Hawk Strap":23ak9j83 said:Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD
Seahawk Sailor":2sw0tsi4 said:Hawk Strap":2sw0tsi4 said:Said the same thing, Shark.
They spent less time reviewing Petersons non-TD
Well, in their defense, Peterson's "TD" was clearly going to be a score on the next play, whether it was a touchdown or not, whereas Tate's play provided a clear possibility to overturn a Tate touchdown.
SharkHawk":3fcql1q2 said:Why were they reviewing it? Our guy recovered it in the endzone anyway, which = TD. I swear Jerome Bogar is Bill Leavy, but just incompetent, not a blatant cheater.
Largent80":y3iy9bzz said:To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
JSeahawks":13eq0orv said:Largent80":13eq0orv said:To all The frakstix lambasting Tate for the last game....Suck IT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
The fact that he was really good today doesnt change the fact that he was horrible last week. He deserved the heckles last week just as much as he deserves the props today.
Correct. All scoring plays are automatically reviewed. Dunno why people are grumpy about it.AbsolutNET":3hxrxnjo said:SharkHawk":3hxrxnjo said:Why were they reviewing it? Our guy recovered it in the endzone anyway, which = TD. I swear Jerome Bogar is Bill Leavy, but just incompetent, not a blatant cheater.
Doesn't every score get reviewed?