876
|
HawkFan72 wrote: IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal. If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing?
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Seahwkgal
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:01 am |
|
| * NET Hottie * |
|
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 1:27 pm
Posts: 1309
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal. If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing? I am just speculating but maybe Browner was the one who was "dirty". Hence why there was no appeal or fight on the issue. IDK.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
HawkFan72
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:04 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:50 am
Posts: 8167
Location: Antioch, CA
|
Sgt. Largent wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal. If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing? Only one of them can claim they are tainted if that story is going to work. If both of them claim the other one was dirty, then that kind of takes away the point of the argument. _________________
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sgt. Largent
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:08 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2012 10:10 am
Posts: 876
|
HawkFan72 wrote: Sgt. Largent wrote: HawkFan72 wrote: IF Sherman and Browner were told to take their test together, then he might actually be able to win since that seems like a big mistake on the test taker's part. I could see how lawyers would be able to twist that into a successful appeal. If this was the case then why didn't Browner claim the same thing? Only one of them can claim they are tainted if that story is going to work. If both of them claim the other one was dirty, then that kind of takes away the point of the argument. I wonder if they drew straws to see who would be the tainter.
_________________
If there is no Seahawk football in heaven, then we will never die.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
SeahawksFanForever
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:11 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
|
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 12:11 pm
Posts: 1831
|
|
I have been following Kenneth on twitter for a long time. He is a comedian. Do no believe this tweet of his. He is always joking like this.
_________________
Richard Sherman to Skip Bayless: "I'm tired of your ignorant pollution!"
Follow me on twitter: @seahawks_fan12
|
|
| |
|
|
|
rideaducati
|
Post subject: Re: More speculation about the appeal for Sherm Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:20 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:18 pm
Posts: 548
|
JKent82 wrote: Kenneth's joking haha, follow him on twitter he's a crack up. And read more Fieldgulls you guys, they have good stuff these days. If you do go over to fieldgulls.com, don't disagree with the "groupthink" or they'll banish you from posting. They're very efficient in their banishing. The first time they disagree with you, some "staff" member will casually call you a name. When you state your case, many more "staff" members call you names and when you get into a back and forth with them, they ban you because you didn't agree with them. Fieldgulls is more of a Seahawk site for a few elitists that think they know more than they actually do.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Users browsing this forum: -seanhawk-, 12thManNorth, Apeman00, Archer, Barthawk, Bigpumpkin, bloodkingg, CANHawk, Cartire, chihawk, coorslighthawk, CPHawk, Evil_Shenanigans, geoff21, GoldenTater81, gwinnUSAF77, hawker84, Hawkfish, HawkinSinCity, HighlandHawk, jdblack, JerHawk81, Largent80, legend38, Majestic-12 [Bot], Mojambo, MSN [Bot], onanygivensunday, ParisPC07, RampagingMice, sainthawk29, sam1313, Scottemojo, seahawksTopGear, smashmouth59, uncle fester, Uppercase and 201 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
