 |
| Author |
Message |
|
grizbob
|
Post subject: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:19 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am Posts: 1680 Location: St George, UT
|
|
_________________ Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
CANHawk
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:26 pm |
|
| * Gangnameister * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sun Oct 04, 2009 3:29 pm Posts: 8719 Location: Vancouver BC, Canada
|
|
Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday.
_________________   Papaki douchebag love turtle long time   When the Thunder play the Grizzlies, I'll be cheering for a tornado.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:28 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6434
|
|
Nice words. Good to see. Gus is a ridiculously great guy.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
grizbob
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am Posts: 1680 Location: St George, UT
|
CANHawk wrote: Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday. Yup, in my perfect world scenario, It will be after PC's 2 Super Bowl wins and he retires 
_________________ Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
bestfightstory
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:39 pm |
|
| * Glitter over Knives * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:13 pm Posts: 6434
|
grizbob wrote: CANHawk wrote: Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday. Yup, in my perfect world scenario, It will be after PC's 2 Super Bowl wins and he retires  Y'know.... Not to create/promote infighting, but I think it is Gos or Cable who is next up. In a perfect world, the Seahawks create new paradigm and have co-head coaches. That's a marriage I would endorse.
_________________ "Some people here have been groomed to accept mediocrity and lame ducks, I'm on board with the vibrato!" -SouthSoundHawk
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
MontanaHawk05
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:51 pm |
|
| * 17Power Blogger * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 8:46 am Posts: 9691
|
Everyone was ready to fire Bradley two years ago when he had nothing to work with. How times change! 
_________________ GO HAWKS!!! Visit my Seahawks blog at 17power.blogspot.com!Follow me on Twitter at @17power
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
grizbob
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:57 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am Posts: 1680 Location: St George, UT
|
bestfightstory wrote: grizbob wrote: CANHawk wrote: Gus is going to be a Head Coach someday. Yup, in my perfect world scenario, It will be after PC's 2 Super Bowl wins and he retires  Y'know.... Not to create/promote infighting, but I think it is Gos or Cable who is next up. In a perfect world, the Seahawks create new paradigm and have co-head coaches. That's a marriage I would endorse. Not sure how that would work Leif, but you could do much worse than Tom Cable as head coach. It's just that Gus Bradley continues to impress me with his pressers. btw had to google paradigm 
_________________ Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Blitzer88
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 7:47 am Posts: 8130 Location: Pasco, WA
|
|
Bradley is pretty awesome.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 3:59 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6632
|
|
Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Montana, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sports Hernia
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:07 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm Posts: 5387
|
pehawk wrote: Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants. I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator. I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon.
_________________ Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Aros
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:09 pm |
|
| [[ .NET Godfather ]] |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:58 am Posts: 5349 Location: Maple Valley, WA
|
|
FIRE GUS BRADLEY!!!
Oh sorry, just a hiccup from 2010. Carry on.
_________________ "WE ALL WE GOT! WE ALL WE NEED!"
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
JSeahawks
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:10 pm |
|
| * NET Moderator * |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2007 2:35 pm Posts: 15422 Location: Milwaukie, Oregon
|
|
Personally i'd much rather have Cable then Bradley as our next coach, or go outside the organization and get somebody else. It's nothing against Bradley, I think he's a fine coach and all that but i've never seen anything from him that makes me think he's a future head coach.
_________________ 
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
grizbob
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 7:17 am Posts: 1680 Location: St George, UT
|
Aros wrote: FIRE GUS BRADLEY!!!
Oh sorry, just a hiccup from 2010. Carry on.  chug lots of water and call me in the morning 
_________________ Why is it when I try to come off as a smart ass, the opposite happens? :-(
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
pehawk
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
| * Report Button * |
 |
 |
Joined: Fri Feb 23, 2007 12:08 pm Posts: 6632
|
Sports Hernia wrote: pehawk wrote: Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants. I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator. I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon. I agree that its frustrating. But, alot of the situations, I'm especially thinking against Romo and Rogers, I gave credit to the opposing QB's. Romo especially played incredible that day. Bradford had 1 or 2 of those also.
_________________ @ryanadamdavis
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Scottemojo
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 8:35 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 9:14 am Posts: 7318
|
|
Bradley is about as much the actual DC as I am. Pete may try to be hands off, but no way that isn't actually his baby.
