 |
| Author |
Message |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:35 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
What do you think of Russell Wilson running the read option?
I like it, and think of it as a great addition to what we do.
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
FlyingGreg
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:39 am |
|
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 6:19 am Posts: 5684 Location: Oak Harbor, WA
|
I'll give you the standard .NET answer: If it keeps working, it's brilliant! If it doesn't, it sucks and we should fire Bevell. 
_________________ @SeahawkGregYEAH, WE HAVE A DUDE NAMED CHRISTINE...DEAL WITH IT!
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Throwdown
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:45 am |
|
| * NET Baller * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 11325 Location: Graham, WA
|
|
Did he even do it in college? At NC State he ran the west coast, and at Wisconsin it was pro-style.
Only reason Griffin and Newton do it is because their coaches want them comfortable.
_________________ Official Tharold Simon Fan Club Member
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:51 am |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
Who here agrees that its just another weapon/asset for the offense that makes it more difficult on the other defenses to stop the man Russell #3 and beast mode.
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JKent82
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 11:59 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 12:13 pm Posts: 2813
|
|
I like it. However it mainly just needs to be to keep the defense honest and busy thinking. Thankfully Russell seems to know quite well that it doesn't feel good to take on LB's and safeties. So as long as he takes it himself very infrequently I love it.
Just be careful with it...
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
BWRyan
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:04 pm |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 10:35 am Posts: 371
|
|
I hate option in the NFL. Too gimmicky, plus it's a great way for your undersized QB to get slammed over and over again.
No thanks.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:14 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
He hasn't gotten hit yet so... it is a valuable weapon I want to see more of...
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
The Radish
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:25 pm |
|
| * NET Radish * |
 |
 |
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 8:18 pm Posts: 14168 Location: Spokane, Wa.
|
Why are you calling it read option in one string and WCO in another? 
_________________  Still missing you everyday pal.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 12:35 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
Huh? I didn't call it wco?
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:00 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 8734 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
|
As long as e don't go to it too frequently and get Rusty shitkicked, I don't have a problem with it. Like a reverse, the Sidney Rice pass or the bubble screen to Golden Tate (which is the greatest play in all sports) it's just something else for the defense to have to keep an eye out for. Makes us dynamic and a little unpredictable and being upredictable makes defenses play on their heels (which makes them easier for Marshawn to run over). Nothing wrong with that.
_________________   Papaki douchebag love turtle long time   What...? it's not like anyone banged a turtle or anything. Just chill.....
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 1:09 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
Agree
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
mikeak
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:18 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
Joined: Fri Aug 24, 2012 6:24 pm Posts: 1390
|
Throwdown wrote: Did he even do it in college? At NC State he ran the west coast, and at Wisconsin it was pro-style.
Only reason Griffin and Newton do it is because their coaches want them comfortable. He did do it at NC State his first season and got injured at least twice. Once early and the second time in the bowl game when we were dominating rutgers in the first half and then the second without RW we laid an egg and lost the game. I don't like anything gimmicky that continously puts the QB in harms way. Once in awhile - sure fine. Several times a game - don't like it. I was fine with the first scramble / run in the Minnesota game I was fine with. Mainly cause I turned around and said they should run RW here and boom they did 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:29 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10339 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
I have an even better idea: Why don't we just pull all the linemen from the game except Unger and have Russell Wilson run straight up the gut. Be a much more effective way to get our QB killed if we're going that route.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:36 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 8734 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
Sarlacc83 wrote: I have an even better idea: Why don't we just pull all the linemen from the game except Unger and have Russell Wilson run straight up the gut. Be a much more effective way to get our QB killed if we're going that route. And have Kam Chancellor go get Jeron Johnson some apple pies, cuz he's clearly playing like a rook...
_________________   Papaki douchebag love turtle long time   What...? it's not like anyone banged a turtle or anything. Just chill.....
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:42 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
Sarlacc83 wrote: I have an even better idea: Why don't we just pull all the linemen from the game except Unger and have Russell Wilson run straight up the gut. Be a much more effective way to get our QB killed if we're going that route. I think the read option is fine, and effective, if used sparingly. Wilson didnt even take a hit on the play and it picked up positive yardage. I'm all for anything that gains yards and like others have said, its just one more think defensive coordinators have to think about and prepare for.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:46 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6581 Location: Covington, Washington
|
|
Old Fart Alert!!
When I see Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and other elite QBs doing it, then I am fine with it. Until then, it is a gimmick and needs to be shelved.
End Old Fart Alert. And now get off my lawn you darn whippersnappers!
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:49 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15442 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
drdiags wrote: Old Fart Alert!!
When I see Tom Brady, Peyton Manning and other elite QBs doing it, then I am fine with it. Until then, it is a gimmick and needs to be shelved.
End Old Fart Alert. And now get off my lawn you darn whippersnappers! Just to be clear, are you saying Tim Tebow is NOT elite?
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
drdiags
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:51 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 7:33 am Posts: 6581 Location: Covington, Washington
|
JSeahawks wrote: Just to be clear, are you saying Tim Tebow is NOT elite?
Well, I wouldn't go so far as to say that. It is Tebow you understand. Totally different category. I mean elite doesn't even scratch the surface with this guy.
_________________  "Pray to the LORD now...Seattle are a bunch of heathen atheist Canadians." NFL GM: "How do you stop a Seahawk? Take away his doctor's prescription pad."”
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
skater18000
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:54 pm |
|
| NET Rookie |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2012 9:14 pm Posts: 296
|
|
Yah uh... who said we want tom Brady or any old fart elite qb. Besides Aaron Rodgers could probably run this kinda thing and he is elite from the eyes of most. Point is Russell isn't like any of those quarterbacks and neither is the offences they play in.
_________________ Week 1 of the preseason vs. The Tennessee Titans, I said the Seahawks were winning the superbowl...
"Oh and by the way, Go Hawks!!!" Russel Wilson
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sarlacc83
|
Post subject: Re: Read option? Posted: Wed Nov 07, 2012 2:56 pm |
|
| * NET Philistine * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:02 am Posts: 10339 Location: Portland, OR
|
|
Maybe if we just ignore this guy, he'll go away? I'm starting to think he gets off on this sort of thing.
_________________ My single greatest contribution to the board: "42-13" (formerly 24-14)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: 12thManNorth, A World Peace, AbsolutNET, Ad Hawk, amill87, Basis4day, beehawk46, Beeker, bestfightstory, Bigpumpkin, BlackSocks68, Blitzer88, BoatsAndHose, bryantology79, BullHawk33, bytor72, chawx, Chrome_Seahawk, Clayfighter, coach78, dbmack, Digsbone, EmbattleTheeHawks, FidelisHawk, Floridahawk79, FlyingGreg, GawksAtHawks, geoff21, Giedi, grizbob, HagFaithful, Hawk Finn, hawker84, HawkFan72, HunnyBadger, JacksSpleen, jammerhawk, Jazzhawk, JimZorn10, Jsolo, Kixkahn, Lords of Scythia, Maelstrom787, MichaelHawk70, MontanaHawk05, noflyzone, oldhawkfan, onanygivensunday, peachesenregalia, razgriz737, Scottemojo, SeahawkFrost, Seahawksfan425, SeahawksFanForever, Seahwkgal, Slick, Starrman44, streets24, sturg78, The Outfield, TriCHawk, YaktownHawK, Zukistubbs and 190 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|