_________________ SEAHAWKS.NET. We All We Got, We All We Need
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 10:58 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm Posts: 1202
|
Scottemojo wrote: Bradley is about as much the actual DC as I am. Pete may try to be hands off, but no way that isn't actually his baby. Oh, and you know this for sure how? Unless you say you are on the coaching staff...go ahead and talk to this 
_________________ "A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
HawKnPeppa
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:26 pm |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 8:01 pm Posts: 1202
|
Sports Hernia wrote: pehawk wrote: Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants. I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator. I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon. What DC in the league doesn't run a soft soft when the situation dictates? A soft zone on third and long prevents big plays, and. most of the games the Hawks have played this season had a razor-thin point differential. Can you really have a D that is #1 overall in spite of their DC? That sounds more like rationalization than sound reasoning. He runs a soft zone on third and long, therefore he's no good? I would say that is just a difference in philosophy. If Pete didn't agree with philosophy, Gus wouldn't be doing it. If we see this offense finally takeoff this season, watch gus magically get more agressive as we play with a larger lead. 
_________________ "A couple years from now Wilson will be forgotten about and you will forget I said he would fail" (Cboom, 2012)
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
glowingeyedseahawk
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Fri Oct 12, 2012 11:40 pm |
|
| * PA's # 1 Seahawks Fan * |
 |
 |
Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2007 8:42 pm Posts: 437 Location: Sinking Spring, PA
|
Gheez, I thought you were talkin' about the guy in the political ad ??? FIRE GUS !! 
_________________ Go Hawks !! ~ ( in my best Russell impersonation )
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Sports Hernia
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 12:41 am |
|
| NET Veteran |
 |
 |
Joined: Thu Apr 30, 2009 4:36 pm Posts: 5387
|
pehawk wrote: Sports Hernia wrote: pehawk wrote: Thank goodness Cable likes to beat the shi out of coaches and women allegedly; its the only reason he wasn't gobbled up right after Al fired him. In Cable's defense, you should be able to deck whomever if you can create a rushing attack as he did in Oakland and now Seattle. He's EARNED the right to deck fools. Come to think of it, I like to think Cable's knocked Bevell around a few times.
And Can, I remember 95% of the yahoos on this board wanted Bradley gone. But they only posted that in between Dilfer and Charlie chants. I'm still a yahoo that would like to see him gone. His play-calling gets way too passive at times, see 3rd and long situations where he plays the softzone, only rushes 3 and gives up a first down. I think the only weakness of the defense is the D coordinator. I thought he'd "grow out of" his softzone tendencies, but he hasn't. Hopefully he will and soon. I agree that its frustrating. But, alot of the situations, I'm especially thinking against Romo and Rogers, I gave credit to the opposing QB's. Romo especially played incredible that day. Bradford had 1 or 2 of those also. True, but why go against what has been working after dominating for the previous 2 downs? Bring the heat, the pressure is on the offense on 3rd and long, dont only bring 3 and give the quarterback all day to throw he ball. All of the great defenses in the NFL (the Ravens, Pittsburgh ack, SF ack, AZ ack) dont let up on 3rd down and long. That is all I'm saying, I'm hoping Bradley figures this out soon, I really honestly want to like the guy but his play calling in certain situations irritates me to no end.
_________________ Hugh Millen = CBJ minus the cool beard
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
seabowl
|
Post subject: Re: The more I see this guy Posted: Sat Oct 13, 2012 2:48 am |
|
| NET Starter |
 |
Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2009 6:20 am Posts: 425
|
MontanaHawk05 wrote: Everyone was ready to fire Bradley two years ago when he had nothing to work with. How times change!  Two years ago? How about 2 weeks ago for our third down Defense. After the many coordinators throughout the league that have not made it as coaches of late I'm not so sure he is next up for a HC job. His system has done well recently with the players that were put in place but again there are probably 8-10 coordinators/position coaches per year that are looked at as HC candidates for the next season. We will see.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Users browsing this forum: akula, BAllenHawk, BallHawker, BamaHawk, Bigpumpkin, BlueTalons, CHawks4L, dbmack, Dismas, edogg23, FlyingGreg, Google [Bot], IcedHawk, JerHawk81, jpetty38, KCHawkGirl, lacenterhawk, Majestic-12 [Bot], nepahawk, peachesenregalia, RabidFrenzy, rickychen, SilNWest, Spleenhawk2.0, Sports Hernia, Sprfunk, suppaball, Tanzania12, Thepeelsessions, Tubafor, twisted_steel2, VancitySeahawk, Yahoo [Bot], Yakihawk, Zebulon Dak and 159 guests |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
 |
Seahawks.NET is an independent fan site and not associated with the Seattle Seahawks or the NFL (National Football League).
All content within this Seahawks fan page is provided by, and for, Seattle Seahawks fans. Copyright © Seahawks.NET.
|